Evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game among mobile players with random-pairing and reinforcement learning

The evolutionary spatial game in a mobile population has attracted many researchers of biological, social and economic sciences. Considering some facts observed in the real world, this paper proposes a novel spatial evolutionary snowdrift game model with movable players. In this model, one player interacts only with the nearest neighbor in each turn, and makes decision in a reinforcement learning way. In a very large range of the parameters moving ability enhances cooperation, but under some special condition, velocity heavily depresses cooperation. Some explanations have also been given out by investigating the strategy-change behavior of players. The findings may be helpful in understanding cooperative behavior in natural and social systems consisting of mobile agents.

[1]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , 1992, Nature.

[2]  L. Keller,et al.  Human cooperation in social dilemmas: comparing the Snowdrift game with the Prisoner's Dilemma , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Shiquan Zhong,et al.  Iterated snowdrift game among mobile agents with myopic expected-reward based decision rule: Numerical and analytical research , 2014 .

[4]  Shao-Meng Qin,et al.  Effect of memory on the prisoner's dilemma game in a square lattice. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  Zhuo Chen,et al.  Evolution of cooperation among mobile agents , 2010, 1006.0772.

[6]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Logic of Animal Conflict , 1973, Nature.

[7]  G. Szabo,et al.  Diversity of reproduction rate supports cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game on complex networks , 2008, 0802.2807.

[8]  Joaquim Fort,et al.  Effects of punishment in a mobile population playing the prisoner's dilemma game. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  P. Kollock SOCIAL DILEMMAS: The Anatomy of Cooperation , 1998 .

[10]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Dynamics of N-person snowdrift games in structured populations. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  Xiaofan Wang,et al.  Cooperative dynamics of snowdrift game on spatial distance-dependent small-world networks , 2006 .

[12]  M. Tomassini,et al.  Hawks and Doves on small-world networks. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  P. H. T. Schimit,et al.  The evolution of cooperation with different fitness functions using probabilistic cellular automata , 2015, Comput. Manag. Sci..

[14]  Chen Xu,et al.  Networking effects on evolutionary snowdrift game in networks with fixed degrees , 2007 .

[15]  Michael Doebeli,et al.  Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game , 2004, Nature.

[16]  Anabela Botelho,et al.  Testing static game theory with dynamic experiments: A case study of public goods , 2009, Games Econ. Behav..

[17]  J. J. Arenzon,et al.  Random mobility and spatial structure often enhance cooperation. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Evolution of cooperation under N-person snowdrift games. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  John Duffy,et al.  Cooperative behavior and the frequency of social interaction , 2009, Games Econ. Behav..

[20]  A. van Oudenaarden,et al.  Snowdrift game dynamics and facultative cheating in yeast , 2009, Nature.

[21]  K. Kaski,et al.  Spatial snowdrift game with myopic agents , 2005 .

[22]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Evolution of cooperation among mobile agents with heterogenous view radii , 2011 .

[23]  Chen Xu,et al.  Networking effects on cooperation in evolutionary snowdrift game , 2006 .

[24]  Y Moreno,et al.  Effects of mobility in a population of prisoner's dilemma players. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[25]  Scott L. Hershberger,et al.  Cooperation and Competition Between Twins: Findings from a Prisoner’s Dilemma Game , 1999 .