Fuel-Cycle and Nuclear Material Disposition Issues Associated with High-Temperature Gas Reactors

The objective of this paper is to facilitate a better understanding of the fuel-cycle and nuclear material disposition issues associated with high-temperature gas reactors (HTGRs). This paper reviews the nuclear fuel cycles supporting early and present day gas reactors, and identifies challenges for the advanced fuel cycles and waste management systems supporting the next generation of HTGRs, including the Very High Temperature Reactor, which is under development in the Generation IV Program. The earliest gas-cooled reactors were the carbon dioxide (CO2)-cooled reactors. Historical experience is available from over 1,000 reactor-years of operation from 52 electricity-generating, CO2-cooled reactor plants that were placed in operation worldwide. Following the CO2 reactor development, seven HTGR plants were built and operated. The HTGR came about from the combination of helium coolant and graphite moderator. Helium was used instead of air or CO2 as the coolant. The helium gas has a significant technical base due to the experience gained in the United States from the 40-MWe Peach Bottom and 330-MWe Fort St. Vrain reactors designed by General Atomics. Germany also built and operated the 15-MWe Arbeitsgemeinschaft Versuchsreaktor (AVR) and the 300-MWe Thorium High-Temperature Reactor (THTR) power plants. The AVR, THTR, Peach Bottom and Fort St. Vrainmore » all used fuel containing thorium in various forms (i.e., carbides, oxides, thorium particles) and mixtures with highly enriched uranium. The operational experience gained from these early gas reactors can be applied to the next generation of nuclear power systems. HTGR systems are being developed in South Africa, China, Japan, the United States, and Russia. Elements of the HTGR system evaluated included fuel demands on uranium ore mining and milling, conversion, enrichment services, and fuel fabrication; fuel management in-core; spent fuel characteristics affecting fuel recycling and refabrication, fuel handling, interim storage, packaging, transportation, waste forms, waste treatment, decontamination and decommissioning issues; and low-level waste (LLW) and high-level waste (HLW) disposal.« less

[1]  D. R. Nicholls,et al.  The Pebble Bed Modular Reactor , 2001 .

[2]  A. J. Neylan,et al.  Reoptimized large HTGR plant using a nonproliferation fuel cycle , 1978 .

[3]  Kazuhiko Kunitomi,et al.  GTHTR300 design and development , 2003 .

[4]  Luc Van,et al.  Dynamic Analysis of Nuclear Energy System Strategies , 2004 .

[5]  W. A. Simon,et al.  The gas-turbine modular helium reactor , 2004 .

[6]  Mujid S. Kazimi,et al.  Nuclear Energy Options for Hydrogen and Hydrogen-Based Liquid Fuels Production , 2003 .

[7]  L. H. Brooks,et al.  HTGR fuel and fuel cycle , 1974 .

[8]  K. J. Notz,et al.  Overview of HTGR fuel recycle , 1976 .

[9]  A. J. Goodjohn,et al.  HTGR fuel and fuel cycle experience in the United States , 1982 .

[10]  L. H. Brooks,et al.  Spent fuel shipping, reprocessing, and recycle fabrication in the HTGR fuel cycle , 1972 .

[11]  F. H. Southworth,et al.  The Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP) Project , 2003 .

[12]  David E. Shropshire.  Lessons Learned From GEN I Carbon Dioxide Cooled Reactors , 2004 .

[13]  S. Jaye,et al.  HTGR FUEL CYCLE ASSESSMENT STUDIES , 1965 .

[14]  Erich Zimmer,et al.  Progress in Th--$sup 233$U recycle technology , 1974 .

[15]  Rothstein.  Fuel cycle cost comparison of choices in U-235 recycle in the HTGR , 1976 .

[16]  S. Saito,et al.  Design of high temperature Engineering Test Reactor (HTTR) , 1994 .

[17]  J. Rastoin,et al.  Evaluation of HTR's for European applications , 1974 .

[18]  C. W. Forsberg,et al.  Options for treating high-temperature gas-cooled reactor fuel for repository disposal , 1992 .

[19]  A. L. Lotts,et al.  HTGR fuel and fuel cycle technology , 1976 .