Factors Affecting the Outcome of Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Randomized, Controlled Study

Study Design. Prospective randomized controlled trial. Objective. To analyze factors that may influence the outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) followed by physiotherapy versus physiotherapy alone for treatment of patients with cervical radiculopathy. Summary of Background Data. An understanding of patient-related factors affecting the outcome of ACDF is important for preoperative patient selection. No previous prospective, randomized study of treatment effect modifiers relating to outcome of ACDF compared with physiotherapy has been carried out. Methods. 60 patients with cervical radiculopathy were randomized to ACDF followed by physiotherapy or physiotherapy alone. Data for possible modifiers of treatment outcome at 1 year, such as sex, age, duration of pain, pain intensity, disability (Neck Disability Index, NDI), patient expectations of treatment, anxiety due to neck/arm pain, distress (Distress and Risk Assessment Method), self-efficacy (Self-Efficacy Scale) health status (EQ-5D), and magnetic resonance imaging findings were collected. A multivariate analysis was performed to find treatment effect modifiers affecting the outcome regarding arm/neck pain intensity and NDI. Results. Factors that significantly altered the treatment effect between treatment groups in favor of surgery were: duration of neck pain less than 12 months (P = 0.007), duration of arm pain less than 12 months (P = 0.01) and female sex (P = 0.007) (outcome: arm pain), low EQ-5D index (outcome: neck pain, P = 0.02), high levels of anxiety due to neck/arm pain (outcome: neck pain, P = 0.02 and NDI, P = 0.02), low Self-Efficacy Scale score (P = 0.05), and high Distress and Risk Assessment Method score (P = 0.04) (outcome: NDI). No factors were found to be associated with better outcome with physiotherapy alone. Conclusion. In this prospective, randomized study of patients with cervical radiculopathy, short duration of pain, female sex, low health quality, high levels of anxiety due to neck/arm pain, low self-efficacy, and a high level of distress before treatment were associated with better outcome from surgery. No factors were found to be associated with better outcome from physiotherapy alone. Level of Evidence: 2

[1]  E. Benzel,et al.  Optimal Duration of Conservative Management Prior to Surgery for Cervical and Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Literature Review , 2014, Global spine journal.

[2]  Jairus J. Quesnele,et al.  The course and prognostic factors of symptomatic cervical disc herniation with radiculopathy: a systematic review of the literature. , 2014, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[3]  A. Söderlund,et al.  Surgery Versus Nonsurgical Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy: A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Surgery Plus Physiotherapy With Physiotherapy Alone With a 2-Year Follow-up , 2013, Spine.

[4]  A. Söderlund,et al.  Physical Function Outcome in Cervical Radiculopathy Patients After Physiotherapy Alone Compared With Anterior Surgery Followed by Physiotherapy: A Prospective Randomized Study With a 2-Year Follow-up , 2013, Spine.

[5]  M. Krishna,et al.  Effect of Psychological Status on Outcome of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery , 2012, Asian spine journal.

[6]  E. Helseth,et al.  Anterior cervical discectomy with fusion in patients with cervical disc degeneration: a prospective outcome study of 258 patients (181 fused with autologous bone graft and 77 fused with a PEEK cage) , 2010, BMC surgery.

[7]  D. Riew,et al.  Predictors of Outcome After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Multivariate Analysis , 2009, Spine.

[8]  H. Vernon.  The Neck Disability Index: state-of-the-art, 1991-2008. , 2008, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[9]  A. Peolsson,et al.  Predictive factors for long-term outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion: a multivariate data analysis , 2008, European Spine Journal.

[10]  A. Peolsson,et al.  Predictive factors for arm pain, neck pain, neck specific disability and health after anterior cervical decompression and fusion , 2006, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[11]  A. Peolsson,et al.  Predictive factors for the outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion , 2003, European Spine Journal.

[12]  R. Ross.  The distress and risk assessment method (DRAM). , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  R. Brooks.  EuroQol: the current state of play. , 1996, Health policy.

[14]  E. Altmaier.  Role of Self-Efficacy in Rehabilitation Outcome among Chronic Low Back Pain Patients. , 1993 .

[15]  S. Hollis,et al.  The Distress and Risk Assessment Method: A Simple Patient Classification to Identify Distress and Evaluate the Risk of Poor Outcome , 1992, Spine.

[16]  S. Mior,et al.  The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. , 1991, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[17]  H. Bertalanffy,et al.  Clinical long-term results of anterior discectomy without fusion for treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy , 1988, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[18]  B. Romner,et al.  Duration of symptoms as a predictor of outcome after lumbar disc surgery , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[19]  J. Hobby,et al.  The distress and risk assessment method (DRAM). , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[20]  W. Zung.  A SELF-RATING DEPRESSION SCALE. , 1965, Archives of general psychiatry.