Intersession repeatability of macular thickness measurements with the Humphrey 2000 OCT.

PURPOSE This study was designed to determine intersession repeatability of measurements of macular thickness made with a commercially available optical coherence tomography (OCT) system. The images that can be routinely acquired with the commercial instrument differ significantly in quality from the images in the literature, which have mostly been acquired on prototype systems. METHODS Multiple OCT images of the nasal macula were obtained from the right eye during three independent measuring sessions, using the Humphrey 2000 OCT system (Humphrey, San Leandro, CA). Twenty-six volunteers with no history of ocular disease participated in this investigation. Eyes in all subjects were undilated during scan acquisition. Scans were horizontal, 3 mm long, and through the fovea. Five scans were used from each session, for a total of 15 scans per subject. Retinal boundaries were automatically detected using custom software. Statistical software was used to calculate intersession and intrasession repeatability. Manual correction was performed on the automatically detected boundaries, and a second analysis was performed using these boundaries. RESULTS When no manual correction of boundaries was performed, there were no significant effects between different sessions (P = 0.529) or between different scans within the same session (P = 0.509). Average retinal thickness was found to be 274 +/- 17 microm for a 1-mm long region 0.75 mm from the fovea. Individual scan averages differed from overall patient averages by 0 +/- 4.3 microm (99% confidence interval, 11.2 microm). CONCLUSIONS OCT measurements of macular thickness made with the Humphrey 2000 OCT system are repeatable over different sessions with an expected variation of less than 11 microm (99% confidence interval).

[1]  E Reichel,et al.  Characterization of epiretinal membranes using optical coherence tomography. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[2]  C.P. Lin,et al.  Optical coherence tomography for ophthalmic imaging: new technique delivers micron-scale resolution , 1995, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[3]  C. Zetterström,et al.  Exfoliation syndrome and the effect of phenylephrine and pilocarpine on pupil size , 1993, Acta ophthalmologica.

[4]  Eric A. Swanson,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Macular Edema With Optical Coherence Tomography , 1995 .

[5]  Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 1. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study research group. , 1985, Archives of ophthalmology.

[6]  J. Duker,et al.  Optical coherence tomography of age-related macular degeneration and choroidal neovascularization. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[7]  E Reichel,et al.  Topography of diabetic macular edema with optical coherence tomography. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[8]  PHOTOCOAGULATION FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: EARLY TREATMENT DIABETIC RETINOPATHY STUDY REPORT NO. 4 , 1987, International ophthalmology clinics.

[9]  E Reichel,et al.  Optical coherence tomography of central serous chorioretinopathy. , 1995, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical coherence tomography of the human retina. , 1995, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  R Ritch,et al.  Reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements in normal eyes using optical coherence tomography. , 1998, Ophthalmic surgery and lasers.

[12]  J. Duker,et al.  Optical coherence tomography of macular lesions associated with optic nerve head pits. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[13]  James G. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical Coherence Tomography of Ocular Diseases , 1995 .

[14]  J. Schuman,et al.  Optical coherence tomography. , 2000, Science.