Subthreshold features of visual objects: Unseen but not unbound

The object is a basic unit that is thought to organize the way in which we perceive and think about the world. According to theories of object-based attention, perception of unified objects depends on the binding together of the disparate features of each object via attention. Here we show that a visual feature that is not consciously perceived is nonetheless modulated by object-based attention: the influence of a subthreshold motion signal (prime) on subsequent motion perception depended critically on whether it was associated with the attended object or another, spatially overlapping object. These results show that invisibly weak features of attended objects are not lost, but are organized by and selected together with the object by attention.

[1]  J. Duncan.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  Erik Blaser,et al.  Object-based cross-feature attentional modulation from color to motion , 2004, Vision Research.

[3]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  David Melcher,et al.  Spatiotopic temporal integration of visual motion across saccadic eye movements , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Erik Blaser,et al.  Tracking an object through feature space , 2000, Nature.

[6]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[8]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neuroimaging Studies of Attention: From Modulation of Sensory Processing to Top-Down Control , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  M. Valdés-Sosa,et al.  Switching Attention without Shifting the Spotlight: Object-Based Attentional Modulation of Brain Potentials , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Exogenously cued attention triggers competitive selection of surfaces , 2003, Vision Research.

[11]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  D. Burr,et al.  Temporal integration of optic flow, measured by contrast and coherence thresholds , 2001, Vision Research.

[13]  Drew McDermott,et al.  A critique of pure reason 1 , 1987, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[14]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection , 1999, Nature.

[15]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The Psychophysical Evidence for a Binding Problem in Human Vision , 1999, Neuron.

[16]  R. Blake,et al.  Neural strength of visual attention gauged by motion adaptation , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  J-M Hopf,et al.  Dynamics of feature binding during object-selective attention , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  D. Melcher,et al.  Implicit Attentional Selection of Bound Visual Features , 2005, Neuron.

[19]  David Melcher,et al.  The role of attention in central and peripheral motion integration , 2004, Vision Research.

[20]  S. Yantis,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of space-based and object-based attentional control , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.