Soil water availability alters the inter- and intra-cultivar competition of three spring wheat cultivars bred in different eras.

Competition for water generates a classic aspect of the tragedy of the commons, the ‘race for fish’, where crops must allocate more resource to acquisition of the limiting resource than is optimal for crop yield allocation. A pot experiment using a simple additive (target–neighbour) design was conducted to examine the above-ground and below-ground growth of three spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars when grown alone and in mixtures at three levels of water availability. The effects of competition and water availability were compared by observing patterns of growth, biomass allocation and below-ground outcomes. Competitive interactions were investigated among cultivars ‘HST’, ‘GY602’ and ‘LC8275’, target plant of each cultivar grown without neighbouring plants are referred to herein as control plant and one target plant of each cultivar sown surrounded either by same or another cultivar as intra- or inter-cultivar competition. Competitive ability was assessed as the response ratio (lnRR) between the target plant surrounded by six other plants and the target plant in isolation. Our results showed that the cultivar ‘HST’, released over a century ago, produced a higher biomass and grain yield than the more recently released cultivars ‘LC8275’ and ‘GY602’ when grown as isolated plants with sufficient water supply. However, competition for resources from neighbours led to target plant biomass and grain yield being significantly reduced relative to controls in all three cultivars, particularly in ‘HST’. When subjected to intra-cultivar competition, the two recently released cultivars ‘LC8275’ and ‘GY602’ had higher grain yields and water use efficiency for grain than ‘HST’ in all three water regimes. The landrace ‘HST’ had better and significantly linear relationships between biomass and biomass allocation, root length and specific root length, whereas the recent and modern cultivars had much more water-related species-specific changes in root morphology and allocation patterns. These results suggest that crop traits that influence competitive ability, such as biomass allocation to roots and root plasticity in response to drought have changed in modern wheat cultivars because of breeding and selection.

[1]  Liwei Shao,et al.  Root size, distribution and soil water depletion as affected by cultivars and environmental factors. , 2009 .

[2]  G. McNickle,et al.  Focusing the metaphor: plant root foraging behaviour. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  Weiqi Wang,et al.  Soil water availability and plant competition affect the yield of spring wheat , 2009 .

[4]  Ariel Novoplansky,et al.  Picking battles wisely: plant behaviour under competition. , 2009, Plant, cell & environment.

[5]  Jill E. Cairns,et al.  Identification of physiological traits underlying cultivar differences in drought tolerance in rice and wheat. , 2009 .

[6]  I. Martı́n,et al.  Yield and Osmotic Adjustment Capacity of Barley Under Terminal Water-Stress Conditions , 2008 .

[7]  A. Patanothai,et al.  Root Distribution of Drought‐Resistant Peanut Genotypes in Response to Drought , 2008 .

[8]  Fengmin Li,et al.  The cooperative relation between non-hydraulic root signals and osmotic adjustment under water stress improves grain formation for spring wheat varieties. , 2008, Physiologia plantarum.

[9]  K. Murphy,et al.  Relationship among phenotypic growth traits, yield and weed suppression in spring wheat landraces and modern cultivars , 2008 .

[10]  Vm Dunbabin,et al.  Simulating the role of rooting traits in crop-weed competition , 2007 .

[11]  B. Ehdaie,et al.  Domestication and Crop Physiology: Roots of Green-Revolution Wheat , 2007, Annals of botany.

[12]  J. O'donovan,et al.  The Weed-Competitive Ability of Canada Western Red Spring Wheat Cultivars Grown under Organic Management , 2007 .

[13]  M. Hutchings,et al.  Challenging the tragedy of the commons in root competition: confounding effects of neighbour presence and substrate volume , 2007 .

[14]  N. Paveley,et al.  Predictability of wheat growth and yield in light-limited conditions , 2007, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[15]  W. Muir,et al.  Multilevel Selection 1: Quantitative Genetics of Inheritance and Response to Selection , 2007, Genetics.

[16]  B. Li,et al.  Genotype and Planting Density Effects on Rooting Traits and Yield in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) , 2006 .

[17]  Fengmin Li,et al.  Hydraulic and Non-hydraulic Root-sourced Signals in Old and Modern Spring Wheat Cultivars in a Semiarid Area , 2006, Journal of Plant Growth Regulation.

[18]  M. Pigliucci,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity and evolution by genetic assimilation , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[19]  Peter J. Martin,et al.  Incremental crop tolerance to weeds: A measure for selecting competitive ability in Australian wheats , 2006, Euphytica.

