The 14nm node designs is getting more sophisticated, and printability issues become more critical which need more advanced techniques to fix. One of the most critical processes is the contact patterning due to the very aggressive design rules and the process window which becomes quickly limited. Despite the large number of RET applied, some hotspot configurations remain challenging. It becomes increasingly challenging to achieve sufficient process windows around the hot spots just using conventional process such as OPC and rule-based SRAF insertion. Although, it might be desirable to apply Inverse Lithography Technique (ILT) on all hot spots to guarantee ideal mask quality. However, because of the high number of hot spots to repair in the design, that solution might be much time consuming in term of OPC and mask processing. In this paper we present a hybrid OPC solution based on local ILT usage around hot spots. It is named as Local Printability Enhancement (LPE) flow. First, conventional OPC and SRAF placement is applied on the whole design. Then, we apply LPE solution only on the remaining problematic hot spots of the design. The LPE flow also takes into account the mask rules so that it maintains the mask rule check (MRC) compliance through the borders of the repaired hot spot’s areas. We will demonstrate that the LPE flow enlarges the process window around hot spots and gives better lithography quality than baseline. The simulation results are confirmed on silicon wafer where all the hot spots are printed. We will demonstrate that LPE flow enlarges the depth of focus of the most challenging hot spot by 30nm compared to POR conventional solution. Because the proposed flow applies ILT solution on very local hot spot areas, the total OPC run time remains acceptable from manufacturing side.
[1]
Alexander Tritchkov,et al.
Inverse lithography technique for advanced CMOS nodes
,
2013,
Advanced Lithography.
[2]
Franklin M. Schellenberg.
Resolution enhancement technology: the past, the present, and extensions for the future
,
2004,
SPIE Advanced Lithography.
[3]
Rui Shi,et al.
The selection and creation of the rules in rules-based optical proximity correction
,
2001,
ASICON 2001. 2001 4th International Conference on ASIC Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8549).
[4]
Alfred Kwok-Kit Wong,et al.
Resolution enhancement techniques in optical lithography
,
2001
.
[5]
Bahaa E. A. Saleh,et al.
Reduction Of Errors Of Microphotographic Reproductions By Optimal Corrections Of Original Masks
,
1981
.
[6]
Yuri Granik,et al.
Fast pixel-based mask optimization for inverse lithography
,
2006
.
[7]
John Zimmerman,et al.
EUV lithography with the Alpha Demo Tools: status and challenges
,
2007,
SPIE Advanced Lithography.
[8]
John Arnold,et al.
EUV lithography at the 22nm technology node
,
2010,
Advanced Lithography.
[9]
Yuri Granik,et al.
Inverse vs. traditional OPC for the 22nm node
,
2009,
Advanced Lithography.