Pattern classification of deep brain local field potentials for brain computer interfaces

The trend of current brain computer interfaces (BCI) seek to establish bi-directional communication with the brain, for instance, recovering motor functions by externally controlling devices and directly stimulating the brain. This will greatly assist paralyzed individuals through bypassing the damaged brain region. The key process of this communication interface is to decode movements from neural signals and encode information into neural activity. The majority of decoding or pattern classification studies have focused on cortical areas for BCIs, but deep brain structures have also been involved in motor control. The subthalamic nucleus (STN) in the basal ganglia is involved in the preparation, execution and imagining of movements, and may be an alternative source for driving BCIs. This study therefore aimed to classify patterns of deep brain local field potentials (LFPs) related to execution of visually cued movements. LFPs were recorded bilaterally from the STN through deep brain stimulation electrodes implanted in patients with Parkinson's disease. The frequency dependent components of the LFPs were extracted using the wavelet packet transform. In each frequency component, signal features were extracted using an alternative approach called neural synchronization by analyzing Granger causality between the STN. Based on these extracted features, a new feature selection strategy, namely weighted sequential feature selection (WSFS) was developed to efficiently select the optimal feature subset. A support vector machine (SVM) classifier was implemented alongside this novel feature extraction and selection strategy, and evaluated using a cross-validation procedure. Using this optimised feature subset, average correct pattern classification accuracy of movement (left or right) reached 76.0±3.1%. The results obtained in this study are encouraging and suggest that the neural activity in the deep neural circuit (basal ganglia) can be used for controlling BCIs.

[1]  Peter Brown,et al.  Basal ganglia local field potential activity: Character and functional significance in the human , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  Rabab K Ward,et al.  A survey of signal processing algorithms in brain–computer interfaces based on electrical brain signals , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[3]  Tipu Z. Aziz,et al.  Time–frequency analysis of transient neuromuscular events: dynamic changes in activity of the subthalamic nucleus and forearm muscles related to the intermittent resting tremor , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  P. Brown,et al.  Online prediction of self-paced hand-movements from subthalamic activity using neural networks in Parkinson’s disease , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[5]  M. Kringelbach,et al.  Translational principles of deep brain stimulation , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  Ahmed H. Tewfik,et al.  High Accuracy Decoding of Movement Target Direction in Non-Human Primates Based on Common Spatial Patterns of Local Field Potentials , 2010, PloS one.

[7]  R. Andersen,et al.  Selecting the signals for a brain–machine interface , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  K. A. Mamun,et al.  A robust strategy for decoding movements from deep brain local field potentials to facilitate brain machine interfaces , 2012, 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[9]  Dennis A. Turner,et al.  The development of brain-machine interface neuroprosthetic devices , 2011, Neurotherapeutics.

[10]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Brain–machine interfaces: past, present and future , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  J. Stein,et al.  The sensory and motor representation of synchronized oscillations in the globus pallidus in patients with primary dystonia. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[13]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  A MATLAB toolbox for Granger causal connectivity analysis , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  J A Obeso,et al.  Movement‐related changes in oscillatory activity in the human subthalamic nucleus: ipsilateral vs. contralateral movements , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[15]  Tipu Z. Aziz,et al.  Revealing the dynamic causal interdependence between neural and muscular signals in Parkinsonian tremor , 2007, J. Frankl. Inst..

[16]  S. Bressler,et al.  Beta oscillations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: directional influences revealed by Granger causality. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Peter Brown,et al.  Modulation of beta oscillations in the subthalamic area during motor imagery in Parkinson's disease. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  Shigeo Abe DrEng Pattern Classification , 2001, Springer London.

[19]  Rodolphe Heliot,et al.  Brain–Machine Interfaces , 2010 .