Effects of light on the behaviour of brown trout (Salmo trutta) encountering accelerating flow: Application to downstream fish passage

Avoidance of abrupt accelerations of flow exhibited by downstream migrating fish at screens used to divert them, or at fishway entrances, can cause delay and adversely impact efficiency. The use of alternative stimuli to attract fish and mask the unwanted deterrent effects associated with velocity gradients is of interest to those working in fish passage engineering. The influence of a continuous light source on the downstream movement of brown trout (Salmo trutta) as they encountered accelerating velocities created by a constricted channel in an experimental flume under three discharge regimes was assessed. It was predicted that: (1) in the absence of a light source, behavioural responses typical of downstream moving salmonids would be elicited on encountering velocity gradients, and that these responses would be initiated at some threshold spatial velocity gradient relative to body length and (2) light would act as an attractant and mask the deterrent effects of a velocity gradient and thus reduce delay. Typical avoidance behaviours, e.g. rheotactic switches in orientation or retreating upstream before re-approaching a velocity gradient, were common. The spatial velocity gradient threshold at which a response was initiated when dark was similar (ca. 0.4 cm s?1 cm?1) independent of discharge. Fish responded farther upstream at a lower spatial velocity gradient threshold (ca. 0.2 cm s?1 cm?1) in the presence of both mechanosensory and visual cues when light. Contrary to the second prediction, downstream movement was further delayed by the addition of a light stimulus. The findings support an alternate hypothesis, that responsiveness (avoidance) can be enhanced when multimodal stimuli are presented.

[1]  James J. Anderson,et al.  Response of Juvenile Coho and Chinook Salmon to Strobe and Mercury Vapor Lights , 1992 .

[2]  L. Greenberg,et al.  Effect of trash diverters and overhead cover on downstream migrating brown trout smolts , 2012 .

[3]  B. Kynard,et al.  Evaluation of a Bypass System for Spent American Shad at Holyoke Dam, Massachusetts , 1993 .

[4]  Olle Calles,et al.  Evaluating technical improvements for downstream migrating diadromous fish at a hydroelectric plant , 2012 .

[5]  Thomas J. Carlson,et al.  Application of Sound and other Stimuli to Control Fish Behavior , 1998 .

[6]  Theodore Castro-Santos,et al.  Effect of Water Acceleration on Downstream Migratory Behavior and Passage of Atlantic Salmon Smolts and Juvenile American Shad at Surface Bypasses , 1998 .

[7]  F. Travade,et al.  THINKING LIKE A FISH: A KEY INGREDIENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF EFFECTIVE FISH PASSAGE FACILITIES AT RIVER OBSTRUCTIONS , 2012 .

[8]  M. Marchesan,et al.  Behavioural effects of artificial light on fish species of commercial interest , 2005 .

[9]  Paul S. Kemp,et al.  Advancing provision of multi-species fish passage: Behaviour of adult European eel (Anguilla anguilla) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) in response to accelerating flow , 2011 .

[10]  I. Cowx Innovations in Fish Passage Technology , 2000 .

[11]  James J. Anderson,et al.  Quantifying behaviour of migratory fish: Application of signal detection theory to fisheries engineering , 2012 .

[12]  G. T. Haymes,et al.  Attraction of fish to mercury vapour light and its application in a generating station forebay , 1984 .

[13]  John G. Williams,et al.  Survival of Juvenile Salmonids Passing through Bypass Systems, Turbines, and Spillways with and without Flow Deflectors at Snake River Dams , 2001 .

[14]  Martyn C. Lucas,et al.  Migration of Freshwater Fishes , 2001 .

[15]  Sarah R Partan,et al.  Issues in the Classification of Multimodal Communication Signals , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[16]  Paul S. Kemp,et al.  Fine-Scale Behavioral Responses of Pacific Salmonid Smolts as They Encounter Divergence and Acceleration of Flow , 2005 .

[17]  J. Diamond,et al.  Startle-response in Teleost Fish: an Elementary Circuit for Neural Discrimination , 1968, Nature.

[18]  Mary Ann Simmons,et al.  Characterization of Gatewell Orifice Lighting at the Bonneville Dam Second Powerhouse and Compendium of Research on Light Guidance with Juvenile Salmonids , 2007 .

[19]  M. Beach Fish pass design - criteria for the design and approval of fish passes and other structures to facilitate the passage of migratory fish in rivers , 1984 .

[20]  C. Schilt Developing fish passage and protection at hydropower dams , 2007 .

[21]  Charles C. Coutant,et al.  Downstream passage for salmon at hydroelectric projects in the Columbia river basin: Development, installation, and evaluation , 1997 .

[22]  John G. Williams,et al.  Illumination influences the ability of migrating juvenile salmonids to pass a submerged experimental weir , 2009 .

[23]  Christos Katopodis,et al.  The development of fish passage research in a historical context , 2012 .

[24]  S. Partan,et al.  Wild tree squirrels respond with multisensory enhancement to conspecific robot alarm behaviour , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  P. Johnson,et al.  Effectiveness of Strobe Lights and an Infrasound Device for Eliciting Avoidance by Juvenile Salmon , 2001 .

[26]  N. Kouwen,et al.  Use of telemetry and hydraulic modeling to evaluate and improve fish guidance efficiency at a louver and bypass system for downstream-migrating Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolts and kelts , 2002, Hydrobiologia.

[27]  S. Schmutz,et al.  Fish Migration and Fish Bypasses , 1998 .

[28]  B. Kynard,et al.  Guidance of Yearling Shortnose and Pallid Sturgeon Using Vertical Bar Rack and Louver Arrays , 2001 .

[29]  John G. Williams,et al.  The behaviour of Pacific salmonid smolts during passage over two experimental weirs under light and dark conditions , 2006 .

[30]  Dean A. Brege,et al.  Juvenile Salmonid Guidance at the Bonneville Dam Second Powerhouse, Columbia River, 1983–1989 , 1991 .

[31]  Christopher T. Lovelace,et al.  An irrelevant light enhances auditory detection in humans: a psychophysical analysis of multisensory integration in stimulus detection. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[32]  J. S. Welton,et al.  The efficacy of air, sound and acoustic bubble screens in deflecting Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., smolts in the River Frome, UK , 2002 .

[33]  C. Bunt Fishway entrance modifications enhance fish attraction , 2001 .

[34]  Michael H. Gessel,et al.  Development of successful fish passage structures for downstream migrants requires knowledge of their behavioural response to accelerating flow. , 2009 .

[35]  M Larinier,et al.  Upstream and Downstream Fish Passage Experience in France , 1998 .

[36]  M. Larinier,et al.  Downstream migration: problems and facilities , 2002 .

[37]  A. Agostinho,et al.  Conservation of the Biodiversity of Brazil's Inland Waters , 2005 .

[38]  A. Koed,et al.  Swimming performance of wild and F1-hatchery-reared Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) smolts , 2008 .

[39]  A. Haro,et al.  Quantifying migratory delay: a new application of survival analysis methods , 2003 .

[40]  D. Bates,et al.  Use of Louvers for Guiding Fish , 1957 .