Intracellular electroporation site distributions: Modeling examples for nsPEF and IRE pulse waveforms

We illustrate expected electroporation (EP) responses to two classes of large electric field pulses by employing systems models, one of a cell in vitro and the other of multiple cells in vivo. The first pulse class involves “nsPEF” (nanosecond pulsed electric fields). The durations are less than a microsecond, but the magnitudes are extremely large, often 10 kV/cm or more, and all of the pores remain small. The second class involves “IRE” (irreversible electroporation). Durations are many microseconds to several milliseconds, but with magnitudes smaller than 10 kV/cm, and a wide range of pore sizes evolves. A key feature of both pulse classes is non-thermal cell killing by multiple pulses without delivering external drugs or genes. For small pulses the models respond passively (no pore creation) providing negative controls. For larger pulses transient aqueous pore populations evolve. These greatly increase local membrane conductance temporarily, causing rapid redistribution of fields near and within cells. This complex electrical behavior is generally not revealed by experiments reporting biological end points resulting from cumulative ionic and molecular transport through cell membranes. The underlying, heterogeneous pore population distributions are also not obtained from typical experiments. Further, traditional EP applications involving molecular delivery are usually assumed to create pores solely in the outer, plasma membrane (PM). In contrast, our examples support the occurrence of intracellular EP by both nsPEF and IRE, but with different intracellular spatial distributions of EP sites.

[1]  A. T. Esser,et al.  Mechanisms for the intracellular manipulation of organelles by conventional electroporation. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[2]  Boris Rubinsky,et al.  Cancer Cells Ablation with Irreversible Electroporation , 2005, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[3]  Richard Nuccitelli,et al.  Optimized nanosecond pulsed electric field therapy can cause murine malignant melanomas to self‐destruct with a single treatment , 2010, International journal of cancer.

[4]  Boris Rubinsky,et al.  Tumor Ablation with Irreversible Electroporation , 2007, PloS one.

[5]  K. Schoenbach,et al.  Nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) effects on cells and tissues: apoptosis induction and tumor growth inhibition , 2001, PPPS-2001 Pulsed Power Plasma Science 2001. 28th IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science and 13th IEEE International Pulsed Power Conference. Digest of Papers (Cat. No.01CH37251).

[6]  A. T. Esser,et al.  Towards Solid Tumor Treatment by Irreversible Electroporation: Intrinsic Redistribution of Fields and Currents in Tissue , 2007, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[7]  K. Schoenbach,et al.  Intracellular effect of ultrashort electrical pulses , 2001, Bioelectromagnetics.

[8]  A. T. Esser,et al.  Towards Solid Tumor Treatment by Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields , 2009, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[9]  Rafael V. Davalos,et al.  Successful treatment of a large soft tissue sarcoma with irreversible electroporation. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  B. Rubinsky,et al.  Tissue Ablation with Irreversible Electroporation , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Laura Marcu,et al.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation and a case report of intense nanosecond pulsed electric field as a local therapy for human malignancies , 2007, International journal of cancer.