The Representation of Polysemous Words

Words that have a number of related senses are polysemous. For example, paper refers to both a substance and a publication printed on that substance. Five experiments investigated whether different senses are represented distinctly in the lexicon or if there is a common, core meaning. In all experiments, a polysemous word was used twice, in phrases that selected the same or different senses. Experiment 1 showed that sense consistency aided memory for the polysemous word. Experiment 2 extended this result to a timed sensicality judgment task. Experiment 3 demonstrated that the effects for polysemous words were very similar to those for homonyms. Experiment 4 ruled out the possibility of modifier‐modifier priming. Experiment 5 showed that sense consistency facilitates comprehension relative to a neutral baseline, while sense inconsistency inhibits comprehension. These experiments provide evidence that polysemous words have separate representations for each sense and that any core meaning is minimal. © 2001 Academic Press

[1]  Semantic Constraint on the Decoding of Ambiguous Words. , 1970 .

[2]  L. Light,et al.  Effects of Changed Semantic Context on Recognition Memory , 1970 .

[3]  L. Zgusta.  Manual of Lexicography , 1971 .

[4]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  On putting apples into bottles — A problem of polysemy , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  D. Swinney,et al.  Effects of prior context upon lexical access during sentence comprehension. , 1976 .

[6]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  When Nouns Surface as Verbs , 1979 .

[7]  G. Nunberg.  The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: Polysemy , 1979 .

[8]  R. Langacker.  Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[9]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .

[10]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Understanding old words with new meanings , 1983 .

[11]  R. Burchfield.  Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .

[12]  Gilles Fauconnier,et al.  Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language , 1985 .

[13]  K. Heyer,et al.  On the nature of neutral primes in a lexical decision task , 1986 .

[14]  Richard J. Gerrig,et al.  Process and products of lexical access , 1986 .

[15]  J. Hampton.  Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[16]  M. Kutas,et al.  Ambiguous words in context: An event-related potential analysis of the time course of meaning activation ☆ ☆☆ , 1987 .

[17]  George Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things , 1987 .

[18]  P. Tabossi.  Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential contexts , 1988 .

[19]  K. Durkin,et al.  Polysemy and the subjective lexicon: Semantic relatedness and the salience of intraword senses , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[20]  Charles Ruhl.  On Monosemy: A Study in Linguistic Semantics , 1989 .

[21]  R. Gerrig,et al.  The time course of sense creation , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[22]  A. Lehrer.  Polysemy, conventionality, and the structure of the lexicon , 1990 .

[23]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Language Comprehension As Structure Building , 1990 .

[24]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  The role of suppression in sentence comprehension , 1991 .

[25]  Eve Sweetser,et al.  From Etymology to Pragmatics: Preface , 1990 .

[26]  Gregory B. Simpson,et al.  Understanding word and sentence , 1991 .

[27]  Richard J. Gerrig,et al.  Contextual influences on the comprehension of complex concepts , 1992 .

[28]  Stanley A. Rice,et al.  Polysemy and lexical representation: The case of three English prepositions , 1992 .

[29]  N. Chater,et al.  Proceedings of the fourteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society , 1992 .

[30]  John N. Williams.  Processing polysemous words in context: Evidence for interrelated meanings , 1992 .

[31]  B. Abbott,et al.  The Psychology of Word Meanings. , 1992 .

[32]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[33]  A. H. Kawamoto.  Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: A parallel distributed processing account. , 1993 .

[34]  S. Lewandowsky,et al.  Context effects in repetition priming are sense effects , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Patrizia Tabossi,et al.  Processing Ambiguous Words in Context , 1993 .

[36]  D. Geeraerts.  Vagueness's puzzles, polysemy's vagaries , 1993 .

[37]  David Tuggy.  Ambiguity, polysemy, and vagueness , 1993 .

[38]  Michael Harrington,et al.  Taking a Stand on the Meanings of Stand: Bodily Experience as Motivation for Polysemy , 1994, J. Semant..

[39]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  Effects of Polysemy in Lexical Decision and Naming: An Alternative to Lexical Access Accounts , 1996 .

[40]  G. Murphy.  Polysemy and the creation of new word meanings , 1997 .

[41]  Silvia P. Gennari,et al.  Knowing versus Naming: Similarity and the Linguistic Categorization of Artifacts , 1999 .

[42]  S. Schiffer.  Meanings and Concepts , 1999 .

[43]  Devorah Emily Klein.  "Paper Has Been My Ruin": On the Organization of Polysemous Senses , 2000 .

[44]  Jyotsna Vaid,et al.  Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes , 2001 .