Bioremediation of diesel-contaminated soils: Evaluation of potential in situ techniques by study of bacterial degradation

The development of a simple laboratory methodology allows theimplementation of in situbioremediation of polluted soils with diesel fuel. In thisinvestigation microbiological and chemical analyses and a suitable bioreactor design, were veryuseful for suggesting the best ways to improve biodegradation extents in a diesel-enrichedsoil. Biostimulation with inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus produced the best resultsin a simple bioreactor, with biodegradation extents higher than 90% after 45 days. Also,the addition of activated sludge from a domestic wastewater plant increased the degradationrate to a great extent. In both cases, microbiological studies showed the presence ofAcinetobacter sp. degrading most of thehydrocarbons. Simultaneously, a diesel fuel release(approximately 400,000 l) was studied. Samples taken in polluted soil and water revealed thatbacteria from the genus Acinetobacterwere predominant. In plate studies, Acinetobacter coloniesproduced a whitish substance with the characteristics of a biosurfactant. Remarkably, thepresence of this product was evident at the field site, both in the riverbanks and in the physicalrecovery plant. The study of the similarities between laboratory results and the diesel spillsite strongly suggested that natural conditions at the field site allowed the implementationof in situ bioremediation after physical removal of LNAPL (light nonaqueous-phase liquids).

[1]  R. Bartha,et al.  Bioremediation Potential of Terrestrial Fuel Spills , 1990, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[2]  R. Halden,et al.  Biodegradation of Dioxin-Related Compounds: A Review , 1997 .

[3]  A. Bauer,et al.  Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. , 1966, American journal of clinical pathology.

[4]  Ibrahim M. Banat,et al.  Microbial production of surfactants and their commercial potential. , 1997 .

[5]  G. Bennett Handbook of chemical property estimation methods: Environmental behaviour of organic compounds , 1992 .

[6]  O. Amund Utilization and degradation of an ester-based synthetic lubricant by Acinetobacter lwoffi , 1996, Biodegradation.

[7]  F. Rojo,et al.  Characterization of bacterial strains able to grow on high molecular mass residues from crude oil processing. , 2000, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[8]  J. Walworth,et al.  Bioremediation of a Petroleum-Contaminated Cryic Soil: Effects of Phosphorus, Nitrogen, and Temperature , 1995 .

[9]  R. King,et al.  Practical environmental bioremediation : the field guide , 1998 .

[10]  M. J. Geerdink,et al.  Biodegradability of diesel oil , 1996, Biodegradation.

[11]  W. Rulkens,et al.  Microbiological aspects of surfactant use for biological soil remediation , 1997, Biodegradation.

[12]  John T. Wilson,et al.  Implementation of natural attenuation at a JP-4 jet fuel release after active remediation , 2004, Biodegradation.

[13]  J. Spain Synthetic Chemicals with Potential for Natural Attenuation , 1997 .

[14]  D. Herson,et al.  Laboratory biotreatability studies. , 1994 .

[15]  C. H. Ward,et al.  Handbook of Bioremediation , 1993 .

[16]  I. Head,et al.  Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants in marine habitats. , 1999, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[17]  R. Borden,et al.  Anaerobic Biodegradation of Alkylbenzenes in Laboratory Microcosms Representing Ambient Conditions , 1997 .

[18]  C. A. Fewson,et al.  Acinetobacter : Portrait of a Genus , 1991 .

[19]  H. Paerl,et al.  Stimulation of Diesel Fuel Biodegradation by Indigenous Nitrogen Fixing Bacterial Consortia , 1999, Microbial Ecology.

[20]  I. Head Bioremediation: towards a credible technology. , 1998, Microbiology.

[21]  Farid Salama,et al.  Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons , 1965, Nature.

[22]  Judith L. Sims,et al.  In-situ bioremediation of contaminated ground water , 1992 .

[23]  G. Sayler,et al.  Monitoring the efficacy of bioremediation. , 1993, Trends in biotechnology.

[24]  T. Viraraghavan,et al.  A bench-scale investigation of land treatment of soil contaminated with diesel fuel. , 1999, Chemosphere.

[25]  J. Trevors,et al.  Selected factors limiting the microbial degradation of recalcitrant compounds , 1993, Journal of Industrial Microbiology.

[26]  B. Lal,et al.  Degradation of crude oil by Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Alcaligenes odorans. , 1996, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[27]  Katherine H. Baker,et al.  Bioremediation of surface and subsurface soils. , 1994 .

[28]  W. F. Reehl,et al.  Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods: Environmental Behavior of Organic Compounds , 1982 .

[29]  M. Gealt,et al.  Biodegradation and Bioremediation. , 1996 .

[30]  Jong-in Dong,et al.  Remediation of petroleum-contaminated soils by fluidized thermal desorption , 1998 .

[31]  R. Swannell,et al.  Field evaluations of marine oil spill bioremediation. , 1996, Microbiological reviews.

[32]  M. J. Shannon,et al.  Evaluating bioremediation: distinguishing fact from fiction. , 1993, Annual review of microbiology.

[33]  W. Lyman Handbook of chemical property estimation methods , 1982 .

[34]  Eve Riser-Roberts,et al.  Bioremediation of Petroleum Contaminated Sites , 1992 .

[35]  E. Ron,et al.  Bioremediation: Bioremediation of petroleum contamination , 1996 .

[36]  Carl E. Cerniglia,et al.  Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons , 1992, Biodegradation.