Scale effects on headwater catchment runoff timing, flow sources, and groundwater‐streamflow relations

sections (55–285 m 2 ) to a 280-ha catchment at Maimai on the west coast of the South Island, New Zealand. The highly organized landscape is comprised of similar headwater catchments, regular geology, steep highly dissected topography, relatively consistent soil depths, and topographically controlled shallow through flow. We found a strong correlation between riparian zone groundwater levels and runoff for the headwaters, whereas the water tables in the valley bottom of the larger catchments were uncorrelated to runoff for 14 months of record. While there was no clear relationship between catchment size and new water contribution to runoff in the two storms analyzed in detail, lag times of tracer responses increased systematically with catchment size. The combination of hydrometric and tracer data allowed assessment of the runoff contributions from different parts of the landscape. Runoff was generated consistently in headwater riparian zones. This agreed also with the observed variations of tracer ( 18 O and silica) responses for the different catchments. During wetter antecedent conditions or during larger events (>30 mm under dry antecedent conditions) hillslope and valley bottom floodplains did contribute to event runoff directly. We propose that analysis of landscape-scale organization and the distribution of dominant landscape features provide a structure for investigation of runoff production and solute transport, especially as catchment-scale increases from headwaters to the mesoscale. INDEX TERMS: 1719 History of Geophysics: Hydrology; 1860 Hydrology: Runoff and streamflow; 1871 Hydrology: Surface water quality; 1866 Hydrology: Soil moisture; KEYWORDS: scale, water age, runoff generation, landscape organization

[1]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Role of discrete landscape units in controlling catchment dissolved organic carbon dynamics , 2003 .

[2]  A. Pearce,et al.  Storm runoff generation in humid headwater catchments 1 , 1986 .

[3]  M. Bonell,et al.  SELECTED CHALLENGES IN RUNOFF GENERATION RESEARCH IN FORESTS FROM THE HILLSLOPE TO HEADWATER DRAINAGE BASIN SCALE 1 , 1998 .

[4]  Brian L. McGlynn,et al.  Distributed assessment of contributing area and riparian buffering along stream networks , 2003 .

[5]  Brian L. McGlynn,et al.  A review of the evolving perceptual model of hillslope flowpaths at the Maimai catchments, New Zealand , 2002 .

[6]  Oscar J. Mesa,et al.  On the Relative Role of Hillslope and Network Geometry in Hydrologic Response , 1986 .

[7]  M. Sivapalan,et al.  On the relative roles of hillslope processes, channel routing, and network geomorphology in the hydrologic response of natural catchments , 1995 .

[8]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  The role of event water, a rapid shallow flow component, and catchment size in summer stormflow , 1999 .

[9]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Where does water go when it rains? Moving beyond the variable source area concept of rainfall‐runoff response , 2003 .

[10]  M. Kirkby.  Tests of the random network model, and its application to basin hydrology , 1976 .

[11]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Scaling in hydrology , 2001 .

[12]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Quantifying the relative contributions of riparian and hillslope zones to catchment runoff , 2003 .

[13]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  On the dialog between experimentalist and modeler in catchment hydrology: Use of soft data for multicriteria model calibration , 2002 .

[14]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  On the relationships between catchment scale and streamwater mean residence time , 2003 .

[15]  A combined tracer-hydrometric approach to assess the effect of catchment scale on water flow path, source and age , 1999 .

[16]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Riparian zone flowpath dynamics during snowmelt in a small headwater catchment , 1999 .

[17]  R. Woods,et al.  A connection between topographically driven runoff generation and channel network structure , 1997 .

[18]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Deuterium variations in storm rainfall: Implications for stream hydrograph separation , 1990 .

[19]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  The age, origin and pathway of subsurface stormflow in a steep humid headwater catchment. , 1988 .

[20]  F. Swanson,et al.  Hydrologic inferences from comparisons among small basin experiments , 2001 .

[21]  D. Burns.  Stormflow‐hydrograph separation based on isotopes: the thrill is gone — what's next? , 2002 .

[22]  J. McDonnell,et al.  On the future of forest hydrology and biogeochemistry , 2001 .

[23]  Keith Beven,et al.  Effects of spatial variability and scale with implications to hydrologic modeling , 1988 .

[24]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Controls on old and new water contributions to stream flow at some nested catchments in Vermont, USA , 2002 .

[25]  Keith Beven,et al.  The role of bedrock topography on subsurface storm flow , 2002 .

[26]  Kevin Bishop,et al.  Groundwater dynamics along a hillslope: A test of the steady state hypothesis , 2003 .

[27]  S. Uhlenbrook,et al.  Hydrograph separations in a mesoscale mountainous basin at event and seasonal timescales , 2002 .

[28]  A. J. Surkan,et al.  Synthetic Hydrographs: Effects of Network Geometry , 1969 .

[29]  M. Sivapalan,et al.  Scale problems in hydrology: Contributions of the robertson workshop , 1995 .

[30]  Ross Woods,et al.  The changing spatial variability of subsurface flow across a hillside , 1996 .

[31]  A. Pearce.  Streamflow Generation Processes: An Austral View , 1990 .

[32]  John F. Dowd,et al.  A new interpretation of kinematic stormflow generation , 2002 .

[33]  Ch. Leibundgut,et al.  Process‐oriented catchment modelling and multiple‐response validation , 2002 .