Restricted Principal Components Analysis for Marketing Research

Purpose – Principal components analysis (PCA) is one of the foremost multivariate methods utilized in marketing and business research for data reduction, latent variable modeling, multicollinearity resolution, etc. However, while its optimal properties make PCA solutions unique, interpreting the results of such analyses can be problematic. A plethora of rotation methods are available for such interpretive uses, but there is no theory as to which rotation method should be applied in any given social science problem. In addition, different rotational procedures typically render different interpretive results. The paper aims to introduce restricted PCA (RPCA), which attempts to optimally derive latent components whose coefficients are integer‐constrained (e.g.: {−1,0,1}, {0,1}, etc.).Design/methodology/approach – The paper presents two algorithms for deriving efficient solutions for RPCA: an augmented branch and bound algorithm for sequential extraction, and a combinatorial optimization procedure for simultaneous extraction of these constrained components. The paper then contrasts the traditional PCA‐derived solution with those obtained from both proposed RPCA procedures with respect to a published data set of psychographic variables collected from potential buyers of the Dodge Viper sports car.Findings – This constraint results in solutions which are easily interpretable with no need for rotation. In addition, the proposed procedure can enhance data reduction efforts since fewer raw variables define each derived component.Originality/value – The paper provides two algorithms for estimating RPCA solutions from empirical data.

[1]  R. Preisendorfer,et al.  Principal Component Analysis in Meteorology and Oceanography , 1988 .

[2]  E. Smith Methods of Multivariate Analysis , 1997 .

[3]  Calyampudi R. Rao The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research , 1964 .

[4]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Alternative Perceptual Mapping Techniques: Relative Accuracy and Usefulness , 1979 .

[5]  Sudhir H. Kale,et al.  Dealer Perceptions of Manufacturer Power and Influence Strategies in a Developing Country , 1986 .

[6]  I. Jolliffe,et al.  A Modified Principal Component Technique Based on the LASSO , 2003 .

[7]  R. Belk,et al.  Children's Recognition of Consumption Symbolism in Children's Products , 1984 .

[8]  J. E. Jackson A User's Guide to Principal Components , 1991 .

[9]  D. Midgley Patterns of Interpersonal Information Seeking for the Purchase of a Symbolic Product , 1983 .

[10]  R. Belk Materialism: Trait Aspects of Living in the Material World , 1985 .

[11]  Per Capita,et al.  About the authors , 1995, Machine Vision and Applications.

[12]  I. Jolliffe Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .

[13]  Y. Takane,et al.  Principal component analysis with external information on both subjects and variables , 1991 .

[14]  Lakshman Krishnamurthi,et al.  Response Function Estimation Using the Equity Estimator , 1991 .

[15]  D. Littler Design and Marketing of New Products , 1981 .

[16]  Ronald D. Anderson,et al.  A Simulation Study of Factor Score Indeterminacy , 1986 .

[17]  W. R. Dillon,et al.  On the Use of Component Scores in the Presence of Group Structure , 1989 .

[18]  C. Jordan,et al.  Mémoire sur les formes bilinéaires. , 1874 .

[19]  Theo Gasser,et al.  Simple component analysis , 2004 .

[20]  Joel Huber,et al.  Separating Perceptual Dimensions from Affective Overtones: An Application to Consumer Aesthetics , 1979 .

[21]  Ian T. Jolliffe,et al.  Rotation of principal components: Some comments , 1987 .

[22]  William R. Dillon,et al.  Decision Issues in Building Perceptual Product Spaces with Multi-attribute Rating Data , 1985 .

[23]  J. Sheth,et al.  A Model of Primary Voter Behavior , 1985 .

[24]  Ian T. Jolliffe,et al.  The Simplified Component Technique: An Alternative to Rotated Principal Components , 2000 .

[25]  Brian W. Kernighan,et al.  An Effective Heuristic Algorithm for the Traveling-Salesman Problem , 1973, Oper. Res..

[26]  G. Burroughs,et al.  THE ROTATION OF PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS , 1961 .

[27]  H. Hotelling Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. , 1933 .

[28]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation , 1993 .

[29]  J. Edward Jackson,et al.  A User's Guide to Principal Components. , 1991 .

[30]  Michaf. L. B. Richman Rotation of principal components: a reply , 1987 .

[31]  R. Belk,et al.  Predictors of Attendance at the Performing Arts , 1980 .

[32]  Karl Pearson F.R.S. LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space , 1901 .

[33]  Y. Takane,et al.  Constrained Principal Component Analysis: Various Applications , 2002 .

[34]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Design and marketing of new products , 1980 .

[35]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Measurement of Individual Differences in Visual Versus Verbal Information Processing , 1985 .

[36]  Girish N. Punj,et al.  A Typology of Individual Search Strategies Among Purchasers of New Automobiles , 1984 .

[37]  Morris B. Holbrook,et al.  Feature Interactions in Consumer Judgments of Verbal Versus Pictorial Presentations , 1981 .

[38]  J. Zaichkowsky Measuring the Involvement Construct , 1985 .

[39]  W. DeSarbo,et al.  Constrained canonical correlation , 1982 .

[40]  D. Brinberg,et al.  Assessing attribute importance: a comparison of six methods , 1986 .

[41]  S. Vines Simple principal components , 2000 .

[42]  Jan de Leeuw,et al.  Component analysis with different sets of constraints on different dimensions , 1995 .

[43]  Ikujiro Nonaka,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Country of Origin on Product Evaluations: A New Methodological Perspective , 1985 .