Calibration and Evaluation of a Mercury Model for a Western Stream and Constructed Wetland

Numerous studies have shown that Steamboat Creek in Nevada is highly contaminated with mercury, with aqueous mercury concentrations more than two orders of magnitude greater than nearby mountain streams. One objective of this study was to determine if the new Spreadsheet-based Ecological Risk Assessment for the Fate of Mercury (SERAFM) model could be calibrated to the concentrations of unfiltered and dissolved total mercury, and unfiltered and dissolved MeHg in the water column for a reach on SBC and a related constructed wetland mesocosm for different seasons and residence times. SERAFM is a new U.S. Environmental Protection Agency steady state, single segment, mass balance mercury model that has been applied to lakes, and this study also examined the model’s applicability for modeling an arid flowing water environment in different seasons. The average combined error between observed and model-estimated mercury concentrations was 12% and 17% for the reach and mesocosm, respectively. Some recommendations are proposed that may allow SERAFM to better model flowing systems.

[1]  D. Wayne,et al.  The Hg geochemistry of a geothermal stream, Steamboat Creek, Nevada: natural vs. anthropogenic influences , 1998 .

[2]  A. Kraepiel,et al.  Photooxidation of Hg(0) in artificial and natural waters. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  S. Lindberg,et al.  Sunlight and iron(III)-induced photochemical production of dissolved gaseous mercury in freshwater. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  E. Haack,et al.  Mercury methylation in macrophytes, periphyton, and water – comparative studies with stable and radio-mercury additions , 2002, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[5]  Chih Ted Yang,et al.  Sediment transport : theory and practice / Chih Ted Yang , 1995 .

[6]  D. Lean,et al.  Distribution and transformation of elemental mercury in the St. Lawrence River and Lake Ontario , 2000 .

[7]  J. Bonzongo,et al.  Hydrologic controls on water chemistry and mercury biotransformation in a closed river system: The Carson River, Nevada , 2006 .

[8]  H. Hemond,et al.  The role of microorganisms in elemental mercury formation in natural waters , 1995 .

[9]  H. Lewerenz,et al.  Methylmercury (Environmental Health Criteria No. 101). 144 Seiten, 5 Abb. 11 Tab. World Health Organization, Geneva 1990. Preis: 16, — Sw.fr.; 12,80 US $ , 1991 .

[10]  G. A. Gill,et al.  Methylmercury concentrations and production rates across a trophic gradient in the northern Everglades , 1998 .

[11]  R. Carroll,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of the Carson River mercury transport model , 2001 .

[12]  C. Driscoll,et al.  Application of the Regional Mercury Cycling Model (RMCM) to Predict the Fate and Remediation of Mercury in Onondaga Lake, New York , 1998 .

[13]  S. Siciliano,et al.  Microbial reduction and oxidation of mercury in freshwater lakes. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  C. Gilmour,et al.  Behavior of mercury in the Patuxent River estuary , 1998 .

[15]  Bioaccumulation of mercury and methylmercury , 1995 .

[16]  S. Swanson,et al.  MERCURY IN WATER AND SEDIMENT OF STEAMBOAT CREEK, NEVADA: IMPLICATIONS FOR STREAM RESTORATION 1 , 2001 .

[17]  M. Diamond,et al.  Mercury Dynamics in the Lahontan Reservoir, Nevada: Application of the QWASI Fugacity/Aquivalence Multispecies Model , 2000 .

[18]  Jerry R. Miller,et al.  Mercury mobility at the Carson River Superfund Site, west-central Nevada, USA: Interpretation of mercury speciation data in mill tailings, soils, and sediments , 1997 .

[19]  E. Marchand,et al.  Evaluation of wetland methyl mercury export as a function of experimental manipulations. , 2006, Journal of environmental quality.

[20]  R. Mason,et al.  Mercury in the Chesapeake Bay , 1999 .

[21]  M. Marvin-DiPasquale,et al.  Distribution of total and methyl mercury in sediments along Steamboat Creek (Nevada, USA). , 2004, The Science of the total environment.

[22]  S. A. Abdrashitova,et al.  Mercury in the Aquatic Environment: A Review of Factors Affecting Methylation , 2001 .

[23]  Robert B. Ambrose,et al.  PARTITION COEFFICIENTS FOR METALS IN SURFACE WATER, SOIL, AND WASTE , 1999 .

[24]  E. Marchand,et al.  Use of constructed wetlands with four different experimental designs to assess the potential for methyl and total Hg outputs , 2006 .

[25]  Jerry R. Miller,et al.  Simulation of mercury transport and fate in the Carson River, Nevada , 2000 .

[26]  M. Gustin,et al.  Net methyl mercury production versus water quality improvement in constructed wetlands: Trade-offs in pollution control , 2005, Wetlands.

[27]  M. Marvin-DiPasquale,et al.  Microbial cycling of mercury in contaminated pelagic and wetland sediments of San Pablo Bay, California , 2003 .

[28]  Reed C. Harris,et al.  Reactivity and mobility of new and old mercury deposition in a boreal forest ecosystem during the first year of the METAALICUS study. Mercury Experiment To Assess Atmospheric Loading In Canada and the US. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  S. Chapra.  Surface Water-Quality Modeling , 1996 .

[30]  E. A. Henry,et al.  Mercury methylation in aquatic systems affected by acid deposition. , 1991, Environmental pollution.

[31]  Lisa B. Cleckner,et al.  Mercury methylation in periphyton of the Florida Everglades , 1999 .

[32]  A. J. Stewart,et al.  Mercury speciation and bioaccumulation in lotic primary producers and primary consumers , 1996 .