System integration and control design of a maglev platform for space vibration isolation

Micro-vibration has been a dominant factor impairing the performance of scientific experiments which are expected to be deployed in a micro-gravity environment such as a space laboratory. The micro-vibration has serious impact on the scientific experiments requiring a quasi-static environment. Therefore, we proposed a maglev vibration isolation platform operating in six degrees of freedom (DOF) to fulfill the environmental requirements. In view of the noncontact and large stroke requirement for micro-vibration isolation, an optimization method was utilized to design the actuator. Mathematical models of the actuator's remarkable nonlinearity were established, so that its output can be compensated according to a floater's varying position and a system's performance may be satisfied. Furthermore, aiming to adapt to an energy-limited environment such as space laboratory, an optimum allocation scheme was put forward, considering that the actuator's nonlinearity, accuracy, and minimum energy-consumption can be obtained simultaneously. In view of operating in 6-DOF, methods for nonlinear compensation and system decoupling were discussed, and the necessary controller was also presented. Simulation and experiments validate the system's performance. With a movement range of 10 × 10 × 8 mm and rotations of 200 mrad, the decay ratio of −40 dB/Dec between 1 and 10 Hz was obtained under close-loop control.

[1]  Lin Li,et al.  The influence of flywheel micro vibration on space camera and vibration suppression , 2018 .

[2]  Xingjian Jing,et al.  Recent advances in micro-vibration isolation , 2015 .

[3]  Rongqiang Liu,et al.  Measurement Model and Precision Analysis of Accelerometers for Maglev Vibration Isolation Platforms , 2015, Sensors.

[4]  Jie Gu,et al.  Six-axis nanopositioning device with precision magnetic levitation technology , 2004, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[5]  Qingsong Xu,et al.  Development and Assessment of a Novel Decoupled XY Parallel Micropositioning Platform , 2010, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[6]  Won-jong Kim,et al.  Nanoscale Motion Control With a Compact Minimum-Actuator Magnetic Levitator , 2005 .

[7]  Richard DeLombard,et al.  Microgravity Environment Characterization Program , 1997 .

[8]  Wen-Hong Zhu,et al.  On active acceleration control of vibration isolation systems , 2006 .

[9]  Mark Campbell,et al.  Sensors and control of a space-based six-axis vibration isolation system , 2004 .

[10]  Mei-Yung Chen,et al.  Design and Implementation of a New Six-DOF Maglev Positioner With a Fluid Bearing , 2011, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[11]  D. Kamesh,et al.  Modeling, design and analysis of low frequency platform for attenuating micro-vibration in spacecraft , 2010 .

[12]  Wen-Hong Zhu,et al.  On active acceleration control of vibration isolation systems , 2006, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[13]  J. Spanos,et al.  A soft 6-axis active vibration isolator , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference - ACC'95.

[14]  Eric Rogers,et al.  Model building and verification for active control of microvibrations with probabilistic assessment of the effects of uncertainties , 2004 .

[15]  S. C. Southward,et al.  Active Control of Noise and Vibration , 1996 .

[16]  Tor Arne Johansen,et al.  Constrained nonlinear control allocation with singularity avoidance using sequential quadratic programming , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[17]  Scott D. Snyder,et al.  Active Control of Noise and Vibration Second Edition Volume 1 , 2012 .

[18]  Manfredi Maggiore,et al.  Path following using transverse feedback linearization: Application to a maglev positioning system , 2009, 2009 American Control Conference.

[19]  Jian-Xin Xu,et al.  High-Performance Tracking of Piezoelectric Positioning Stage Using Current-Cycle Iterative Learning Control With Gain Scheduling , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[20]  Zongquan Deng,et al.  Parametric Design and Multiobjective Optimization of Maglev Actuators for Active Vibration Isolation System , 2014 .

[21]  Wei Wei,et al.  Study on the sliding mode control system for air gap of electrical Maglev based on the feedback linearization , 2008, 2008 7th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation.

[22]  Paul J. Remington,et al.  Active Control of Noise and Vibration , 2007 .

[23]  Rongqiang Liu,et al.  Study of space micro-vibration active isolation platform acceleration measurement , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA).

[24]  G Richardson,et al.  A 2-collinear-DoF strut with embedded negative-resistance electromagnetic shunt dampers for spacecraft micro-vibration , 2017 .

[25]  C. Stavrinidis,et al.  ESA microgravity and microdynamics activities — An overview , 1993 .

[26]  Tadahiko Shinshi,et al.  Development of a maglev lens driving actuator for off-axis control and adjustment of the focal point in laser beam machining , 2013 .

[27]  Won-jong Kim,et al.  Multiaxis Maglev Positioner With Nanometer Resolution Over Extended Travel Range , 2007 .

[28]  Ralph L. Hollis,et al.  A six-degree-of-freedom magnetically levitated variable compliance fine-motion wrist: design, modeling, and control , 1991, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[29]  Yanhao Chen,et al.  Simulation and experiment on the performance of a passive/active micro-vibration isolator , 2018 .

[30]  G Richardson,et al.  Design and verification of a negative resistance electromagnetic shunt damper for spacecraft micro-vibration , 2017 .

[31]  Ying Wu,et al.  Dynamic isotropy design and analysis of a six-DOF active micro-vibration isolation manipulator on satellites , 2018 .

[32]  André Preumont,et al.  A six-axis single-stage active vibration isolator based on Stewart platform , 2005 .

[33]  João Borges de Sousa,et al.  Optimum Allocation For Multiple Thrusters , 1999 .