Equivalent intrinsic blur in amblyopia

We used Gaussian blurred stimuli to explore the effect of blur on three tasks: (i) 2-line resolution; (ii) line detection; and (iii) spatial interval discrimination, in observers with amblyopia due to anisometropia, strabismus, or both. The results of our experiments can be summarized as follows. (i) 2-Line resolution: in normal foveal vision, thresholds for unblurred stimuli are approx. 0.5 min arc in the fovea. When the standard deviation (sigma) of the stimulus blur is less than 0.5 min, it has little effect upon 2-line resolution; however, thresholds are degraded when the stimulus blur, sigma, exceeds 0.5 min. We operationally define this transition point, as the equivalent intrinsic blur, or Bi. When the stimulus blur, sigma, is greater than Bi, then the resolution threshold is approximately equal to sigma. In all of the amblyopic eyes, 2-line resolution thresholds for unblurred stimuli were elevated, and the equivalent intrinsic blur was much larger. When the stimulus blur exceeds the equivalent intrinsic blur, resolution thresholds were similar in amblyopic and nonamblyopic eyes. (ii) Line detection: in both normal and amblyopic eyes, when the stimulus blur, sigma, is less than Bi, then the line detection threshold is approximately inversely proportional to sigma; i.e. (it obeys Ricco's law). When sigma is greater than Bi, the equivalent intrinsic blur, then the detection threshold is approximately a fixed contrast. All of the amblyopic eyes showed markedly elevated thresholds for detecting thin lines, but normal or near normal thresholds for detecting very blurred lines. Consequently, Ricco's diameter is larger in amblyopic than in normal eyes. (iii) Spatial interval discrimination: thresholds are proportional to the separation of the lines (i.e. Weber's law). At the optimal separation, spatial interval discrimination thresholds represent a "hyperacuity" (i.e. they are smaller than the resolution threshold). For unblurred lines, the optimal separation is approx. 2-3 times Bi. In the normal fovea, and in the amblyopic eyes of anisometropic amblyopes the optimal spatial interval discrimination threshold is about one-fifth of the resolution threshold (i.e. a hyperacuity); and over a wide range of separations, spatial interval discrimination thresholds begin to rise when the stimulus blur exceeds about one-third of the separation between the lines as long as the contrast is sufficiently high. In contrast, in strabismic amblyopes, like the normal periphery, the optimal spatial interval discrimination thresholds are worse (higher) than would be expected based upon the resolution limit of the strabismic amblyopic eye.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

[1]  B M Dow,et al.  The mapping of visual space onto foveal striate cortex in the macaque monkey , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  Ruth E. Manny,et al.  A three alternative tracking paradigm to measure vernier acuity of older infants , 1985, Vision Research.

[3]  Arthur Bradley,et al.  Is reduced vernier acuity in amblyopia due to position, contrast or fixation deficits? , 1985, Vision Research.

[4]  M. C. Flom,et al.  Monocular spatial distortion in strabismic amblyopia. , 1981, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  H E Bedell,et al.  Normal and abnormal space perception. , 1983, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[6]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Scale invariant features of differential spatial displacement discrimination , 1987, Vision Research.

[7]  S. Klein,et al.  Hyperacuity thresholds of 1 sec: theoretical predictions and empirical validation. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[8]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Vernier acuity is less than grating acuity in 2- and 3-month-olds , 1987, Vision Research.

[9]  J. Flynn Spatial summation in amblyopia. , 1967, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  S. Klein,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification , 1985, Vision Research.

[11]  R. J. Watt,et al.  Spatial information and uncertainty in anisometropic amblyopia , 1987, Vision Research.

[12]  S. Klein,et al.  Sampling in spatial vision , 1986, Nature.

[13]  S. Klein,et al.  Positional uncertainty in peripheral and amblyopic vision , 1987, Vision Research.

[14]  Allan W. Snyder Hyperacuity and interpolation by the visual pathways , 1982, Vision Research.

[15]  R. Watt,et al.  Shape recognition in amblyopia , 1987, Vision Research.

[16]  D M Levi,et al.  Spatio-temporal interactions in anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia. , 1977, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The visual field representation in striate cortex of the macaque monkey: Asymmetries, anisotropies, and individual variability , 1984, Vision Research.

[18]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and amblyopia , 1985, Vision Research.

[19]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Equivalent intrinsic blur in spatial vision , 1990, Vision Research.

[20]  D. Regan,et al.  Opponent model for line interval discrimination: Interval and vernier performance compared , 1987, Vision Research.

[21]  E. Switkes,et al.  Deoxyglucose analysis of retinotopic organization in primate striate cortex. , 1982, Science.

[22]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Selective losses in binocular vision in anisometropic amblyopes , 1986, Vision Research.

[23]  D. G. Green,et al.  Laser Interferometric Acuity In Amblyopia , 1971 .

[24]  A Bradley,et al.  Contrast sensitivity in anisometropic amblyopia. , 1981, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  J A Movshon,et al.  Effects of early unilateral blur on the macaque's visual system. I. Behavioral observations , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[26]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Peripheral positional acuity: Retinal and cortical constraints on 2-dot separation discrimination under photopic and scotopic conditions , 1989, Vision Research.

[27]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Hyperacuity and amblyopia , 1982, Nature.

[28]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Spatial localization in normal and amblyopic vision , 1983, Vision Research.

[29]  G Westheimer,et al.  Editorial: Visual acuity and hyperacuity. , 1975, Investigative ophthalmology.

[30]  R. Hess Developmental sensory impairment: amblyopia or tarachopia? , 1982, Human neurobiology.

[31]  T. Cohn,et al.  Effect of large spatial uncertainty on foveal luminance increment detectability. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[32]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  “Weber's law” for position: Unconfounding the role of separation and eccentricity , 1988, Vision Research.

[33]  R. Hess,et al.  Differences in the neural basis of human amblyopia: The distribution of the anomaly across the visual field , 1985, Vision Research.

[34]  E. F. Miller Investigation of the nature and cause of impaired acuity in amblyopia. , 1955, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[35]  T. Grosvenor The effects of duration and background luminance upon the brightness discrimination of an amblyope. , 1957, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[36]  H E Bedell,et al.  Spatial aberrations and acuity in strabismus and amblyopia. , 1985, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science.

[37]  R. F. Hess,et al.  The threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: Evidence for a two type classification , 1977, Vision Research.

[38]  R. Watt,et al.  A theory of the primitive spatial code in human vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[39]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Physiological basis of anisometropic amblyopia. , 1978, Science.

[40]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Responses of spatial mechanisms can explain hyperacuity , 1986, Vision Research.

[41]  R. Wise,et al.  Neuroleptic-induced "anhedonia" in rats: pimozide blocks reward quality of food. , 1978, Science.

[42]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Model of peripheral and amblyopic hyperacuity , 1991, Vision Research.

[43]  R. J. Watt,et al.  The use of different cues in vernier acuity , 1983, Vision Research.

[44]  S. McKee,et al.  Spatial configurations for visual hyperacuity , 1977, Vision Research.

[45]  F. Campbell,et al.  Differences in the neural basis of human amblyopias: The effect of mean luminance , 1980, Vision Research.

[46]  D M Levi,et al.  The relationship between binocular rivalry and strabismic suppression. , 1985, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[47]  M. Crawford,et al.  Optically induced concomitant strabismus in monkeys. , 1980, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[48]  L. Ling,et al.  Magnification factors and the organization of the human striate cortex. , 1988, Human neurobiology.