GUARANTEED MINIMUM WITHDRAWAL BENEFIT IN VARIABLE ANNUITIES

We develop a singular stochastic control model for pricing variable annuities with the guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit. This benefit promises to return the entire initial investment, with withdrawals spread over the term of the contract, irrespective of the market performance of the underlying asset portfolio. A contractual withdrawal rate is set and no penalty is imposed when the policyholder chooses to withdraw at or below this rate. Subject to a penalty fee, the policyholder is allowed to withdraw at a rate higher than the contractual withdrawal rate or surrender the policy instantaneously. We explore the optimal withdrawal strategy adopted by the rational policyholder that maximizes the expected discounted value of the cash flows generated from holding this variable annuity policy. An efficient finite difference algorithm using the penalty approximation approach is proposed for solving the singular stochastic control model. Optimal withdrawal policies of the holders of the variable annuities with the guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit are explored. We also construct discrete pricing formulation that models withdrawals on discrete dates. Our numerical tests show that the solution values from the discrete model converge to those of the continuous model.

[1]  Peter A. Forsyth,et al.  The effect of modelling parameters on the value of GMWB guarantees , 2008 .

[2]  P. Forsyth,et al.  Numerical methods for controlled Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman PDEs in finance , 2007 .

[3]  Hang Zhu,et al.  Generalized solution in singular stochastic control: The nondegenerate problem , 1992 .

[4]  Thomas S. Salisbury,et al.  Financial valuation of guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits , 2006 .

[5]  Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefit in Variable Annuities , 2007 .

[6]  Intensity-based framework and penalty formulation of optimal stopping problems , 2007 .

[7]  Mark H. A. Davis,et al.  European option pricing with transaction costs , 1993 .

[8]  G. Barles,et al.  Convergence of approximation schemes for fully nonlinear second order equations , 1990, 29th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[9]  S. Posner,et al.  The Titanic Option: Valuation of the Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefit in Variable Annuities and Mutual Funds , 2001 .

[10]  G. Barles,et al.  CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL SCHEMES FOR PARABOLIC EQUATIONS ARISING IN FINANCE THEORY , 1995 .

[11]  Zhuliang Chen,et al.  A numerical scheme for the impulse control formulation for pricing variable annuities with a guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit (GMWB) , 2008, Numerische Mathematik.

[12]  P. Lions,et al.  User’s guide to viscosity solutions of second order partial differential equations , 1992, math/9207212.

[13]  Peter A. Forsyth,et al.  Quadratic Convergence for Valuing American Options Using a Penalty Method , 2001, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[14]  Yue Kuen Kwok,et al.  Reset and withdrawal rights in dynamic fund protection , 2004 .

[15]  W. Fleming,et al.  Controlled Markov processes and viscosity solutions , 1992 .

[16]  Dawn Hunter.  Numerical methods for controlled Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman PDEs in finance , 2007 .

[17]  A. Friedman.  Variational principles and free-boundary problems , 1982 .

[18]  Thomas F. Coleman,et al.  Hedging guarantees in variable annuities under both equity and interest rate risks , 2006 .

[19]  T. Siu.  Fair valuation of participating policies with surrender options and regime switching , 2005 .

[20]  X. Zhou,et al.  Stochastic Controls: Hamiltonian Systems and HJB Equations , 1999 .

[21]  A. R. Norman,et al.  Portfolio Selection with Transaction Costs , 1990, Math. Oper. Res..

[22]  Sunil Kumar,et al.  A Numerical Method for Solving Singular Stochastic Control Problems , 2004, Oper. Res..