Priming of object categorization within and across levels of specificity

Identification of objects can occur at different levels of specificity. Depending on task and context, an object can be classified at the superordinate level (as an animal), at the basic level (a bird) or at the subordinate level (a sparrow). What are the interactions between these representational levels and do they rely on the same sequential processes that lead to successful object identification? In this electroencephalogram study, a task-switching paradigm (covert naming or living/non-living judgment) was used. Images of objects were repeated either within the same task, or with a switch from a covert naming task to a living or non-living judgment and vice versa. While covert naming accesses entrylevel (basic or subordinate), living/non-living judgments rely on superordinate classification. Our behavioral results demonstrated clear priming effects within both tasks. However, asymmetries were found when task-switching had occurred, with facilitation for covert naming but not for categorization. We also found lower accuracy and early-starting and persistent enhancements of event-related potentials (ERPs) for covert naming, indicating that this task was more difficult and involved more intense perceptual and semantic processing. Perceptual priming was marked by consistent reductions of the ERP component L1 for repeated presentations, both with and without task switching. Additional repetition effects were found in early event-related activity between 150-190 ms (N1) when a repeated image had been named at initial presentation. We conclude that differences in N1 indicate task-related changes in the identification process itself. Such enhancements for covert naming again emerge in a later time window associated with depth of semantic processing. Meanwhile, L1 reflects modulations due to implicit memory of objects. In conclusion, evidence was found for representational overlap; changes in ERP markers started early and revealed cross-task priming at the level of object structure analysis and more intense perceptual and semantic processing for covert naming.

[1]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Effects of picture repetition on induced gamma band responses, evoked potentials, and phase synchrony in the human EEG. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  Alex Martin,et al.  Modulation of neural activity during object naming: effects of time and practice. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  Jasna Martinovic,et al.  Induced Gamma Band Responses Predict Recognition Delays during Object Identification , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  Jasna Martinovic,et al.  Induced gamma-band activity is related to the time point of object identification , 2008, Brain Research.

[5]  T. Penney,et al.  Repetition related ERP effects in a visual object target detection task. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[6]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Selective visual-spatial attention alters induced gamma band responses in the human EEG , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  J. Rodd,et al.  Processing Objects at Different Levels of Specificity , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  T. Carr,et al.  Words, pictures, and priming: on semantic activation, conscious identification, and the automaticity of information processing. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Oscillatory brain activity dissociates between associative stimulus content in a repetition priming task in the human EEG. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  T. Shallice,et al.  Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming. , 2000, Science.

[11]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Pictures and names: Making the connection , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  A cross-laboratory study of event-related gamma activity in a standard object recognition paradigm , 2006, NeuroImage.

[13]  Stephen J. Johnston,et al.  Fixation locations during three-dimensional object recognition are predicted by image segmentation points at concave surface intersections , 2010 .

[14]  Dave Bartram,et al.  The role of visual and semantic codes in object naming , 1974 .

[15]  C A Grimbergen,et al.  High-quality recording of bioelectric events , 1991, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[16]  S. Palmer.  Vision Science : Photons to Phenomenology , 1999 .

[17]  Jasna Martinovic,et al.  Coding of Visual Object Features and Feature Conjunctions in the Human Brain , 2008, PloS one.

[18]  R. Johnston,et al.  Effects of age of acquisition, age, and repetition priming on object naming , 2006 .

[19]  M. Kutas,et al.  Electrophysiological estimates of semantic and syntactic information access during tacit picture naming and listening to words , 2001, Neuroscience Research.

[20]  W. Francis,et al.  Decomposition of repetition priming components in picture naming. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  Christian J Fiebach,et al.  Neuronal Mechanisms of Repetition Priming in Occipitotemporal Cortex: Spatiotemporal Evidence from Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Electroencephalography , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  O. Bertrand,et al.  Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Oscillatory brain activity in the human EEG during indirect and direct memory tasks , 2006, Brain Research.

[24]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[25]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[26]  M. D Rugg,et al.  The effect of repetition lag on electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of visual object priming , 2004, NeuroImage.

[27]  I. Nelken,et al.  Transient Induced Gamma-Band Response in EEG as a Manifestation of Miniature Saccades , 2008, Neuron.

[28]  C. A. Grimbergen,et al.  HIGH QUALITY RECORDING OF BIOELECTRIC EVENTS . I : INTERFERENCE REDUCTION , THEORY AND PRACTICE , 2009 .

[29]  Andreas Keil,et al.  Neuronal Synchronization and Selective Color Processing in the Human Brain , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[31]  Jennifer A. Mangels,et al.  Evaluating models of object-decision priming: evidence from event-related potential repetition effects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  B. Rossion,et al.  Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's Object Pictorial Set: The Role of Surface Detail in Basic-Level Object Recognition , 2004, Perception.

[33]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Cognitive Neuroscience: Tracking the time course of object categorization using event-related potentials , 1999 .

[35]  E. Vogel,et al.  The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[36]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Neurophysiological Evidence for the Time Course of Activation of Global Shape, Part, and Local Contour Representations during Visual Object Categorization and Memory , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Repetition suppression of induced gamma band responses is eliminated by task switching , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[38]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Modulation of oscillatory brain activity and evoked potentials in a repetition priming task in the human EEG , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[39]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies. , 2000, Psychophysiology.