Comparison of the tetrazolium salt assay for succinate dehydrogenase with the cytosensor microphysiometer in the assessment of compound toxicities.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. W. Parce,et al. Biosensors based on the energy metabolism of living cells: the physical chemistry and cell biology of extracellular acidification. , 1992, Biosensors & bioelectronics.
[2] T. Mosmann. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. , 1983, Journal of immunological methods.
[3] J. W. Parce,et al. Testing ocular irritancy in vitro with the silicon microphysiometer. , 1991, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.
[4] J. Valdés,et al. Toxicity of sea nettle toxin to human hepatocytes and the protective effects of phosphorylating and alkylating agents. , 1998, Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology.
[5] J. Watson,et al. The MTT assay underestimates the growth inhibitory effects of interferons. , 1989, British Journal of Cancer.
[6] Y. Maehara,et al. The ATP assay is more sensitive than the succinate dehydrogenase inhibition test for predicting cell viability. , 1987, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.
[7] A. Lehninger. Principles of Biochemistry , 1984 .
[8] J. W. Parce,et al. The cytosensor microphysiometer: biological applications of silicon technology. , 1992, Science.
[9] R. O'Kennedy,et al. Coumarins : biology, applications, and mode of action , 1997 .