Optimal reactive power flow via the modified barrier Lagrangian function approach

Abstract A new approach called the Modified Barrier Lagrangian Function (MBLF) to solve the Optimal Reactive Power Flow problem is presented. In this approach, the inequality constraints are treated by the Modified Barrier Function (MBF) method, which has a finite convergence property; i.e. the optimal solution in the MBF method can actually be in the bound of the feasible set. Hence, the inequality constraints can be precisely equal to zero. Another property of the MBF method is that the barrier parameter does not need to be driven to zero to attain the solution. Therefore, the conditioning of the involved Hessian matrix is greatly enhanced. In order to show this, a comparative analysis of the numeric conditioning of the Hessian matrix of the MBLF approach, by the decomposition in singular values, is carried out. The feasibility of the proposed approach is also demonstrated with comparative tests to Interior Point Method (IPM) using various IEEE test systems and two networks derived from Brazilian generation/transmission system. The results show that the MBLF method is computationally more attractive than the IPM in terms of speed, number of iterations and numerical conditioning.

[1]  D. Ernst,et al.  Interior-point based algorithms for the solution of optimal power flow problems , 2007 .

[2]  R. Jabr,et al.  A Primal-Dual Interior Point Method for Optimal Power Flow Dispatching , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[3]  E. A. Belati,et al.  Primal-Dual Logarithmic Barrier and Augmented Lagrangian Function to the Loss Minimization in Power Systems , 2006 .

[4]  Victor H. Quintana,et al.  Interior-point methods and their applications to power systems: a classification of publications and software codes , 2000 .

[5]  Roman A. Polyak,et al.  Modified barrier functions (theory and methods) , 1992, Math. Program..

[6]  V. H. Quintana,et al.  Transmission power loss reduction by interior-point methods: implementation issues and practical experience , 2005 .

[7]  Lamine Mili,et al.  Optimal transformer tap selection using modified barrier-augmented Lagrangian method , 2003 .

[8]  G. Costa,et al.  Optimal Reactive Dispatch Problem via Improved Newton Approach , 2007 .

[9]  G.R.M. da Costa,et al.  Comparative studies of optimization methods for the optimal power flow problem , 2000 .

[10]  R. Adapa,et al.  A review of selected optimal power flow literature to 1993. II. Newton, linear programming and interior point methods , 1999 .

[11]  Katya Scheinberg,et al.  A Modified Barrier-Augmented Lagrangian Method for Constrained Minimization , 1999, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[12]  R. Polyak,et al.  Finding an equilibrium in a linear exchange market model using modified barrier function , 2005, 2005 IEEE Design Symposium, Systems and Information Engineering.

[13]  R. E. Marsten,et al.  A direct nonlinear predictor-corrector primal-dual interior point algorithm for optimal power flows , 1993 .

[14]  James A. Momoh,et al.  Improved interior point method for OPF problems , 1999 .

[15]  G. L. Torres,et al.  On a nonlinear multiple-centrality-corrections interior-point method for optimal power flow , 2001 .

[16]  S. Granville.  Optimal reactive dispatch through interior point methods , 1994 .

[17]  Aaron Melman,et al.  The Newton modified barrier method for QP problems , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[18]  R. Adapa,et al.  A review of selected optimal power flow literature to 1993. I. Nonlinear and quadratic programming approaches , 1999 .

[19]  R. P. Kumudini Devi,et al.  Evolutionary programming based security constrained optimal power flow , 2004 .

[20]  G. L. Torres,et al.  An interior-point method for nonlinear optimal power flow using voltage rectangular coordinates , 1998 .

[21]  Margaret H. Wright,et al.  Ill-Conditioning and Computational Error in Interior Methods for Nonlinear Programming , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..