Estimating the temperature of a maize apex during early growth stages

Abstract When the leaf area index is low at the early stages of growth, the temperature of a maize apex can be much higher than the air temperature measured at screen level. In order to account for temperature effects in plant growth simulation models, it would be better to use plant temperature rather than air temperature. We propose a model to estimate the apex temperature for both day-time and night-time averages from a small number of readily available meteorological data: solar radiation, wind speed, air temperature and humidity. It is based on an energy balance of a maize apex under field conditions. It performs a radiation balance that separates diffuse and direct components, and assumes a similarity between the apex and soil surface temperature evolutions. In the absence of any references, the apex stomatal resistance was parameterized as a simple linear function of water vapour deficit, deduced from experimental data. The calculated temperatures were compared with those measured for two sets of experimental data collected in 1989 and 1990. The agreement was quite satisfactory, the average absolute error being in all cases less than 1.0°C. Furthermore, the empirical relationship between stomatal resistance and water vapour deficit was shown to be valid for both sets of data. We should now confirm this relation under different soil or climatic conditions, as well as the similarity between the apex and soil surface temperatures.

[1]  C. B. Tanner,et al.  Evaporation from a Drying Soil , 1967 .

[2]  G. Collatz,et al.  Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer , 1991 .

[3]  N. Katerji,et al.  Etude de quelques critères indicateurs de l'état hydrique d'une culture de tomate en région semi-aride , 1988 .

[4]  I. R. Cowan,et al.  Transfer processes in plant canopies in relation to stomatal characteristics. , 1987 .

[5]  E. K. Webb Profile relationships: The log‐linear range, and extension to strong stability , 1970 .

[6]  W. Brutsaert Evaporation into the atmosphere , 1982 .

[7]  Joe T. Ritchie,et al.  Temperature and Crop Development , 1991 .

[8]  Jen-Yu Wang,et al.  A Critique of the Heat Unit Approach to Plant Response Studies , 1960 .

[9]  G. Campbell,et al.  An equation for separating daily solar irradiation into direct and diffuse components , 1985 .

[10]  B. J. Garnier,et al.  A Method of Calculating the Direct Shortwave Radiation Income of Slopes , 1968 .

[11]  J. Monteith,et al.  Principles of Environmental Physics , 2014 .

[12]  C. Paulson The Mathematical Representation of Wind Speed and Temperature Profiles in the Unstable Atmospheric Surface Layer , 1970 .

[13]  J. Goudriaan,et al.  SEPARATING THE DIFFUSE AND DIRECT COMPONENT OF GLOBAL RADIATION AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR MODELING CANOPY PHOTOSYNTHESIS PART I. COMPONENTS OF INCOMING RADIATION , 1986 .

[14]  J. Davies,et al.  Reflection coefficients, heating coefficients and net radiation at Simcoe, southern Ontario , 1969 .

[15]  Benjamin Y. H. Liu,et al.  The interrelationship and characteristic distribution of direct, diffuse and total solar radiation , 1960 .

[16]  C. Samie,et al.  Cartographie automatique de l'énergie solaire en fonction du relief , 1981 .

[17]  N. Turner Measurement and influence of environmental and plant factors on stomatal conductance in the field , 1991 .

[18]  B. Hicks,et al.  Flux‐gradient relationships in the constant flux layer , 1970 .

[19]  K. Allwine,et al.  Extraterrestrial solar radiation on inclined surfaces , 1986 .

[20]  J. Ham,et al.  On the Measurement of Soil Surface Temperature , 1992 .