[20]  D. Nielsen,et al.  Water deficit effects on root distribution of soybean, field pea and chickpea , 2006 .

[21]  J. Craine Competition for Nutrients and Optimal Root Allocation , 2006, Plant and Soil.

[22]  A. Blum Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential-are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? , 2005 .

[23]  E. Tendziagolska,et al.  Competition and Productivity in Mixture of Oats and Wheat , 2005 .

[24]  Y. Bashan,et al.  Fresh-weight measurements of roots provide inaccurate estimates of the effects of plant growth-promoting bacteria on root growth : a critical examination , 2005 .

[25]  J. Lynch,et al.  Root architectural tradeoffs for water and phosphorus acquisition. , 2005, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[26]  L. Aarssen,et al.  Size inequality and the tragedy of the commons phenomenon in plant competition , 2005, Plant Ecology.

[27]  A. Weigelt,et al.  Competition among three dune species: the impact of water availability on below–ground processes , 2005, Plant Ecology.

[28]  R. E. Sharp,et al.  Root growth maintenance during water deficits: physiology to functional genomics. , 2004, Journal of experimental botany.

[29]  S. Christensen,et al.  Simulation of Above-Ground Suppression of Competing Species and Competition Tolerance in Winter Wheat Varieties , 2004 .

[30]  Gurjeet Gill,et al.  The impact of plant breeding on the grain yield and competitive ability of wheat in Australia , 2004 .

[31]  D. Robinson Scaling the depths: below‐ground allocation in plants, forests and biomes , 2004 .

[32]  Jonathan P Lynch,et al.  Optimization modeling of plant root architecture for water and phosphorus acquisition. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[33]  R. K. Behl,et al.  Indices of drought tolerance in wheat genotypes at early stages of plant growth , 2004 .

[34]  L. R. Benjamin,et al.  The theory and application of plant competition models: an agronomic perspective. , 2003, Annals of botany.

[35]  U. Boström,et al.  Growth and Development of Six Barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare L.) Cultivars in Response to a Model Weed (Sinapis alba L.) , 2003 .

[36]  Q. Li,et al.  Allocation of Photosynthates and Grain Growth of Two Wheat Cultivars with Different Potential Grain Growth in Response to Pre‐ and Post‐anthesis Shading , 2003 .

[37]  P. Jolliffe,et al.  Indices of plant competition , 2003 .

[38]  B. Shipley,et al.  The balanced‐growth hypothesis and the allometry of leaf and root biomass allocation , 2002 .

[39]  M. Zobel,et al.  Studying plant competition: from root biomass to general aims , 2002 .

[40]  Paolo Bàrberi,et al.  Weed management in organic agriculture: are we addressing the right issues? , 2002 .

[41]  J. P. Grime,et al.  The role of plasticity in resource capture by plants , 2002, Evolutionary Ecology.

[42]  E. Simms,et al.  The relative advantages of plasticity and fixity in different environments: when is it good for a plant to adjust? , 2002, Evolutionary Ecology.

[43]  N. Jordan,et al.  Feasibility of selection for high weed suppressive ability in soybean: Absence of tradeoffs between rapid initial growth and sustained later growth , 2001, Euphytica.

[44]  Deirdre Lemerle,et al.  Genetic improvement and agronomy for enhanced wheat competitiveness with weeds , 2001 .

[45]  O. Evdokimova,et al.  Dry Matter Partitioning between Plant Organs in Wheat Cultivars Differing in Productivity and Drought Resistance , 2001, Russian journal of plant physiology.

[46]  L. Aarssen,et al.  The separation of above- and below-ground competition in plants A review and critique of methodology , 2001, Plant Ecology.

[47]  Da‐Yong Zhang,et al.  Donald's ideotype and growth redundancy: a game theoretical analysis , 1999 .

[48]  R. Belford,et al.  Root:shoot ratios of old and modern, tall and semi-dwarf wheats in a mediterranean environment , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[49]  A. Weigelt,et al.  Does plant competition intensity rather depend on biomass or on species identity , 2002 .

[50]  M. Küppers,et al.  4 – Canopy Gaps: Competitive Light Interception and Economic Space Filling—A Matter of Whole-Plant Allocation , 1994 .

[51]  J. Morgan,et al.  Water Use, Grain Yield, and Osmoregulation in Wheat , 1986 .

[52]  Ward Chesworth,et al.  Book reviewPedogenesis and soil taxonomy: L. P. Wilding, N. E. Smeck and G. F. Hall. Vol. I concepts and interactions; vol. II. The soil orders, 1983, Elsevier, US $49.00 and $55.25 , 1985 .