An acoustic model of communicative efficiency in consonants and vowels taking into account context distinctiveness

Speaking is generally considered efficient in that less effort is spent articulating more redundant items. With efficient speech production, less reduction is expected in the pronunciation of phonemes that are more important (distinctive) for word identification. The importance of a single phoneme in word recognition can be quantified as the information (in bits) it adds to the preceding word onset to narrow down the context corrected lexical search. In our study, segmental information showed to correlateconsistently with both duration and spectral reduction in vowels and most consonants. No such correlations were found for stops and only little for nasals. This correlation was found after accounting for speaker and vowel identity, speaking style, lexical stress, modeledprominence, position in the syllable, and position of the phoneme in the word. We conclude that speech is organized for efficiency at the level of the phoneme.

[1]  B. M. Streefkerk.  Prominence. Acoustic and lexical/syntactic correlates , 2002 .

[2]  Dick R. van Bergem,et al.  Acoustic vowel reduction as a function of sentence accent, word stress, and word class , 1993, Speech Commun..

[3]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Rethinking the Word Frequency Effect: The Neglected Role of Distributional Information in Lexical Processing , 2001, Language and speech.

[4]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Spoken word recognition and production , 1995 .

[5]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary , 1987 .

[6]  Louis C. W. Pols,et al.  Perisegmental speech improves consonant and vowel identification , 1999, Speech Communication.

[7]  Anne Cutler.  Speaking for listening , 1987 .

[8]  Nelleke Oostdijk,et al.  The Spoken Dutch Corpus. Overview and First Evaluation , 2000, LREC.

[9]  Matthew P. Aylett,et al.  Stochastic suprasegmentals: relationships between redundancy, prosodic structure and care of articulation in spontaneous speech , 2000, INTERSPEECH.

[10]  Barbertje M. Streefkerk.  ACOUSTICAL AND LEXICAL/SYNTACTIC FEATURES TO PREDICT PROMINENCE 1 , 2001 .

[11]  V.W. Zue,et al.  The use of speech knowledge in automatic speech recognition , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[12]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Speech, language, and communication , 1997 .

[13]  Louis C. W. Pols,et al.  Evidence for efficiency in vowel production , 2002, INTERSPEECH.

[14]  Francis J. Smith,et al.  A Comparison of Human and Statistical Language Model Performance using Missing-Word Tests , 1997 .

[15]  Louis C. W. Pols,et al.  Effects of stress and lexical structure on speech efficiency , 1999, EUROSPEECH.

[16]  D. Kemmerer,et al.  Phonotactics and Syllable Stress: Implications for the Processing of Spoken Nonsense Words , 1997, Language and speech.

[17]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The comparative perspective on spoken-language processing , 1997, Speech Commun..

[18]  Diana Binnenpoorte,et al.  The IFA corpus: a phonemically segmented dutch "open source" speech database , 2001, INTERSPEECH.

[19]  D Norris,et al.  Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Role of articulation in speech perception: clues from production. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  L P Shapiro,et al.  "How to milk a coat:" the effects of semantic and acoustic information on phoneme categorization. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Sandra P. Whiteside,et al.  Verbo-motor priming in the phonetic encoding of real and non-words , 1999, EUROSPEECH.

[23]  P. Lieberman.  Some Effects of Semantic and Grammatical Context on the Production and Perception of Speech , 1963 .

[24]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Least effort and the origins of scaling in human language , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Florien J. van Beinum,et al.  Efficiency as an organizing principle of natural speech , 1998, ICSLP.

[26]  Louis C. W. Pols,et al.  An acoustic description of consonant reduction , 1999, Speech Commun..

[27]  Ramon Ferrer i Cancho,et al.  The small world of human language , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.