Impact of SFCL on the Four Types of HVDC Circuit Breakers by Simulation

Recently, studies on HVDC circuit breaker (CB) prototypes have shown successful test results. Nevertheless, effective and reliable solutions regarding massive fault energy during dc fault interruption have not yet been commercialized, and dc current breaking topologies on methods of achieving artificial zero should be somewhat modified. As an alternative, one feasible solution is to combine fault current limiting technologies with dc breaking topologies. In this paper, we studied the application of resistive superconducting fault current limiters (SFCLs) on various types of HVDC CB in order to estimate the effects of combining fault current limiters and conventional dc breakers. For the simulation works, four types of dc breaker topologies were modeled, including a mechanical CB using black-box arc model, a passive resonance CB (PRCB), an inverse current injection CB, and a hybrid HVDC CB. In addition, a resistive SFCL was simulated and added to the dc breakers to verify its interruption characteristic and distributed energy across HVDC CB. From the simulation results, we found that the maximum fault current, interruption time, and dissipated energy stress on the HVDC CB could be decreased by applying SFCL. In addition, it was observed that, among four types of HVDC CB, PRCB with SFCL exhibited the best observable enhancement.

[1]  Jin Yang,et al.  Multiterminal DC Wind Farm Collection Grid Internal Fault Analysis and Protection Design , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[2]  Christian M. Franck,et al.  Fault Current Interruption in Multiterminal HVDC Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[3]  Lou van der Sluis,et al.  An Improved Mayr-Type Arc Model Based on Current-Zero Measurements , 2000 .

[4]  G. Burt,et al.  Analysis of Energy Dissipation in Resistive Superconducting Fault-Current Limiters for Optimal Power System Performance , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[5]  Michael Max Walter,et al.  Switching arcs in passive resonance HVDC circuit breakers , 2013 .

[6]  Mathias Noe,et al.  High-temperature superconductor fault current limiters: concepts, applications, and development status , 2007 .

[7]  Boon-Teck Ooi,et al.  Protection of VSC-multi-terminal HVDC against DC faults , 2002, 2002 IEEE 33rd Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37289).

[8]  Ajay G. Gawande,et al.  Hybrid HVDC Breaker , 2014 .

[9]  Rong Zeng,et al.  Precharging and DC Fault Ride-Through of Hybrid MMC-Based HVDC Systems , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[10]  Tao Yu,et al.  Reliability Improvement Strategies for HVDC Transmission System , 2013 .

[11]  Umer Amir Khan,et al.  Feasibility analysis of the application and positioning of DC HTS FCL in a DC microgrid through modeling and simulation using Simulink and SimPowerSystem , 2011 .

[12]  Jung-Wook Park,et al.  Effect of a SFCL on Commutation Failure in a HVDC System , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[13]  Seongeun Yang,et al.  Development and Grid Operation of Superconducting Fault Current Limiters in KEPCO , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[14]  K. Kamei,et al.  HVDC Circuit Breakers for HVDC Grid Applications , 2015 .

[15]  Umer Amir Khan,et al.  A Novel Model of HVDC Hybrid-Type Superconducting Circuit Breaker and Its Performance Analysis for Limiting and Breaking DC Fault Currents , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[16]  Yasuyuki Shirai,et al.  Simulation study on operating characteristics of superconducting fault current limiter in one-machine infinite bus power system , 2003 .

[17]  C M Franck,et al.  HVDC Circuit Breakers: A Review Identifying Future Research Needs , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[18]  O. Mayr Beiträge zur Theorie des statischen und des dynamischen Lichtbogens , 1943 .

[19]  Lie Xu,et al.  DC fault analysis of VSC based multi-terminal HVDC systems , 2012 .