If you want a quick kiss, make it count: How choice of syntactic construction affects event construal

When we hear an event description, our mental construal is not only based on lexical items, but also on the message’s syntactic structure. This has been well-studied in the domains of causation, event participants, and object conceptualization. Less studied are the construals of temporality and numerosity as a function of syntax. We present a theory of how syntax affects the construal of event similarity and duration in a way that is systematically predictable from the interaction of mass/count syntax and verb semantics, and test these predictions in six studies. Punctive events in count syntax (give a kiss) and durative events in mass syntax (give advice) are construed as taking less time than in transitive frame (kiss and advise). Durative verbs in count syntax (give a talk), however, result in a semantic shift, orthogonal to duration estimates. These results demonstrate how syntactic and semantic structure together systematically affect event construal.

[1]  Jesse Snedeker,et al.  It takes two to kiss, but does it take three to give a kiss? Categorization based on thematic roles , 2014 .

[2]  Ken Hale,et al.  On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations , 1993 .

[3]  Caitlin M. Fausey,et al.  Subtle linguistic cues influence perceived blame and financial liability , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  Intuitive Prediction: Biases and Corrective Procedures , 1982 .

[5]  David Barner,et al.  No nouns, no verbs: psycholinguistic arguments in favor of lexical underspecification , 2002 .

[6]  David R. Dowty.  Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .

[7]  R. Levy.  Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.

[8]  R. Levy,et al.  The Chicken or the Egg? A Probabilistic Analysis of English Binomials , 2006, Language.

[9]  Martin Paczynski,et al.  The difference between "giving a rose" and "giving a kiss": Sustained neural activity to the light verb construction. , 2014, Journal of memory and language.

[10]  David Barner,et al.  Children's Early Understanding of Mass-Count Syntax: Individuation, Lexical Content, and the Number Asymmetry Hypothesis , 2006 .

[11]  Wolfgang Klein,et al.  Time in language , 1994 .

[12]  O. Jespersen.  A modern English grammar on historical principles , 1928 .

[13]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Thematic Relations as Links between Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution , 1992 .

[14]  Emmon Bach,et al.  The algebra of events , 1986, The Language of Time - A Reader.

[15]  Susan J. Hespos,et al.  Divisions of the physical world: Concepts of objects and substances. , 2015, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  R. Christensen.  Regression Models for Ordinal Data Introducing R-package ordinal , 2011 .

[17]  Todd M. Gureckis,et al.  CUNY Academic , 2016 .

[18]  R. Jackendoff.  Parts and boundaries , 1991, Cognition.

[19]  Maria Mercedes Piñango,et al.  Processing light verb constructions , 2011 .

[20]  Anne H. Anderson,et al.  The Accessibility of Pronominal Antecedents as a Function of Episode Shifts in Narrative Text , 1983 .

[21]  Claudia Brugman.  Light verbs and polysemy , 2001 .

[22]  R. Block,et al.  An Attentional · Gate Model of Prospective Time Estimation , 2022 .

[23]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[24]  Shigeru Miyagawa.  Light verbs and the ergative hypothesis , 1989 .

[25]  Daniel B. Wright,et al.  Do Differences in Event Descriptions Cause Differences in Duration Estimates , 2002 .

[26]  Roger Levy,et al.  Using R formulae to test for main effects in the presence of higher-order interactions , 2014, 1405.2094.

[27]  Andrea E. Martin,et al.  Language Processing as Cue Integration: Grounding the Psychology of Language in Perception and Neurophysiology , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[28]  Simon Grondin,et al.  When to start explicit counting in a time-intervals discrimination task: A critical point in the timing process of humans. , 1999 .

[29]  K Bock,et al.  That’s the way the cookie bounces: Syntactic and semantic components of experimentally elicited idiom blendsß , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[30]  Z. Harris,et al.  Foundations of Language , 1940 .

[31]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  The object: Substance:: Event: Process analogy , 2018 .

[32]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Predicting the dative alternation , 2007 .

[33]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  Word and Object , 1960 .

[34]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[35]  Z. Harris,et al.  Foundations of language , 1941 .

[36]  A. Goldberg,et al.  Evidence for automatic accessing of constructional meaning: Jabberwocky sentences prime associated verbs , 2013 .

[37]  Gero Bauer,et al.  The English ‘Perfect’ reconsidered , 1970, Journal of Linguistics.

[38]  Elsi Kaiser,et al.  The number of times a motion repeats influences sentence processing , 2015, CogSci.

[39]  Alec Marantz,et al.  Some key features of distributed morphology , 1994 .

