Gap detection in single- and multiple-channel stimuli by LAURA cochlear implantees.

Gap-detection thresholds were determined for different complex patterns of electrical stimulation in four postlingually deafened LAURA cochlear implantees, to examine the nature of within- and across-channel auditory processes in more detail. Gap detectability was examined as a function of stimulus complexity (one, two, or three channels), channel distance within and across multichannel pre- and post-gap markers, stimulus asymmetry, and pulse rate. All markers roved in duration from 200 to 500 ms to ensure that subjects were not using overall stimulus duration as a cue. Gap-detection thresholds for all subjects were short (< 5 ms) when the pre- and post-gap markers stimulated the same single or multiple channels, even when the distance between simultaneously stimulated channels was large (exp. 1). For some subjects, gap detectability was more difficult in the across-channel condition, when the pre- and post-gap markers each stimulated different channels, although performance improved substantially in most subjects after extensive training (exp. 2). Additional tests with random maskers also suggest that neural interaction only affects performance mildly, and that the magnitude of the gap-detection threshold probably depends more on the subject's cognitive (in)ability to attend to the temporal gap than on the temporal acuity of their auditory system. Other stimulus conditions showed a difference in performance related to the order of the markers: gap thresholds were longer when the pre-gap marker stimulated one channel and the post-gap marker stimulated two or more channels, than vice versa (exp. 3). In addition, gap thresholds of three of the subjects increased with decreasing pulse rate from 1250 to 400 pps, a finding which may be related to the rate of the speech processing strategies used by each individual implantee (exp. 4).

[1]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  David R. Perrott,et al.  Temporal Resolution of Tonal Pulses , 1972 .

[3]  Walt Jesteadt,et al.  The relation between gap discrimination and auditory stream segregation , 1982 .

[4]  Norbert Dillier,et al.  Some aspects of temporal coding for single-channel electrical stimulation of the cochlea , 1985, Hearing Research.

[5]  B C Moore,et al.  Gap detection with sinusoids and noise in normal, impaired, and electrically stimulated ears. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  R. Tyler,et al.  Temporal-gap detection by cochlear prosthesis users. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  R V Shannon,et al.  Detection of gaps in sinusoids and pulse trains by patients with cochlear implants. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  D M Green,et al.  Temporal gaps in noise and sinusoids. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  J H Grose Gap detection in multiple narrow bands of noise as a function of spectral configuration. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  C. Formby,et al.  Detection of silent temporal gaps in narrow‐band noise stimuli having second‐formantlike properties of voiceless stop/vowel combinations , 1991 .

[11]  T. G. Forrest,et al.  Detection of silent temporal gaps in sinusoidal markers. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Joseph W. Hall,et al.  Gap detection in a narrow band of noise in the presence of a flanking band of noise , 1993 .

[13]  S Peeters,et al.  The Laura cochlear implant programmed with the continuous interleaved and phase-locked continuous interleaved strategies. , 1993, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[14]  R. Carlyon,et al.  Intensity discrimination under forward and backward masking: role of referential coding. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  J H Grose,et al.  Gap detection for pairs of noise bands: effects of stimulus level and frequency separation. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  D P Phillips,et al.  Detection of silent intervals between noises activating different perceptual channels: some properties of "central" auditory gap detection. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  D P Phillips,et al.  "Central" auditory gap detection: a spatial case. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  C. Formby,et al.  Temporal gap detection measured with multiple sinusoidal markers: effects of marker number, frequency, and temporal position. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  J J Hanekom,et al.  Gap detection as a measure of electrode interaction in cochlear implants. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  R. Shannon,et al.  Within-channel gap detection using dissimilar markers in cochlear implant listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  A van Wieringen,et al.  Natural vowel and consonant recognition by Laura cochlear implantees. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[22]  G M Clark,et al.  Gap detection by early-deafened cochlear-implant subjects. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.