Consumer Learning Embedded in Electronic Word of Mouth

ABSTRACTConsumers who lack personal experience with online products and virtual shops perceive a high level of risk in the ecommerce context. Consumers need to learn about online products and vendors before they make a purchase decision. Electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) is a medium for such learning that not only includes specific recommendations about online products and vendors, but also supports social interaction among past and potential future consumers on transaction platforms. Based upon consumer learning theories and the Elaboration Likelihood Model, this study proposes a framework for the analysis of how eWOM carries consumer learning and influences future consumers. Based on the proposed framework, a large set of consumer-generated reviews of online transactions was analyzed using content analysis methodology. After the categorization of review messages with learning cues by review valence, our study examined the impact of buyers' experience levels on the development of review content. The results showed that the experienced buyers tended to deliver more social cues and the novice buyers included more transactional cues in text reviews. In addition, the results indicate that consumer learning dimensions are not independent of review valence. Our study provides insights into theoretical and practical implications.Keywords: Consumer learning; Electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM); Review valence; Elaboration Likelihood Model; Content analysis1. IntroductionWith the advent of the Web 2.0 paradigm, Internet users have multiple tools such as customer review systems, online discussion forums, and social network sites to share their opinions and exchange information. This new form of word-of-mouth (WOM), electronic WOM (eWOM), is characterized as any positive or negative messages available to any Internet user that is originated by past or potential future consumers about a product, service or company [Hennig-Thurau et al., 2004]. When Internet users make purchase decisions, they tend to trust online reviews generated by consumers and regard them as more persuasive than traditional advertisement from marketers and companies, and reports from third party consumer reporting companies [Goldsmith and Horowitz, 2006]. Industry reports state that 61% of consumers consult online reviews before making a new purchase and that they are essential for ecommerce websites [Charlton, 2012]. Research studies have found that EWOMs have a significant impact on product sales [Godes and Mayzlin, 2004; Forman et al., 2008; Lu et al., 2014]. In addition to its impact on product sales, eWOMs have been examined in terms of message senders, message receivers, eWOM characteristics, and in terms of its antecedents and effects on purchase intention and sales [Hennig-Thurau et al., 2004; Liu, 2006; Park and Kim, 2008; Yap et al., 2013].One area which has received only limited research attention is eWOM as a source of consumer learning in the ecommerce context [Chen et al., 2011; Cheung et al., 2012]. Consumers and e-retailers are physically and temporally separated on an online transaction platform such as Amazon or EBay [Lee, 1998; Gutierrez et al., 2010]. Consumers perceive a high level of risk in online shopping because they cannot personally interact with a product to determine its characteristics before making a selection. In addition, the lean online communication medium eliminates many social cues, such as body language, that consumers can use to analyze online vendors' trustworthiness.The process by which individuals acquire the purchase and consumption knowledge and experience they apply to future behavior is termed consumer learning [Schiffman and Kanuk, 1983]. Several consumer learning theories, including observational learning, cognitive learning and social learning, are widely studied in the marketing literature, which has found that in a traditional shopping context, consumers learn through direct experience such as the personal experience of product trial and through indirect experience such as word-of-mouth and third party consumer reports [Smith and Swinyard, 1983]. …

[1]  Ho Geun Lee,et al.  Do electronic marketplaces lower the price of goods? , 1998, CACM.

[2]  David Schuff,et al.  What Makes a Helpful Review? A Study of Customer Reviews on Amazon.com , 2010 .

[3]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  Multiple Roles for Affect in Persuasion , 1991 .

[4]  P. Resnick,et al.  The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment , 2006 .

[5]  Magnus Söderlund,et al.  Receiving word-of-mouth from the service customer: An emotion-based effectiveness assessment , 2007 .

[6]  Dianne Cyr,et al.  The role of social presence in establishing loyalty in e-Service environments , 2007, Interact. Comput..

[7]  Judy A. Siguaw,et al.  Understanding the consumer propensity to observe , 2008 .

[8]  Anindya Ghose,et al.  Examining the Relationship Between Reviews and Sales: The Role of Reviewer Identity Disclosure in Electronic Markets , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Ingoo Han,et al.  The effect of negative online consumer reviews on product attitude: An information processing view , 2008, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[10]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Trust among strangers in internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay' s reputation system , 2002, The Economics of the Internet and E-commerce.

[11]  K. Pauwels,et al.  Effects of Word-of-Mouth versus Traditional Marketing: Findings from an Internet Social Networking Site , 2009 .

[12]  Ji Young Lee,et al.  Does source matter? Examining source effects in online product reviews , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  Cheol Park,et al.  Information direction, website reputation and eWOM effect: A moderating role of product type , 2009 .

[14]  A. Greenwald 6 – Cognitive Learning, Cognitive Response to Persuasion, and Attitude Change1 , 1968 .

[15]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[16]  C. Jayawardhena,et al.  e-Consumer Behaviour , 2009 .

[17]  Tim Mazzarol,et al.  Factors influencing word of mouth effectiveness: receiver perspectives , 2008 .