[40]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[41]  Adele E. Goldberg.  Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  P. Tse,et al.  Attention and the subjective expansion of time , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  David Barner,et al.  The Interpretation of Functional Heads: Using Comparatives to Explore the Mass/Count Distinction , 2009, J. Semant..

[44]  Mahesh Srinivasan,et al.  How concepts and conventions structure the lexicon: Cross-linguistic evidence from polysemy , 2014 .

[45]  Roger Levy,et al.  Memory and surprisal in human sentence comprehension , 2013 .

[46]  Miriam Butt.  The Light Verb Jungle , 2003 .

[47]  Heike Wiese,et al.  "Ich mach dich Messer" : grammatische Produktivität in Kiez-Sprache ("Kanak Sprak") , 2006 .

[48]  Joan Maling,et al.  Beers, Kaffi, and Schnaps: Different Grammatical Options for Restaurant Talk Coercions in Three Germanic Languages , 2005, Journal of Germanic Linguistics.

[49]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  A Parallel Architecture perspective on language processing , 2007, Brain Research.

[50]  Sabine Schulte im Walde,et al.  Distinct processing of function verb categories in the human brain , 2009, Brain Research.

[51]  Edward Holsinger,et al.  Representing Idioms: Syntactic and Contextual Effects on Idiom Processing , 2013, Language and speech.

[52]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases , 2006 .

[53]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Verb Aspect and Situation Models , 2000 .

[54]  H. Harley.  How Do Verbs Get Their Names? Denominal verbs, Manner Incorporation, and the Ontology of Verb Roots in English , 2010 .

[55]  P. McCullagh.  Regression Models for Ordinal Data , 1980 .

[56]  Michelle A. Hollander,et al.  Affectedness and direct objects: The role of lexical semantics in the acquisition of verb argument structure , 1991, Cognition.

[57]  P. Gordon.  Evaluating the semantic categories hypothesis: The case of the count/mass distinction , 1985, Cognition.

[58]  Zeno Vendler,et al.  Verbs and Times , 1957, The Language of Time - A Reader.

[59]  Martin Paczynski,et al.  When Events Change Their Nature: The Neurocognitive Mechanisms Underlying Aspectual Coercion , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  Howard B. Garey,et al.  Verbal Aspect in French , 1957 .

[61]  D. Titone,et al.  Time-dependent effects of decomposability, familiarity and literal plausibility on idiom priming: A cross-modal priming investigation , 2014 .

[62]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  How does verb aspect constrain event representations? , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[63]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Event structure in perception and conception. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[64]  C. Mckenzie,et al.  Underestimating the duration of future events: memory incorrectly used or memory bias? , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[65]  C. Burt,et al.  Effects of implied action speed on estimation of event duration , 1996 .

[66]  Henk J. Verkuyl,et al.  On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects , 1972 .

[67]  E. H. Hutten,et al.  SEMANTICS , 1953, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[68]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Understanding events : from perception to action , 2008 .

[69]  F. Macar,et al.  Controlled attention sharing influences time estimation , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[70]  Maria Mercedes Piñango,et al.  Semantic Combinatorial Processes in Argument Structure: Evidence from Light-Verbs , 2006 .

[71]  P. Tabossi,et al.  Idiom syntax: Idiosyncratic or principled? , 2009 .

[72]  Magne Jørgensen,et al.  To read two pages, I need 5 minutes, but give me 5 minutes and I will read four: how to change productivity estimates by inverting the question , 2011 .

[73]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  The Impact of Continuity Editing in Narrative Film on Event Segmentation , 2011, Cogn. Sci..

[74]  M G Boltz.  Effects of event structure on retrospective duration judgments , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[75]  D. Allerton.  Stretched Verb Constructions in English , 2001 .

[76]  A. Goldberg.  Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure , 1995 .

[77]  John Newman,et al.  Give : a cognitive linguistic study , 1996 .

[78]  Silvia P. Gennari,et al.  Time in language: Event duration in language comprehension , 2011, Cognitive Psychology.

[79]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Light verbs and 'th'-marking , 1988 .

[80]  Justin Kruger,et al.  If you don't want to be late, enumerate: Unpacking reduces the planning fallacy , 2004 .

[81]  Elizabeth F. Loftus,et al.  Time went by so slowly: Overestimation of event duration by males and females , 1987 .

[82]  Miriam Butt.  The light verb jungle : still hacking away , 2010 .

[83]  David Barner,et al.  Events and the ontology of individuals: Verbs as a source of individuating mass and count nouns , 2008, Cognition.