Uncovering the Values and Constraints of Real-time Ridesharing for Low-resource Populations

Real-time ridesharing services (e.g., Uber and Lyft) are often touted as sharing-economy leaders and dramatically lower the cost of transportation. However, how to make these services work better among low-income and transportation-scarce households, how these individuals experience these services, and whether they encounter barriers in enlisting these services is unknown. To address these questions, we onboarded 13 low-income individuals living in transportation-scarce environments to Uber as passengers. Our participants found these services to be reliable and benefited from rich social interactions with drivers; however, barriers such as cost, limited payment methods, and low digital literacy can make such services infeasible. We contribute platform designs that could lead to increased digital literacy and application transparency. To be more inclusive and to reach critical mass, we suggest that these companies foster belief in commons and community trust by coordinating with local businesses in low-resource areas with lower digital literacy.

[1]  John S Preisser,et al.  Access to transportation and health care utilization in a rural region. , 2005, The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association.

[2]  Rosanna Smart,et al.  Faster and Cheaper: How Ride-Sourcing Fills a Gap in Low-Income Los Angeles Neighborhoods , 2015 .

[3]  Jacki O'Neill,et al.  Does the Sharing Economy do any Good? , 2016, CSCW '16 Companion.

[4]  Airi Lampinen,et al.  Challenges to Participation in the Sharing Economy: The Case of Local Online Peer-to-Peer Exchange in a Single Parents' Network , 2015, IxD&A.

[5]  Raj Chetty,et al.  Where is the Land of Opportunity? The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States* , 2014 .

[6]  Barry A. T. Brown,et al.  Designing for Labour: Uber and the On-Demand Mobile Workforce , 2016, CHI.

[7]  Michael J. Smart,et al.  A Longitudinal Analysis of Cars, Transit, and Employment Outcomes , 2015 .

[8]  A. Sundararajan The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism , 2016 .

[9]  John Urry,et al.  Social networks, mobile lives and social inequalities , 2012 .

[10]  Jens Riegelsberger,et al.  The mechanics of trust: A framework for research and design , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  Iis P. Tussyadiah,et al.  Drivers and barriers of peer-to-peer accommodation stay – an exploratory study with American and Finnish travellers , 2018 .

[12]  R. Cervero,et al.  Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco , 2016 .

[13]  Laura A. Dabbish,et al.  Working with Machines: The Impact of Algorithmic and Data-Driven Management on Human Workers , 2015, CHI.

[14]  Rachel Botsman,et al.  What's Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption , 2010 .

[15]  G. Koeske,et al.  Examining Transportation and Employment Outcomes: Evidence for Moving Beyond The Bus Pass , 2006 .

[16]  Michael Luca,et al.  Digital Discrimination: The Case of Airbnb.com , 2014 .

[17]  Kentaro Toyama,et al.  Intermediated technology use in developing communities , 2010, CHI.

[18]  P. V. D. Glind,et al.  The consumer potential of Collaborative Consumption: Identifying the motives of Dutch Collaborative Consumers & Measuring the consumer potential of Collaborative Consumption within the municipality of Amsterdam , 2013 .

[19]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[20]  Airi Lampinen,et al.  Studying the "Sharing Economy": Perspectives to Peer-to-Peer Exchange , 2015, CSCW Companion.

[21]  M. O’Reilly,et al.  ‘Unsatisfactory Saturation’: a critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research , 2013 .

[22]  John M. Carroll,et al.  A Muddle of Models of Motivation for Using Peer-to-Peer Economy Systems , 2015, CHI.

[23]  J. Burke,et al.  Disparities and access to healthy food in the United States: A review of food deserts literature. , 2010, Health & place.

[24]  Raj Chetty,et al.  The Effects of Exposure to Better Neighborhoods on Children: New Evidence from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment , 2015, The American economic review.

[25]  J. Urry,et al.  Social Exclusion, Mobility and Access 1 , 2005 .

[26]  Loren G. Terveen,et al.  Avoiding the South Side and the Suburbs: The Geography of Mobile Crowdsourcing Markets , 2015, CSCW.

[27]  Christopher R. Knittel,et al.  Racial and Gender Discrimination in Transportation Network Companies , 2016 .

[28]  Jacki O'Neill,et al.  Peer-to-peer in the Workplace: A View from the Road , 2016, CHI.

[29]  Tawanna Dillahunt,et al.  The Promise of the Sharing Economy among Disadvantaged Communities , 2015, CHI.

[30]  M. Mobius,et al.  Trust and Social Collateral , 2007 .

[31]  J. Lemkau,et al.  Barriers to healthcare access in a non-elderly urban poor American population. , 2001, Health & social care in the community.

[32]  Alex Rosenblat,et al.  Algorithmic Labor and Information Asymmetries: A Case Study of Uber’s Drivers , 2016 .

[33]  Giana M. Eckhardt,et al.  Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing , 2012 .

[34]  Esther Keymolen,et al.  Trust and technology in collaborative consumption: Why it is not just about you and me , 2013 .

[35]  Kentaro Toyama,et al.  Geek Heresy: Rescuing Social Change from the Cult of Technology , 2015 .

[36]  R. Flowerdew,et al.  Tell me about . . . : using interviews as a research methodology , 2013 .

[37]  Airi Lampinen,et al.  Defining the price of hospitality: networked hospitality exchange via Airbnb , 2014, CSCW Companion '14.