[18]  Do-Hyung Park,et al.  eWOM overload and its effect on consumer behavioral intention depending on consumer involvement , 2008, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[19]  Changsu Kim,et al.  USER PERCEPTION OF THE QUALITY, VALUE, AND UTILITY OF USER-GENERATED CONTENT , 2012 .

[20]  Stephanie Watts,et al.  Capitalizing on Content: Information Adoption in Two Online communities , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Sung-joon Yoon,et al.  A SOCIAL NETWORK APPROACH TO THE INFLUENCES OF SHOPPING EXPERIENCES ON E-WOM , 2012 .

[22]  Yubo Chen,et al.  Online Consumer Review: Word-of-Mouth as a New Element of Marketing Communication Mix , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[23]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Competition between Local and Electronic Markets: How the Benefit of Buying Online Depends on Where You Live , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[24]  David Godes,et al.  Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication , 2004 .

[25]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[26]  Yong Liu Word-of-Mouth for Movies: Its Dynamics and Impact on Box Office Revenue , 2006 .

[27]  Thomas A. Schwandt Qualitative Inquiry: A Dictionary of Terms , 1997 .

[28]  Qi Lu,et al.  MODERATING EFFECTS OF PRODUCT HETEROGENEITY BETWEEN ONLINE WORD-OF-MOUTH AND HOTEL SALES , 2014 .

[29]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  What drives consumers to spread electronic word of mouth in online consumer-opinion platforms , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[30]  Jason Q. Zhang,et al.  When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews☆ , 2010 .

[31]  Milena M. Head,et al.  Manipulating perceived social presence through the web interface and its impact on attitude towards online shopping , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[32]  William R. Swinyard,et al.  Attitude-Behavior Consistency: The Impact of Product Trial versus Advertising: , 1983 .

[33]  Pranjal Gupta,et al.  How e-WOM recommendations influence product consideration and quality of choice: A motivation to process information perspective , 2010 .

[34]  S. Li,et al.  The Influence of eWOM on Virtual Consumer Communities: Social Capital, Consumer Learning, and Behavioral Outcomes , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[35]  Dwayne D. Gremler,et al.  Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? , 2004 .

[36]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  On risk, convenience, and Internet shopping behavior , 2000, CACM.

[37]  Sonia San Martín Gutiérrez,et al.  Product and channel-related risk and involvement in online contexts , 2010, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[38]  S. Forsythe,et al.  Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in Internet shopping , 2003 .

[39]  M. Brucks The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior , 1985 .

[40]  Ingoo Han,et al.  The Effects of Consumer Knowledge on Message Processing of Electronic Word of Mouth via Online Consumer Reviews , 2008, ECIS.

[41]  Bin Fang,et al.  Learning from other buyers: The effect of purchase history records in online marketplaces , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[42]  Xin Luo,et al.  Impact of informational factors on online recommendation credibility: The moderating role of source credibility , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[43]  Jun Li,et al.  Online consumer-to-consumer market in China - A comparative study of Taobao and eBay , 2008, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[44]  Nena Lim,et al.  Consumers' perceived risk: sources versus consequences , 2003, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[45]  R. Goldsmith,et al.  Measuring Motivations for Online Opinion Seeking , 2006 .

[46]  L. J. Harrison‐Walker The Measurement of Word-of-Mouth Communication and an Investigation of Service Quality and Customer Commitment As Potential Antecedents , 2001 .

[47]  C. A. Matos,et al.  Word-of-mouth communications in marketing: a meta-analytic review of the antecedents and moderators , 2008 .

[48]  Bo Sophia Xiao,et al.  The Impact of Observational Learning and Electronic Word of Mouth on Consumer Purchase Decisions: The Moderating Role of Consumer Expertise and Consumer Involvement , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[49]  Dimple R. Thadani,et al.  The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[50]  N. Lee,et al.  Word of mouth communication within online communities: Conceptualizing the online social network , 2007 .

[51]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[52]  Jinhong Xie,et al.  Online Social Interactions: A Natural Experiment on Word of Mouth versus Observational Learning , 2010 .

[53]  Jillian C. Sweeney,et al.  The Relationship between Electronic Word-Of-Mouth Motivations and Message Characteristics: The Sender's Perspective , 2013 .

[54]  Peter S. Fader,et al.  On the Depth and Dynamics of Online Search Behavior , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[55]  Lakshmi S. Iyer,et al.  Trust in e-commerce , 2005, CACM.

[56]  James C. Ward,et al.  Virtual Community: a Sociocognitive Analysis , 1996 .

[57]  Ingoo Han,et al.  The Effect of On-Line Consumer Reviews on Consumer Purchasing Intention: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 2007, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[58]  David Mazursky,et al.  The effects of cognitive thinking style and ambient scent on online consumer approach behavior, experience approach behavior, and search motivation , 2011 .

[59]  Sandra Streukens,et al.  Service innovation and electronic word‐of‐mouth: is it worth listening to? , 2009 .