Constraint Satisfaction Processes in Social Reasoning

We show that constraint satisfaction processes (coherence based reasoning) play an important role in social reasoning, and that social reasoning violates key assumptions of classic models of judgment and decision-making. Constraint satisfaction models predict a bi-directional flow of influence between evaluations of evidence for a judgment and the judgment itself, such that an evolving judgment can influence the evaluation of evidence. In contrast, models of judgment and decision-making, such as Bayesian models, SEU and Information Integration Theory assume that the direction of influence is only from the evaluations to the judgment. We examined two very different social reasoning tasks, a judgment about whether a young dating couple would get married, and a legal case about the guilt of a defendant charged with murder. In both studies, subjects exhibited strong coherence effects, such that the evaluation of evidence shifted over time to become more coherent with the final judgment. We note the similarity of constraint satisfaction models to classic cognitive consistency theories in social psychology, such as Cognitive Dissonance Theory.

[1]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[2]  The general theoretical situation. , 1938 .

[3]  J. Hopfield.  Neurons withgraded response havecollective computational properties likethoseoftwo-state neurons , 1984 .

[4]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Multialternative decision field theory: a dynamic connectionist model of decision making. , 2001, Psychological review.

[5]  S. Asch.  Max Wertheimer's contribution to modern psychology. , 1946 .

[6]  S. Read,et al.  Dissonance and balance in belief systems: The promise of parallel constraint satisfaction processes and connectionist modeling approaches. , 1994 .

[7]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[8]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The emergence of coherence over the course of decision making. , 2001 .

[9]  F. Harary,et al.  STRUCTURAL BALANCE: A GENERALIZATION OF HEIDER'S THEORY1 , 1977 .

[10]  S. Read,et al.  Connectionism, Parallel Constraint Satisfaction Processes, and Gestalt Principles: (Re)Introducing Cognitive Dynamics to Social Psychology , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[11]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Beliefs, Reasoning and Decision-making: Psycho-logic in Honor of Bob Abelson , 1994 .

[12]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Structural Dynamics of Cognition: From Consistency Theories to Constraint Satisfaction , 2002 .

[14]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction , 1999 .

[15]  M. J. Rosenberg,et al.  Attitude organization and change. An analysis of consistency among attitude components. , 1961 .

[16]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  A Coherence Model of Cognitive Consistency: Dynamics of Attitude Change During the Persian Gulf War , 1993 .

[17]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition : Psychological and Biological Models , 1986 .

[18]  N. Anderson.  Foundations of information integration theory , 1981 .

[19]  F. Heider.  ATTITUDES AND COGNITIVE ORGANIZATION , 1977 .

[20]  P. Thagard,et al.  Explanatory coherence , 1993 .

[21]  N. Pennington,et al.  Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making. , 1992 .

[22]  Barbara A. Spellman,et al.  If Saddam is Hitler then who is George Bush? Analogical mapping between systems of social roles , 1992 .

[23]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[24]  P. Thagard,et al.  Coherence in Thought and Action , 2000 .

[25]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Psychological and biological models , 1986 .

[26]  T. Shultz,et al.  Cognitive dissonance reduction as constraint satisfaction. , 1996, Psychological review.

[27]  M. Wertheimer.  Laws of organization in perceptual forms. , 1938 .

[28]  N. Anderson.  A Functional Theory of Cognition , 1996 .

[29]  D. Ewoldsen,et al.  Cognitive Dissonance , 2020, The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology.