fMRI investigation of sentence comprehension by eye and by ear: Modality fingerprints on cognitive processes

The neural substrate underlying reading vs. listening comprehension of sentences was compared using fMRI. One way in which this issue was addressed was by comparing the patterns of activation particularly in cortical association areas that classically are implicated in language processing. The precise locations of the activation differed between the two modalities. In the left inferior frontal gyrus (Broca's area), the activation associated with listening was more anterior and inferior than the activation associated with reading, suggesting more semantic processing during listening comprehension. In the left posterior superior and middle temporal region (roughly, Wernicke's area), the activation for listening was closer to primary auditory cortex (more anterior and somewhat more lateral) than the activation for reading. In several regions, the activation was much more left lateralized for reading than for listening. In addition to differences in the location of the activation, there were also differences in the total amount of activation in the two modalities in several regions. A second way in which the modality comparison was addressed was by examining how the neural systems responded to comprehension workload in the two modalities by systematically varying the structural complexity of the sentences to be processed. Here, the distribution of the workload increase associated with the processing of additional structural complexity was very similar across the two input modalities. The results suggest a number of subtle differences in the cognitive processing underlying listening vs. reading comprehension. Hum. Brain Mapping 13:239–252, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Sam Duker,et al.  Listening and Reading , 1965, The Elementary School Journal.

[2]  Thomas G. Devine Listening and Reading. , 1976 .

[3]  N. Geschwind Specializations of the human brain. , 1979, Scientific American.

[4]  Mary E. Curtis,et al.  Development of Components of Reading Skill. , 1980 .

[5]  S. Samuels,et al.  Reading and Listening to Expository Text , 1985 .

[6]  K. Patterson,et al.  Speak and spell: Dissociations and word-class effects. , 1987 .

[7]  T. Shallice Impairments of semantic processing: multiple dissociations , 1987 .

[8]  M. Coltheart,et al.  The cognitive neuropsychology of language , 1987 .

[9]  Harold Goodglass,et al.  Category and modality specific dissociations in word comprehension and concurrent phonological dyslexia , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  G. C. Orden,et al.  Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  M. Posner,et al.  Positron Emission Tomographic Studies of the Processing of Singe Words , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  D. Tank,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[14]  S. Petersen,et al.  Activation of extrastriate and frontal cortical areas by visual words and word-like stimuli. , 1990, Science.

[15]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Selective impairment of semantics in lexical processing , 1990 .

[16]  P. David Pearson Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[17]  Joanne F. Carlisle,et al.  Profiles of Listening and Reading Comprehension. , 1991 .

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The cortical localization of the lexicons. Positron emission tomography evidence. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  A. Galaburda,et al.  Human Cerebral Cortex: Localization, Parcellation, and Morphometry with Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  C. Perfetti,et al.  Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a "universal" phonological principle. , 1992 .

[21]  Ram Frost,et al.  Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning , 1992 .

[22]  A. Syrota,et al.  The Cortical Representation of Speech , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  S E Petersen,et al.  The processing of single words studied with positron emission tomography. , 1993, Annual review of neuroscience.

[24]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory , 1993, Nature.

[25]  M. Turvey,et al.  Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  Veronika Coltheart,et al.  When a ROWS is a ROSE: Phonological Effects in Written Word Comprehension , 1994 .

[27]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  L. Katz,et al.  Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language , 1995, Nature.

[29]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Dissociation of Storage and Rehearsal in Verbal Working Memory: Evidence From Positron Emission Tomography , 1996 .

[30]  A. Damasio,et al.  A neural basis for lexical retrieval , 1996, Nature.

[31]  N. Makris,et al.  MRI-Based Topographic Parcellation of Human Neocortex: An Anatomically Specified Method with Estimate of Reliability , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  M. Just,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Science.

[33]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[34]  C. Genovese,et al.  Functional Imaging Analysis Software — Computational Olio , 1996 .

[35]  R. Turner,et al.  Sentence Reading: A Functional MRI Study at 4 Tesla , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Human Brain Language Areas Identified by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  J. Fiez Phonology, Semantics, and the Role of the Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex , 2022 .

[38]  David Caplan,et al.  Effects of Syntactic Structure and Propositional Number on Patterns of Regional Cerebral Blood Flow , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  David Caplan,et al.  Localization of Syntactic Comprehension by Positron Emission Tomography , 1998, NeuroImage.

[40]  B. Horwitz,et al.  Functional connectivity of the angular gyrus in normal reading and dyslexia. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  J. Xiong,et al.  Evaluation of hemispheric dominance for language using functional MRI: A comparison with positron emission tomography , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[42]  S. Petersen,et al.  Neuroimaging studies of word reading. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  J. Desmond,et al.  The role of left prefrontal cortex in language and memory. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Human Brain Mapping 6:1–13(1998) � Functional MRI Studies of Auditory Comprehension , 2022 .

[45]  G. Waters,et al.  PET Studies of Syntactic Processing with Auditory Sentence Presentation , 1999, NeuroImage.

[46]  M. Just,et al.  Plasticity of language-related brain function during recovery from stroke. , 1999, Stroke.

[47]  B. Rosen,et al.  Auditory and visual word processing studied with fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[48]  M. Just,et al.  The neural bases of sentence comprehension: a fMRI examination of syntactic and lexical processing. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.