An active learning reliability method combining Kriging constructed with exploration and exploitation of failure region and subset simulation

Abstract Subset simulation (SS) is a powerful reliability analysis method by transforming a rare failure event into a sequence of multiple intermediate failure events with larger probabilities. Recently, the metamodel-assisted SS method has attracted great attention to improve the efficiency of reliability analysis for time-consuming performance functions. However, in cases with highly nonlinear performance functions and small failure probabilities, it is still difficult to balance the estimation accuracy of failure probability and the computational cost on the construction of metamodels. To address this challenge, an active learning reliability method combining Kriging constructed with exploration and exploitation of failure region and subset simulation (AKEE-SS) is proposed in this paper. The exploration and exploitation of failure region benefit from the samples in the first and last levels of SS, respectively. To control the influence of metamodel error on the estimation of failure probability, two error measure functions are developed to quantify the influence and be considered in the termination conditions of metamodel update. Five numerical examples are used to test the performance of AKEE-SS. Results indicate that AKEE-SS is an accurate and efficient reliability analysis method for problems with highly nonlinear performance functions and small failure probabilities.

[1]  Henrik O. Madsen,et al.  Structural Reliability Methods , 1996 .

[2]  Søren Nymand Lophaven,et al.  DACE - A Matlab Kriging Toolbox, Version 2.0 , 2002 .

[3]  Dixiong Yang Chaos control for numerical instability of first order reliability method , 2010 .

[4]  Hongping Zhu,et al.  Assessing small failure probabilities by AK–SS: An active learning method combining Kriging and Subset Simulation , 2016 .

[5]  Michael D. Shields,et al.  Surrogate-enhanced stochastic search algorithms to identify implicitly defined functions for reliability analysis , 2016 .

[6]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation , 2011 .

[7]  G. Schuëller,et al.  A critical appraisal of methods to determine failure probabilities , 1987 .

[8]  G. Matheron The intrinsic random functions and their applications , 1973, Advances in Applied Probability.

[9]  Pingfeng Wang,et al.  A Maximum Confidence Enhancement Based Sequential Sampling Scheme for Simulation-Based Design , 2013, DAC 2013.

[10]  Özgür Kisi,et al.  RM5Tree: Radial basis M5 model tree for accurate structural reliability analysis , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  J. Beck,et al.  Estimation of Small Failure Probabilities in High Dimensions by Subset Simulation , 2001 .

[12]  Reuven Y. Rubinstein,et al.  Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method , 1981 .

[13]  Hong-shuang Li,et al.  A generalized Subset Simulation approach for estimating small failure probabilities of multiple stochastic responses , 2015 .

[14]  Hong-Shuang Li,et al.  Matlab codes of Subset Simulation for reliability analysis and structural optimization , 2016, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[15]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Comparison of bootstrapped artificial neural networks and quadratic response surfaces for the estimation of the functional failure probability of a thermal-hydraulic passive system , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  Maurice Lemaire,et al.  Assessing small failure probabilities by combined subset simulation and Support Vector Machines , 2011 .

[17]  Yongshou Liu,et al.  System reliability analysis through active learning Kriging model with truncated candidate region , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Ming J. Zuo,et al.  Efficient reliability analysis based on adaptive sequential sampling design and cross-validation , 2018, Applied Mathematical Modelling.

[19]  Enrico Zio,et al.  An improved adaptive kriging-based importance technique for sampling multiple failure regions of low probability , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[20]  S. Marelli,et al.  An active-learning algorithm that combines sparse polynomial chaos expansions and bootstrap for structural reliability analysis , 2017, Structural Safety.

[21]  Qiujing Pan,et al.  Sliced inverse regression-based sparse polynomial chaos expansions for reliability analysis in high dimensions , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[22]  A Henriques,et al.  An innovative adaptive sparse response surface method for structural reliability analysis , 2018, Structural Safety.

[23]  Liang Gao,et al.  An improved two-stage framework of evidence-based design optimization , 2018 .

[24]  Yongshou Liu,et al.  Active Learning Kriging Model Combining With Kernel-Density-Estimation-Based Importance Sampling Method for the Estimation of Low Failure Probability , 2018 .

[25]  Lambros S. Katafygiotis,et al.  Bayesian post-processor and other enhancements of Subset Simulation for estimating failure probabilities in high dimensions , 2011 .

[26]  Jian Wang,et al.  LIF: A new Kriging based learning function and its application to structural reliability analysis , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[27]  Liang Gao,et al.  A combined projection-outline-based active learning Kriging and adaptive importance sampling method for hybrid reliability analysis with small failure probabilities , 2019, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[28]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  M5 model tree and Monte Carlo simulation for efficient structural reliability analysis , 2017 .

[29]  Wang Jian,et al.  Two accuracy measures of the Kriging model for structural reliability analysis , 2017 .

[30]  Qiujing Pan,et al.  An efficient reliability method combining adaptive Support Vector Machine and Monte Carlo Simulation , 2017 .

[31]  Meng Li,et al.  Multivariate system reliability analysis considering highly nonlinear and dependent safety events , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[32]  Mohsen Ali Shayanfar,et al.  An efficient reliability algorithm for locating design point using the combination of importance sampling concepts and response surface method , 2017, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul..

[33]  Carlos Guedes Soares,et al.  Adaptive surrogate model with active refinement combining Kriging and a trust region method , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[34]  Xu Li,et al.  A sequential surrogate method for reliability analysis based on radial basis function , 2018, Structural Safety.

[35]  Ming Jian Zuo,et al.  A new adaptive sequential sampling method to construct surrogate models for efficient reliability analysis , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[36]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Accelerated subset simulation with neural networks for reliability analysis , 2012 .

[37]  A. Basudhar,et al.  An improved adaptive sampling scheme for the construction of explicit boundaries , 2010 .

[38]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  A combined Importance Sampling and Kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[39]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Effect of response surface parameter variation on structural reliability estimates , 2001 .

[40]  M. Eldred,et al.  Efficient Global Reliability Analysis for Nonlinear Implicit Performance Functions , 2008 .

[41]  Liang Gao,et al.  A novel projection outline based active learning method and its combination with Kriging metamodel for hybrid reliability analysis with random and interval variables , 2018, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[42]  Liang Gao,et al.  A general failure-pursuing sampling framework for surrogate-based reliability analysis , 2019, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[43]  Mohsen Ali Shayanfar,et al.  A new effective approach for computation of reliability index in nonlinear problems of reliability analysis , 2018, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul..

[44]  Chao Hu,et al.  Sequential exploration-exploitation with dynamic trade-off for efficient reliability analysis of complex engineered systems , 2017 .