Successive-station monthly streamflow prediction using different artificial neural network algorithms

In this study, applicability of successive-station prediction models, as a practical alternative to streamflow prediction in poor rain gauge catchments, has been investigated using monthly streamflow records of two successive stations on Çoruh River, Turkey. For this goal, at the first stage, based on eight different successive-station prediction scenarios, feed-forward back-propagation (FFBP) neural network algorithm has been applied as a brute search tool to find out the best scenario for the river. Then, two other artificial neural network (ANN) techniques, namely generalized regression neural network (GRNN) and radial basis function (RBF) algorithms, were used to generate two new ANN models for the selected scenario. Ultimately, a comparative performance study between the different algorithms has been performed using Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency, squared correlation coefficient, and root-mean-square error measures. The results indicated a promising role of successive-station methodology in monthly streamflow prediction. Performance analysis showed that only 1-month-lagged record of both stations was satisfactory to achieve accurate models with high-efficiency value. It is also found that the RBF network resulted in higher performance than FFBP and GRNN in our study domain.

[1]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  Two hybrid Artificial Intelligence approaches for modeling rainfall–runoff process , 2011 .

[2]  Vahid Nourani,et al.  An ANN‐based model for spatiotemporal groundwater level forecasting , 2008 .

[3]  Ercan Kahya,et al.  Daily streamflow modelling using autoregressive moving average and artificial neural networks models: case study of Çoruh basin, Turkey , 2012 .

[4]  Ercan Kahya,et al.  Flow forecast by SWAT model and ANN in Pracana basin, Portugal , 2009, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[5]  A. Altunkaynak Forecasting Surface Water Level Fluctuations of Lake Van by Artificial Neural Networks , 2007 .

[6]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators , 1989, Neural Networks.

[7]  null null,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. II: Hydrologic Applications , 2000 .

[8]  Chung-Yen Kuo,et al.  Caspian Sea level prediction using satellite altimetry by artificial neural networks , 2013, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[9]  Donna M. Rizzo,et al.  Advances in ungauged streamflow prediction using artificial neural networks , 2010 .

[10]  K. Budu,et al.  Comparison of Wavelet-Based ANN and Regression Models for Reservoir Inflow Forecasting , 2014 .

[11]  A. Tahershamsi,et al.  An evaluation model of artificial neural network to predict stable width in gravel bed rivers , 2012, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[12]  S. M. Bateni,et al.  Neural network and neuro-fuzzy assessments for scour depth around bridge piers , 2007, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[13]  Yen-Ming Chiang,et al.  Multi-step-ahead neural networks for flood forecasting , 2007 .

[14]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  FEED FORWARD NETWORKS ARE UNIVERSAL APPROXIMATORS , 1989 .

[15]  Vahid Nourani,et al.  Using self-organizing maps and wavelet transforms for space–time pre-processing of satellite precipitation and runoff data in neural network based rainfall–runoff modeling , 2013 .

[16]  F. Feng,et al.  Reply to "Comment on , 1977 .

[17]  P. B. Deolalikar,et al.  Neural Networks for Estimation of Scour Downstream of a Ski-Jump Bucket , 2005 .

[18]  Linda See,et al.  Data preprocessing for river flow forecasting using neural networks: Wavelet transforms and data partitioning , 2006 .

[19]  Hafzullah Aksoy,et al.  Modeling Monthly Mean Flow in a Poorly Gauged Basin by Fuzzy Logic , 2009 .

[20]  Surajit Chattopadhyay,et al.  Single hidden layer artificial neural network models versus multiple linear regression model in forecasting the time series of total ozone , 2007 .

[21]  Hirad Abghari,et al.  Prediction of monthly discharge volume by different artificial neural network algorithms in semi-arid regions , 2013, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[22]  Joaquín Andreu,et al.  Multivariate synthetic streamflow generation using a hybrid model based on artificial neural networks , 2002 .

[23]  Vahid Nourani Reply to comment on ‘Nourani V, Mogaddam AA, Nadiri AO. 2008. An ANN-based model for spatiotemporal groundwater level forecasting. Hydrological Processes 22: 5054–5066’ , 2009 .

[24]  Vahid Nourani,et al.  Liquid Analog Model for Laboratory Simulation of Rainfall–Runoff Process , 2007 .

[25]  Ali Danandeh Mehr,et al.  Streamflow prediction using linear genetic programming in comparison with a neuro-wavelet technique , 2013 .

[26]  Yan Li,et al.  Comparison of Several Flood Forecasting Models in Yangtze River , 2005 .

[27]  Donald F. Specht,et al.  A general regression neural network , 1991, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[28]  Hamed Kashi,et al.  Prediction of water quality parameters of Karoon River (Iran) by artificial intelligence-based models , 2014, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[29]  Sobri Harun,et al.  Particle swarm optimization feedforward neural network for modeling runoff , 2010 .

[30]  O. Kisi Wavelet regression model for short-term streamflow forecasting. , 2010 .

[31]  T. Rientjes,et al.  Constraints of artificial neural networks for rainfall-runoff modelling: trade-offs in hydrological state representation and model evaluation , 2005 .

[32]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  Comparison of different ANN techniques in river flow prediction , 2007 .

[33]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  Stream flow forecasting using neuro‐wavelet technique , 2008 .

[34]  P. Coulibaly,et al.  Two decades of anarchy? Emerging themes and outstanding challenges for neural network river forecasting , 2012 .

[35]  R. Abrahart,et al.  Comparing neural network and autoregressive moving average techniques for the provision of continuous river flow forecasts in two contrasting catchments , 2000 .

[36]  Alfred Stein,et al.  Assessment of a conceptual hydrological model and artificial neural networks for daily outflows forecasting , 2013, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.