A method for identifying sources of model uncertainty in rainfall-runoff simulations

Summary A major goal in environmental modeling is identifying and quantifying sources of uncertainty in the modeling process. A forecast ensemble is developed in this study for a rainfall-runoff simulation system. This ensemble includes several quantitative precipitation estimates that serve as inputs to the Vflo ™ hydrologic model. The rainfall estimates are derived from rain gauges, radar, satellite, and combinations, and their probability distribution is assumed to encompass the true, but unknown, rainfall. Sensitive model parameters in the model are also perturbed within their physical bounds to create a combined input-parameter ensemble. If all major sources of uncertainty are accounted for, then observations of river discharge should fall within simulation bounds. Otherwise, there may be additional errors that lie within the model structure. Probability distributions derived from the forecast ensemble encompass streamflow observations for three hydrologic events examined during October and December on the Blue River Basin in Oklahoma. It is discovered, however, that all simulations from an ensemble created for a warm season case overforecast discharge peaks and volumes. Climatological rain gauge, discharge, and soil moisture observations are introduced to illuminate the source of uncertainty that was not accounted for in the combined input-parameter ensemble. Observations show a strong correlation between dry, deep-layer soils and significantly reduced runoff production (provided the same rainfall inputs) during the summer months. The Green and Ampt methodology is used in the model to compute soil infiltration rates. Evidence suggests additional abstractions such as interception and evapotranspiration by vegetation and deep cracks in the soil structure contribute to enhanced infiltration rates during the warm season. These effects need to be considered for future infiltration models.

[1]  Eugenia Kalnay,et al.  Ensemble Forecasting at NMC: The Generation of Perturbations , 1993 .

[2]  B. Silverman Density estimation for statistics and data analysis , 1986 .

[3]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Calibration of rainfall‐runoff models: Application of global optimization to the Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Model , 1993 .

[4]  D. Stensrud,et al.  Mesoscale Convective Systems in Weakly Forced Large-Scale Environments. Part III: Numerical Simulations and Implications for Operational Forecasting , 1994 .

[5]  Jun Du,et al.  Short-Range Ensemble Forecasting of Quantitative Precipitation , 1997 .

[6]  M. B. Beck,et al.  Water quality modeling: A review of the analysis of uncertainty , 1987 .

[7]  Eugenia Kalnay,et al.  Operational Ensemble Prediction at the National Meteorological Center: Practical Aspects , 1993 .

[8]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[9]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models , 1992 .

[10]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Toward improved streamflow forecasts: value of semidistributed modeling , 2001 .

[11]  Assessing error in hydrological and hydraulic model output flows , 2004 .

[12]  A. H. Murphy,et al.  On the Relationship between the Accuracy and Value of Forecasts in the Cost–Loss Ratio Situation , 1987 .

[13]  G. H. Leavesley,et al.  Precipitation-runoff modeling system; user's manual , 1983 .

[14]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Stochastic parameter estimation procedures for hydrologie rainfall‐runoff models: Correlated and heteroscedastic error cases , 1980 .

[15]  J. Gourley,et al.  An Exploratory Multisensor Technique for Quantitative Estimation of Stratiform Rainfall , 2002 .

[16]  Thomas M. Hamill,et al.  Verification of Eta–RSM Short-Range Ensemble Forecasts , 1997 .

[17]  M. Wigmosta,et al.  A distributed hydrology-vegetation model for complex terrain , 1994 .

[18]  E. Lorenz Deterministic nonperiodic flow , 1963 .

[19]  Jeffrey B. Basara,et al.  Linear relationships between root‐zone soil moisture and atmospheric processes in the planetary boundary layer , 2002 .

[20]  J. Gourley,et al.  A Method for Evaluating the Accuracy of Quantitative Precipitation Estimates from a Hydrologic Modeling Perspective , 2005 .

[21]  E. Lorenz The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion , 1969 .

[22]  Pierre Y. Julien,et al.  RASTER‐BASED HYDROLOGIC MODELING OF SPATIALLY‐VARIED SURFACE RUNOFF , 1995 .

[23]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  An introduction to the European Hydrological System — Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, “SHE”, 2: Structure of a physically-based, distributed modelling system , 1986 .

[24]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  An introduction to the European Hydrological System — Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, “SHE”, 1: History and philosophy of a physically-based, distributed modelling system , 1986 .

[25]  V. B. Sauer,et al.  Determination of error in individual discharge measurements , 1992 .

[26]  David J. Stensrud,et al.  Using Initial Condition and Model Physics Perturbations in Short-Range Ensemble Simulations of Mesoscale Convective Systems , 2000 .

[27]  M. Sharp,et al.  Influence of subglacial drainage system evolution on glacier surface motion: Haut Glacier d'Arolla, Switzerland , 2002 .

[28]  K. Beven,et al.  Bayesian Estimation of Uncertainty in Runoff Prediction and the Value of Data: An Application of the GLUE Approach , 1996 .

[29]  Roman Krzysztofowicz,et al.  Bayesian theory of probabilistic forecasting via deterministic hydrologic model , 1999 .

[30]  Pierre Y. Julien,et al.  Runoff model sensitivity to radar rainfall resolution , 1994 .

[31]  The HEC Hydrologic Modeling System. , 1995 .