In this paper I discuss the potential role and utility of photographs in exploring the aesthetic dimension of processes of organizing. Beginning with a review of the growing significance within organization and management studies literature of the so-called ‘non-rational’ elements of human-being at work, I question why these issues appear to have become subjects worthy of specific scholarly attention at the turn of the century (Williams 2001). Within this discussion, I recognise the embodied nature of organization and make links between some of the characteristics of contemporary (Western) consumer culture, and aesthetics – with particular emphasis on the context of work and organizations. Following from this, I move to consider how it might be possible to gather data about these phenomena in an organizational setting. The limitations of language as a medium of articulating aesthetic experience due to the sensory nature of these phenomena are examined as a condition which undermines the efficacy of traditional text-based research methods and I argue that these issues necessitate the employment of a more ‘sensually complete’ methodology – introducing the idea of photography as one step towards this end. In order to discuss the epistemological and methodological implications of this approach, I reflect on my experiences during an ethnographic study of the web-site design department of a global IT firm to suggest that photographs taken by the respondents of their work environment helped them to express the largely ineffable aesthetic experiences that resulted from the relationships they had with their physical surroundings. The photographs were used by the respondents in this research as a means of communicating their aesthetic experience during semi-structured interviews where the images served both as an ‘aesthetic lens’ through which to explore my research questions and as foci for discussion and reflection about those questions. Some of these photographs are displayed in this paper, juxtaposed with my narrative accounts to create what Mitchell (1994) has called an image-text. This rests on the assumption that written texts and images have relative merits as modes of dissemination in their own right, with neither taking precedence over the other in terms of authority, or claim to ‘truth’. As part of this discussion I problematize some assumptions about the capacity of images to serve as realist representations, arguing instead that photographic images are partial, selected and subjective interpretations of one reality wholly dependent on the photographers ‘visual culture’ (Pink 2001). In concluding, I briefly mention some of the practical and ethical issues surrounding the use of a camera and the taking of photographs in the research arena.
[1]
Barbara Czarniawska.
Writing Management: Organization Theory as a Literary Genre
,
1999
.
[2]
S. Linstead,et al.
Jokers Wild: The Importance of Humour in the Maintenance of Organizational Culture
,
1985
.
[3]
David L. Collinson,et al.
'Engineering Humour': Masculinity, Joking and Conflict in Shop-floor Relations
,
1988
.
[4]
George Ritzer,et al.
Enchanting a disenchanted world : revolutionizing the means of consumption
,
1999
.
[5]
Brian H. Kleiner,et al.
The managed heart: the commercialisation of human feeling – and its dangers
,
2001
.
[6]
S. Langer.
Philosophy in a new key : a study in the symbolism of reason, rite, and art
,
1944
.
[7]
Stephen Fineman,et al.
Emotion in Organizations.
,
1995
.
[8]
Antonio Strati,et al.
Aesthetic Understanding of Organizational Life
,
1992
.
[9]
Dona Schwartz.
Visual ethnography: Using photography in qualitative research
,
1989
.
[10]
George E. Marcus,et al.
The Modernist Sensibility in Recent Ethnographic Writing and the Cinematic Metaphor of Montage
,
1990
.
[11]
Antonio Strati,et al.
Organization and Aesthetics
,
1999
.
[12]
Richard A. Watson.
The Picture Theory
,
1995
.
[13]
Pasquale Gagliardi,et al.
Exploring the Aesthetic Side of Organizational Life
,
1999
.
[14]
Peggy Kamuf,et al.
A Derrida Reader: Between the Blinds
,
1991
.
[15]
Nicholas Mirzoeff,et al.
The visual culture reader
,
2002
.
[16]
Martyn Hammersley,et al.
Ethnography : Principles in Practice
,
1983
.
[17]
Stephen Linstead,et al.
The Aesthetics of Organization
,
2000
.
[18]
Raymond Williams.
Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society
,
1976
.
[19]
B. Latour.
Visualization and cognition: thinking with eyes and hands
,
1986
.
[20]
Simon J Williams,et al.
Emotion and Social Theory: Corporeal Reflections on the (Ir)Rational
,
2001
.
[21]
Stephen Linstead,et al.
Objectivity, Reflexivity, and Fiction: Humanity, Inhumanity, and the Science of the Social
,
1994
.
[22]
I. Grugulis.
Nothing Serious? Candidates’ Use of Humour in Management Training
,
2002
.
[23]
Glenn E. Nilson.
Emotion in Organizations
,
1995
.
[24]
Frederick Winslow Taylor,et al.
科学管理原理=The principles of scientific management
,
2014
.
[25]
Anat Rafaeli,et al.
Aesthetic Symbols as Emotional Cues
,
2000
.
[26]
Antonio Strati.
The Aesthetic Approach in Organization Studies
,
2000
.