Enhancing message collaboration through predictive modeling of user behavior

Research studies have shown that the effectiveness of collaboration and the choice of communication modality is intricately linked with the perceived presence and availability of the collaborating parties. Most collaboration systems offer users the ability to publish their presence for effective collaboration. However, a close observation of users' behavioral data shows a divergence such as in a published `busy' state a user is actually willing to collaborate with certain people or in a published `available' state a user is unwilling to collaborate with certain people. This behavior makes the notion of presence in collaboration systems ineffectual and often unreliable. In this paper, we propose a new predictive model of behavioral presence for collaborative messaging systems that automatically infers multiple presence states based on users expected collaboration behavior towards a contact. We present a novel confirmatory data mining technique that overlays a `cluster of interest' on standard clustering techniques such as k-means, fuzzy k-means, and consensus clustering. We present validation results of our predictive model on data obtained from real-world deployed enterprise servers across multiple locations over a period of seven months.

[1]  Jaime Teevan,et al.  Understanding how the projection of availability state impacts the reception incoming communication , 2013, CSCW.

[2]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Instant Messaging and Interruption: Influence of Task Type on Performance , 2000 .

[3]  John C. Tang,et al.  Lilsys: Sensing Unavailability , 2004, CSCW.

[4]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  Butler lies: awareness, deception and design , 2009, CHI.

[5]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action , 2000, CSCW '00.

[6]  Mikael Wiberg,et al.  Managing availability: Supporting lightweight negotiations to handle interruptions , 2005, TCHI.

[7]  Martin Pielot,et al.  Didn't you see my message?: predicting attentiveness to mobile instant messages , 2014, CHI.

[8]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Should I call now? understanding what context is considered when deciding whether to initiate remote communication via mobile devices , 2007, GI '07.

[9]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Controlling interruptions: awareness displays and social motivation for coordination , 2004, CSCW.

[10]  Steve Benford,et al.  Effects of content and time of delivery on receptivity to mobile interruptions , 2010, Mobile HCI.

[11]  Scott E. Hudson,et al.  Responsiveness in instant messaging: predictive models supporting inter-personal communication , 2006, CHI.

[12]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Instant messaging in teen life , 2002, CSCW '02.

[13]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  The character, functions, and styles of instant messaging in the workplace , 2002, CSCW '02.

[14]  Eleanor G. Rieffel,et al.  Learning how to feel again: towards affective workplace presence and communication technologies , 2012, CHI.