Influence of the Sun Position and Platform Orientation on the Quality of Imagery Obtained from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Images acquired at a low altitude can be the source of accurate information about various environmental phenomena. Often, however, this information is distorted by various factors, so a correction of the images needs to be performed to recreate the actual reflective properties of the imaged area. Due to the low flight altitude, the correction of images from UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles) is usually limited to noise reduction and detector errors. The article shows the influence of the Sun position and platform deviation angles on the quality of images obtained by UAVs. Tilting the camera placed on an unmanned platform leads to incorrect exposures of imagery, and the order of this distortion depends on the position of the Sun during imaging. An image can be considered in three-dimensional space, where the x and y coordinates determine the position of the pixel and the third dimension determines its exposure. This assumption is the basis for the proposed method of image exposure compensation. A three-dimensional transformation by rotation is used to determine the adjustment matrix to correct the image quality. The adjustments depend on the angles of the platform and the difference between the direction of flight and the position of the Sun. An additional factor regulates the value of the adjustment depending on the ratio of the pitch and roll angles. The experiments were carried out for two sets of data obtained with different unmanned systems. The correction method used can improve the block exposure by up to 60%. The method gives the best results for simple systems, not equipped with lighting compensation systems.

[1]  E. Honkavaara,et al.  SPECTRAL IMAGING FROM UAVS UNDER VARYING ILLUMINATION CONDITIONS , 2013 .

[2]  Hongguang Li,et al.  Haze removal for UAV reconnaissance images using layered scattering model , 2016 .

[3]  Joonki Paik,et al.  Wavelength-Adaptive Dehazing Using Histogram Merging-Based Classification for UAV Images , 2015, Sensors.

[4]  Jan Hanus,et al.  Radiometric and Atmospheric Corrections of Multispectral μMCA Camera for UAV Spectroscopy , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[5]  Teemu Hakala,et al.  Acquisition of Bidirectional Reflectance Factor Dataset Using a Micro Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and a Consumer Camera , 2010, Remote. Sens..

[6]  A. Gillespie,et al.  Topographic Normalization of Landsat TM Images of Forest Based on Subpixel Sun–Canopy–Sensor Geometry , 1998 .

[7]  Zixuan Qiu,et al.  Application of UAV Photogrammetric System for Monitoring Ancient Tree Communities in Beijing , 2018, Forests.

[8]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Sensor Correction of a 6-Band Multispectral Imaging Sensor for UAV Remote Sensing , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[9]  P. Teillet,et al.  On the Slope-Aspect Correction of Multispectral Scanner Data , 1982 .

[10]  Srikanth Saripalli,et al.  Ecohydrology with unmanned aerial vehicles , 2014 .

[11]  François Cavayas,et al.  Modelling and Correction of Topographic Effect Using Multi-Temporal Satellite Images , 1987 .

[12]  Heikki Saari,et al.  A Process for Radiometric Correction of UAV Image Blocks Verfahren zur radiometrischen Korrektur von UAV Bildblöcken , 2012 .

[13]  C. Conese.  Topographic normalization of TM scenes through the use of an atmospheric correction method and digital terrain model , 1993 .

[14]  Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Unmanned Aerial System multispectral mapping for low and variable solar irradiance conditions: Potential of tensor decomposition , 2019, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[15]  Heikki Saari,et al.  Processing and Assessment of Spectrometric, Stereoscopic Imagery Collected Using a Lightweight UAV Spectral Camera for Precision Agriculture , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[16]  Damian Wierzbicki,et al.  Method of radiometric quality assessment of NIR images acquired with a custom sensor mounted on an unmanned aerial vehicle , 2018 .

[17]  Damian Wierzbicki,et al.  Influence of Lower Atmosphere on the Radiometric Quality of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Imagery , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[18]  Craig A. Coburn,et al.  SCS+C: a modified Sun-canopy-sensor topographic correction in forested terrain , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[19]  Eija Honkavaara,et al.  Radiometric Correction of Close-Range Spectral Image Blocks Captured Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle with a Radiometric Block Adjustment , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[20]  Daniel S. Kimes,et al.  Modeling the Effects of Various Radiant Transfers in Mountainous Terrain on Sensor Response , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[21]  M. Minnaert.  The reciprocity principle in lunar photometry , 1941 .

[22]  Qing Liu,et al.  A physical-based atmospheric correction algorithm of unmanned aerial vehicles images and its utility analysis , 2017 .

[23]  Richard Gloaguen,et al.  The Need for Accurate Geometric and Radiometric Corrections of Drone-Borne Hyperspectral Data for Mineral Exploration: MEPHySTo - A Toolbox for Pre-Processing Drone-Borne Hyperspectral Data , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[24]  S. Sandmeier,et al.  Radiometric corrections of topographically induced effects on Landsat TM data in an alpine environment , 1993 .

[25]  T. Lin,et al.  The Lambertian assumption and Landsat data. , 1980 .

[26]  P. Rajendran,et al.  Modelling of solar irradiance and daylight duration for solar-powered UAV sizing , 2016 .

[27]  P. Deschamps,et al.  Evaluation of topographic effects in remotely sensed data , 1989 .