Patterns in the Clouds - The Effects of Clustered Presentation on Tag Cloud Interaction

Tag clouds have become a frequently used interaction technique in web-based systems. Recently, different clustered presentation approaches have been suggested to improve usability and utility of tag clouds. In this paper we describe a modified layout strategy for clustered tag clouds and report the findings of an empirical evaluation of automatically clustered tag clouds with 22 participants for both specific and general search tasks. The evaluation showed that automatically clustered presentation performs as well as alphabetic layouts in specific search tasks and that clustered presentation is an improvement over random layout for general search tasks. Clustered tag cloud presentation also was preferred by a majority of users for general search tasks. High quality of the clustering was mentioned as key variable for usefulness of the approach in the qualitative interviews with the users.

[1]  George Karypis,et al.  CLUTO - A Clustering Toolkit , 2002 .

[2]  Michael Cardew-Hall,et al.  The folksonomy tag cloud: when is it useful? , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..

[3]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  FacetClouds: exploring tag clouds for multi-dimensional data , 2013, Graphics Interface.

[4]  Yusef Hassan-Montero,et al.  Improving Tag-Clouds as Visual Information Retrieval Interfaces , 2024, 2401.04947.

[5]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Tag Clouds: Data Analysis Tool or Social Signaller? , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[6]  Martin Halvey,et al.  An assessment of tag presentation techniques , 2007, WWW '07.

[7]  Benjamin M. Good,et al.  Tag clouds for summarizing web search results , 2007, WWW '07.

[8]  Marco Winckler,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2009, 12th IFIP TC 13 International Conference, Uppsala, Sweden, August 24-28, 2009, Proceedings, Part I , 2009, INTERACT.

[9]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Getting our head in the clouds: toward evaluation studies of tagclouds , 2007, CHI.

[10]  Jacek Gwizdka,et al.  Does interactive search results overview help?: an eye tracking study , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[11]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  SparkClouds: Visualizing Trends in Tag Clouds , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[12]  George Karypis,et al.  A Comparison of Document Clustering Techniques , 2000 .

[13]  Takeshi Yamada,et al.  Topigraphy: visualization for large-scale tag clouds , 2008, WWW.

[14]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Visual Search Strategies of Tag Clouds - Results from an Eyetracking Study , 2009, INTERACT.

[15]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Semantically structured tag clouds: an empirical evaluation of clustered presentation approaches , 2009, CHI.

[16]  Steffen Lohmann,et al.  Comparison of Tag Cloud Layouts: Task-Related Performance and Visual Exploration , 2009, INTERACT.

[17]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Seeing things in the clouds: the effect of visual features on tag cloud selections , 2008, Hypertext.

[18]  Owen Kaser,et al.  Tag-Cloud Drawing: Algorithms for Cloud Visualization , 2007, ArXiv.

[19]  Ivan Berlocher,et al.  TopicRank: bringing insight to users , 2008, SIGIR '08.