3-D imaging with MDCT.

Without doubt, the greatest challenge of multidetector-row CT is dealing with 'data explosion'. For our carotid/intracranial CT angiograms, we routinely have 375 images to review (300 mm coverage reconstructed every 0.8 mm); for aortic studies we have 450-500 images ( approximately 600 mm coverage reconstructed every 1.3 mm); and for a study of the lower extremity inflow and run-off, we may generate 900-1000 transverse reconstructions. While we could reconstruct fewer images for these data, experience with single-detector row CT scanners indicates that longitudinal resolution and disease detection is improved when at least 50% overlap of cross-sections is generated [Radiology 200 (1996) 312]. If we are to optimize our clinical protocols and take full advantage of these CT scanners, we will need to change the way that we interpret, transfer, and store CT data. Film is no longer a viable option. Workstation based review of transverse reconstructions for interpretation is a necessity, but the workstations must improve to provide efficient access to these data, and we must have a way of providing our clinicians with images that can be transported to clinics and the operating room. Alternative visualization and analysis using volumetric tools, including 3-D visualization must evolve from luxury to necessity. We cannot rest on historical precedent to interpret these near isotropically sampled volumetric data using transverse reconstructions alone [Radiology 173 (1989) 527]. Although the tools for volumetric analysis on 3-D workstations have evolved over recent years, they have probably not yet evolved to a level that routine interpretation can be performed as efficiently and accurately as transverse section review. Both hardware and software developments must occur. While current computer workstations and visualization software are certainly adequate for assessing these MDCT data volumetrically, the process is very time consuming. What follows are a description of current workstation capabilities and a brief discussion of where development needs to go to facilitate the complete integration of volumetric analysis into the interpretive process of CT data.

[1]  H Rusinek,et al.  Volumetric rendering of MR images. , 1989, Radiology.

[2]  R B Jeffrey,et al.  Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: comparison of three-dimensional rendering techniques. , 1994, Radiology.

[3]  C F Beaulieu,et al.  Volume rendering of CT data: applications to the genitourinary tract. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  M Levoy,et al.  Methods for improving the efficiency and versatility of volume rendering. , 1991, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[5]  R H Choplin,et al.  Virtual Bronchoscopy: Relationships of Virtual Reality Endobronchial Simulations to Actual Bronchoscopic Findings , 1996 .

[6]  R. Ehman,et al.  Colorectal polyp detection with CT colography: two- versus three-dimensional techniques. Work in progress. , 1996, Radiology.

[7]  G. D. Rubin,et al.  Techniques of Reconstruction , 1996 .

[8]  G D Rubin,et al.  Volumetric analysis of volumetric data: achieving a paradigm shift. , 1996, Radiology.

[9]  D. McCauley,et al.  Volumetric (Helical/Spiral) CT (VCT) of the Airways , 1997, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[10]  V Argiro,et al.  Perspective volume rendering of CT and MR images: applications for endoscopic imaging. , 1996, Radiology.

[11]  David G. Heath,et al.  Skeletal 3-D CT: advantages of volume rendering over surface rendering , 1996, Skeletal Radiology.

[12]  D G Heath,et al.  Three-dimensional CT: real-time interactive volume rendering. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  C H McCollough,et al.  Detection of colorectal polyps by computed tomographic colography: feasibility of a novel technique. , 1996, Gastroenterology.

[14]  G D Rubin,et al.  STS-MIP: a new reconstruction technique for CT of the chest. , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[15]  Martine Rémy-Jardin,et al.  Spiral CT of the Chest , 1997 .

[16]  D J Vining,et al.  Tracheobronchial tree: three-dimensional spiral CT with bronchoscopic perspective. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  R Kikinis,et al.  3D surface rendered MR images of the brain and its vasculature. , 1991, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[18]  P M Silverman,et al.  Diagnosis of aortic dissection: value of helical CT with multiplanar reformation and three-dimensional rendering. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  David R. Stelts,et al.  CT cystoscopy: an innovation in bladder imaging. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  T. Mochizuki,et al.  Thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection: new endoscopic mode for three-dimensional CT display of aorta. , 1996, Radiology.

[21]  Reiner Lenz,et al.  Evaluation of methods for shaded surface display of CT volumes. , 1991 .

[22]  Pat Hanrahan,et al.  Volume Rendering , 2020, Definitions.

[23]  P. J. Keller,et al.  MR angiography with two-dimensional acquisition and three-dimensional display. Work in progress. , 1989, Radiology.

[24]  D Magid,et al.  Volumetric rendering techniques: applications for three-dimensional imaging of the hip. , 1987, Radiology.