Adaptation Planning Support Toolbox: Measurable performance information based tools for co-creation of resilient, ecosystem-based urban plans with urban designers, decision-makers and stakeholders

Abstract Currently, most tools, guidelines and benchmarks for urban adaptation raise awareness on climate change impacts, assess the city’s vulnerability and/or address the need for adaptation on a policy-level. However, tools that have the ability to implement adaptation solutions in the actual urban planning and design practice seem to be missing. We developed and tested the Adaptation Planning Support Toolbox (APST) to fill this gap. This toolbox supports local policymakers, planners, designers and practitioners in defining the program of demands, in setting adaptation targets, in selecting from more than 60 blue, green and grey adaptation measures and with informed co-creation of conceptual adaptation plans. The APST provides quantitative, evidence-based performance information on (cost)effectiveness of adaptation measures regarding climate resilience and co-benefits. The APST can be used design workshops, to feed dialogues among stakeholders on where and how which ecosystem-based adaptation measures can be applied. Applications of the AST in various settings and context in cities on different continents have illustrated the added value of the toolbox in bringing policy and practice together with help of science. With more and more cities worldwide that will make the step from policymaking to actual adaptation-inclusive urban (re)development practice we foresee a growing demand for such tools.

[1]  J. Gupta,et al.  The split ladder of participation: A diagnostic, strategic, and evaluation tool to assess when participation is necessary , 2015 .

[2]  Tejo Spit,et al.  Overview of challenges and achievements in the climate adaptation of cities and in the Climate Proof Cities program , 2015 .

[3]  Thomas Johnson,et al.  A decision inventory approach for improving decision support for climate change impact assessment and adaptation , 2007 .

[4]  Andreas Kontoleon,et al.  Review of the evidence base for ecosystem-based approaches for adaptation to climate change , 2012, Environmental Evidence.

[5]  J. Hay,et al.  Coastal Systems and Low-Lying Areas , 2014 .

[6]  J. Lamond,et al.  Cities and Flooding: A Guide to Integrated Urban Flood Risk Management for the 21st Century , 2012 .

[7]  S. Déry,et al.  Planning for climate change adaptation: lessons learned from a community-based workshop , 2012 .

[8]  Neil Powell,et al.  A framework for facilitating dialogue between policy planners and local climate change adaptation professionals: Cases from Sweden, Canada and Indonesia , 2012 .

[9]  Stan Geertman,et al.  Potentials for Planning Support: A Planning-Conceptual Approach , 2006 .

[10]  H. Staats,et al.  Preference for Nature in Urbanized Societies: Stress, Restoration, and the Pursuit of Sustainability , 2007 .

[11]  Reza Ardakanian,et al.  Rethinking Infrastructure Design , 2015 .

[12]  S. Garvin,et al.  Urban Flood Management , 2010 .

[13]  Sukaina Bharwani,et al.  PROVIA Guidance on Assessing Vulnerability, Impacts and Adaptation to Climate Change , 2013 .

[14]  Rutger van der Brugge,et al.  Linking water policy innovation and urban renewal: The case of Rotterdam, the Netherlands , 2010 .

[15]  Johanna Nalau,et al.  Is adaptation a local responsibility , 2015 .

[16]  M. Pelling.  Adaptation to Climate Change: From Resilience to Transformation , 2010 .

[17]  Peter Steen Mikkelsen,et al.  A Mapping of Tools for Informing Water Sensitive Urban Design Planning Decisions—Questions, Aspects and Context Sensitivity , 2015 .

[18]  Tejo Spit,et al.  A user perspective on the gap between science and decision-making. Local administrators’ views on expert knowledge in urban planning , 2015 .

[19]  J. Kind,et al.  Economically efficient flood protection standards for the Netherlands , 2014 .

[20]  Rebekah R. Brown,et al.  Transitioning to Water Sensitive Cities: Historical Current and Future Transition States , 2008 .

[21]  Ingegärd Eliasson,et al.  The use of climate knowledge in urban planning , 2000 .

[22]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007 : impacts, adaptation and vulnerability , 2001 .

[23]  Stephane Hallegatte,et al.  Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change , 2009 .

[24]  Patrick Scherhaufer,et al.  Scientist–stakeholder workshops: A collaborative approach for integrating science and decision-making in Austrian flood-prone municipalities , 2016 .

[25]  Magdalena van den Berg,et al.  Health benefits of green spaces in the living environment: A systematic review of epidemiological studies , 2015 .

[26]  Nick van de Giesen,et al.  Alternative water management options to reduce vulnerability for climate change in the Netherlands , 2009 .

[27]  Ilse M. Voskamp,et al.  Planning support system for climate adaptation: Composing effective sets of blue-green measures to reduce urban vulnerability to extreme weather events , 2015 .

[28]  Stan Geertman,et al.  Using MapTable® to Learn About Sustainable Urban Development , 2013 .