Development of the Escape Response in Teleost Fishes: Do Ontogenetic Changes Enable Improved Performance?*

Teleost fishes typically first encounter the environment as free‐swimming embryos or larvae. Larvae are morphologically distinct from adults, and major anatomical structures are unformed. Thus, larvae undergo a series of dramatic morphological changes until they reach adult morphology (but are reproductively immature) and are considered juveniles. Free‐swimming embryos and larvae are able to perform a C‐start, an effective escape response that is used evade predators. However, escape response performance improves during early development: as young fish grow, they swim faster (length‐specific maximum velocity increases) and perform the escape more rapidly (time to complete the behavior decreases). These improvements cease when fish become juveniles, although absolute swimming velocity (m s−1) continues to increase. We use studies of escape behavior and ontogeny in California halibut (Paralichthys californicus), rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), and razorback suckers (Xyrauchen texanus) to test the hypothesis that specific morphological changes improve escape performance. We suggest that formation of the caudal fin improves energy transfer to the water and therefore increases thrust production and swimming velocity. In addition, changes to the axial skeleton during the larval period produce increased axial stiffness, which in turn allows the production of a more rapid and effective escape response. Because escape performance improves as adult morphology develops, fish that enter the environment in an advanced stage of development (i.e., those with direct development) should have a greater ability to evade predators than do fish that enter the environment at an early stage of development (i.e., those with indirect development).

[1]  Richard J. Wassersug,et al.  Tadpole Locomotion: Axial Movement and Tail Functions in a Largely Vertebraeless Vertebrate1 , 2000 .

[2]  A. F. Bennett,et al.  RAPID EVOLUTION OF ESCAPE ABILITY IN TRINIDADIAN GUPPIES (POECILIA RETICULATA) , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  G. Barlow,et al.  Fishes of the world , 2004, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[4]  J. Buskirk,et al.  Influence of tail shape on tadpole swimming performance. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[5]  T. Daniel Unsteady Aspects of Aquatic Locomotion , 1984 .

[6]  Johnston,et al.  The biomechanics of fast-starts during ontogeny in the common carp cyprinus carpio , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[7]  D. P. Swain THE FUNCTIONAL BASIS OF NATURAL SELECTION FOR VERTEBRAL TRAITS OF LARVAE IN THE STICKLEBACK GASTEROSTEUS ACULEATUS , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  Paul W. Webb,et al.  Fast-start Performance and Body Form in Seven Species of Teleost Fish , 1978 .

[9]  R. Piedrahita,et al.  Morphological development and allometric growth patterns in hatchery-reared California halibut larvae , 2002 .

[10]  W.,et al.  EARLY DEVELOPMENT OF THE RAZORBACK SUCKER , XYRA UCHEN TEXANUS ( ABBOTT ) , 2018 .

[11]  E. Houde Patterns and consequences of selective processes in teleost early life histories , 1997 .

[12]  Paul W. Webb,et al.  EFFECTS OF MEDIAN-FIN AMPUTATION ON FAST-START PERFORMANCE OF RAINBOW TROUT (SALMO GAIRDNERI) , 1977 .

[13]  John H. Long,et al.  The Importance of Body Stiffness in Undulatory Propulsion , 1996 .

[14]  W. R. Taylor,et al.  An enzyme method of clearing and staining small vertebrates , 1967 .

[15]  Hale,et al.  Mechanics of the fast-start: muscle function and the role of intramuscular pressure in the escape behavior of amia calva and polypterus palmas , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  Paul W. Webb,et al.  Functional Locomotor Morphology of Early Life History Stages of Fishes , 1986 .

[17]  F. Binkowski,et al.  Vulnerability of early life intervals of Coregonus hoyi to predation by a freshwater mysid, Mysis relicta , 1988, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[18]  Carl L. Hubbs,et al.  Fishes of the World. , 1978 .

[19]  D. P. Swain,et al.  SELECTIVE PREDATION FOR VERTEBRAL PHENOTYPE IN GASTEROSTEUS ACULEATUS: REVERSAL IN THE DIRECTION OF SELECTION AT DIFFERENT LARVAL SIZES , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  L. Crowder,et al.  Larval Size and Recruitment Mechanisms in Fishes: Toward a Conceptual Framework , 1988 .

[21]  E. Balon Alternative Ways to Become a Juvenile or a Definitive Phenotype (and on Some Persisting Linguistic Offenses) , 2004, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[22]  Paul W. Webb,et al.  Ontogeny of routine swimming activity and performance in zebra danios (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  M. Horn,et al.  PREDATION BY ODONATE NYMPHS ON LARVAL RAZORBACK SUCKERS (XYRAUCHEN TEXANUS) UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS , 1994 .

[24]  J. Camhi,et al.  Escape response of black mollies (Poecilia sphenops) to predatory dives of a pied kingfisher (Ceryle rudis) , 1993 .

[25]  C. Kimmel,et al.  The development and behavioral characteristics of the startle response in the zebra fish. , 1974, Developmental psychobiology.

[26]  R. Chambers,et al.  Early Life History and Recruitment in Fish Populations , 1997, Chapman & Hall Fish and Fisheries Series.

[27]  D. Carrier Ontogenetic Limits on Locomotor Performance , 1996, Physiological Zoology.

[28]  A. Gibb,et al.  Do Endangered Razorback Suckers Have Poor Larval Escape Performance Relative to Introduced Rainbow Trout , 2003 .

[29]  John H Long,et al.  The notochord of hagfish Myxine glutinosa: visco-elastic properties and mechanical functions during steady swimming. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[30]  Jeffrey A. Walker,et al.  ESTIMATING VELOCITIES AND ACCELERATIONS OF ANIMAL LOCOMOTION: A SIMULATION EXPERIMENT COMPARING NUMERICAL DIFFERENTIATION ALGORITHMS , 1998 .

[31]  Hale,et al.  Locomotor mechanics during early life history: effects of size and ontogeny on fast-start performance of salmonid fishes , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[32]  D. Weihs,et al.  The mechanism of rapid starting of slender fish. , 1973, Biorheology.

[33]  P W Webb,et al.  The effect of size on the fast-start performance of rainbow trout Salmo cairdneri, and a consideration of piscivorous predator-prey interactions. , 1976, The Journal of experimental biology.

[34]  Robert W. Blake,et al.  ESCAPE TRAJECTORIES IN ANGELFISH (PTEROPHYLLUM EIMEKEI) , 1993 .

[35]  W. Minckley,et al.  Early development of the razorback sucker, Xyrauchen texanus (Abbott) , 1982 .

[36]  E. Werner,et al.  THE ONTOGENETIC NICHE AND SPECIES INTERACTIONS IN SIZE-STRUCTURED POPULATIONS , 1984 .

[37]  John H. Long,et al.  Stiffness and Damping Forces in the Intervertebral Joints of Blue Marlin (Makaira Nigricans) , 1992 .

[38]  J. Osse,et al.  Body Size and Swimming Types in Carp Larvae; Effects of Being Small , 2000 .

[39]  L. Fuiman,et al.  Ontogeny, growth and the recruitment process , 1997 .

[40]  James Scaling of muscle performance during escape responses in the fish myoxocephalus scorpius L , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[41]  J. H. Long Morphology, mechanics, and locomotion: the relation between the notochord and swimming motions in sturgeon , 2004, Environmental Biology of Fishes.