The role of visual search in the design of effective soft keyboards

As portable, handheld computing devices become more common, alternatives to traditional keyboards must be explored. These alternatives must be compact, lightweight and sufficiently efficient to support the users' tasks. One alternative is the use of small physical keyboards or soft keyboards presented on touch-sensitive surfaces. Many alternative layouts have been explored, including the QWERTY, Dvorak, telephone and various alphabetic organizations. Soukoreff and MacKenzie proposed a model to predict typing times for alternative layouts, but have experienced limited success matching their predictions to observed performance. This paper proposes a revision of the visual search component of their model that considers the familiarity of the organization and the number of letters represented by each key. Results are reported of an experiment that supports the claim that both familiarity and the number of letters per key must be considered when predicting visual search times for alternative keyboard layouts.

[1]  A. Welford Choice reaction time: Basic concepts , 1980 .

[2]  R. Hyman Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  Jan Noyes,et al.  The QWERTY Keyboard: A Review , 1983, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[4]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Investigating touchscreen typing: the effect of keyboard size on typing speed , 1993, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[5]  Roy T. Griffith The minimotion typewriter keyboard , 1949 .

[6]  Mary Jane Ford,et al.  Microcomputer keyboarding skills: Dvorak vs. Qwerty , 1992 .

[7]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Theoretical upper and lower bounds on typing speed using a stylus and a soft keyboard , 1995, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[8]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Text entry using soft keyboards , 1999, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[10]  Andrew Sears,et al.  Data Entry for Mobile Devices Using Soft Keyboards: Understanding the Effects of Keyboard Size and User Tasks , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  W. E. Hick Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[12]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The Psychology of Menu Selection: Designing Cognitive Control at the Human/Computer Interface , 1991 .

[13]  Catherine Plaisant,et al.  Touchscreen Interfaces for flexible alphanumeric data entry , 1998 .

[14]  T. K. Landauer,et al.  Selection from alphabetic and numeric menu trees using a touch screen: breadth, depth, and width , 1985, CHI '85.