Naive, effector, and memory CD8 T cells in protection against pulmonary influenza virus infection: homing properties rather than initial frequencies are crucial.

The goal of adoptive immunotherapy is to target a high number of persisting effector cells to the site of a virus infection or tumor. In this study, we compared the protective value of hemagglutinin peptide-specific CD8 T cells generated from the clone-4 TCR-transgenic mice, defined by different stages of their differentiation, against lethal pulmonary influenza infection. We show that the adoptive transfer of high numbers of Ag-specific unprimed, naive CD8 T cells failed to clear the pulmonary virus titer and to promote host survival. The same numbers of in vitro generated primary Ag-specific Tc1 effector cells, producing high amounts of IFN-gamma, or resting Tc1 memory cells, generated from these effectors, were protective. Highly activated CD62Llow Tc1 effectors accumulated in the lung with rapid kinetics and most efficiently reduced the pulmonary viral titer early during infection. The resting CD62Lhigh naive and memory populations first increased in cell numbers in the draining lymph nodes. Subsequently, memory cells accumulated more rapidly and to a greater extent in the lung lavage as compared with naive cells. Thus, effector cells are most effective against a localized virus infection, which correlates with their ability to rapidly distribute at the infected tissue site. The finding that similar numbers of naive Ag-specific CD8 T cells are not protective supports the view that qualitative differences between the two resting populations, the naive and the memory population, may play a major role in their protective value against disease.

[1]  R. Zinkernagel,et al.  Immunological Memory , 2006 .

[2]  A. Cerwenka,et al.  Migration Kinetics and Final Destination of  Type 1 and Type 2 CD8 Effector Cells Predict Protection against Pulmonary Virus Infection , 1999, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[3]  D. Kioussis,et al.  Contribution of  Virus-specific CD8+ Cytotoxic T Cells to Virus Clearance or Pathologic Manifestations of Influenza Virus Infection in a T Cell Receptor Transgenic Mouse Model , 1998, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[4]  R. Ahmed,et al.  Alterations in Cell Surface Carbohydrates on T Cells from Virally Infected Mice Can Distinguish Effector/Memory CD8+ T Cells from Naive Cells , 1998 .

[5]  R. Kedl,et al.  Qualitative differences between naive and memory T cells make a major contribution to the more rapid and efficient memory CD8+ T cell response. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[6]  A. Cerwenka,et al.  In vivo persistence of CD8 polarized T cell subsets producing type 1 or type 2 cytokines. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[7]  J. Altman,et al.  Virus-specific CD8+ T cells in primary and secondary influenza pneumonia. , 1998, Immunity.

[8]  C. Mackay,et al.  Flexible Programs of Chemokine Receptor Expression on Human Polarized T Helper 1 and 2 Lymphocytes , 1998, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[9]  J. Altman,et al.  Counting antigen-specific CD8 T cells: a reevaluation of bystander activation during viral infection. , 1998, Immunity.

[10]  P. Allavena,et al.  Differential Expression of Chemokine Receptors and Chemotactic Responsiveness of Type 1 T Helper Cells (Th1s) and Th2s , 1998, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[11]  L. Bradley,et al.  T cell memory. , 1998, Annual review of immunology.

[12]  P. Doherty,et al.  CD8+ T cells clear influenza virus by perforin or Fas-dependent processes. , 1997, Journal of immunology.

[13]  H. Degrendele,et al.  Requirement for CD44 in activated T cell extravasation into an inflammatory site. , 1997, Science.

[14]  K. Mozdzanowska,et al.  Role of the B‐cell response in recovery of mice from primary influenza virus infection , 1997, Immunological reviews.

[15]  P. Doherty,et al.  Effector CD4+ and CD8+ T‐cell mechanisms in the control of respiratory virus infections , 1997, Immunological reviews.

[16]  A. McMichael,et al.  Rapid Effector Function in CD8+ Memory T Cells , 1997, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[17]  R. Welsh,et al.  Cytolytically active memory CTL present in lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus-immune mice after clearance of virus infection. , 1997, Journal of immunology.

[18]  D. Green,et al.  Unequal Death in T Helper Cell (Th)1 and Th2 Effectors: Th1, but not Th2, Effectors Undergo Rapid Fas/FasL-mediated Apoptosis , 1997, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[19]  P. Doherty,et al.  Bone marrow can function as a lymphoid organ during a primary immune response under conditions of disrupted lymphocyte trafficking. , 1997, Journal of immunology.

[20]  R. Zinkernagel,et al.  Protection against immunopathological consequences of a viral infection by activated but not resting cytotoxic T cells: T cell memory without "memory T cells"? , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Martine Tomkowiak,et al.  Resting Memory CD8+ T Cells are Hyperreactive to Antigenic Challenge In Vitro , 1996, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[22]  K. Rosenthal,et al.  Long-lived cytotoxic T lymphocyte memory in mucosal tissues after mucosal but not systemic immunization , 1996, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[23]  M. Croft,et al.  Naive and effector CD4 T cells differ in their requirements for T cell receptor versus costimulatory signals. , 1996, Journal of immunology.

[24]  H. Pircher,et al.  On the role of antigen in maintaining cytotoxic T-cell memory. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  H. Mcdevitt,et al.  CD8(+) T cell-mediated spontaneous diabetes in neonatal mice. , 1996, Journal of immunology.

[26]  H. Pircher,et al.  Visualization, characterization, and turnover of CD8+ memory T cells in virus-infected hosts , 1996, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[27]  V. Maino,et al.  Heterogeneity of intracellular cytokine synthesis at the single-cell level in polarized T helper 1 and T helper 2 populations , 1995, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[28]  M. Croft,et al.  Costimulatory requirements of naive CD4+ T cells. ICAM-1 or B7-1 can costimulate naive CD4 T cell activation but both are required for optimum response. , 1995, Journal of immunology.

[29]  R. Welsh,et al.  In vivo state of antiviral CTL precursors. Characterization of a cycling cell population containing CTL precursors in immune mice. , 1995, Journal of immunology.

[30]  S. Riddell,et al.  Principles for adoptive T cell therapy of human viral diseases. , 1995, Annual review of immunology.

[31]  S. Watson,et al.  Entry of naive CD4 T cells into peripheral lymph nodes requires L- selectin , 1994, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[32]  N. Baumgarth,et al.  Novel features of the respiratory tract T-cell response to influenza virus infection: lung T cells increase expression of gamma interferon mRNA in vivo and maintain high levels of mRNA expression for interleukin-5 (IL-5) and IL-10 , 1994, Journal of virology.

[33]  S. Swain Generation and in vivo persistence of polarized Th1 and Th2 memory cells. , 1994, Immunity.

[34]  P. Doherty,et al.  Concurrent production of interleukin-2, interleukin-10, and gamma interferon in the regional lymph nodes of mice with influenza pneumonia , 1994, Journal of virology.

[35]  M. Croft,et al.  Naive versus memory CD4 T cell response to antigen. Memory cells are less dependent on accessory cell costimulation and can respond to many antigen-presenting cell types including resting B cells. , 1994, Journal of immunology.

[36]  M. Graham,et al.  Response to influenza infection in mice with a targeted disruption in the interferon gamma gene , 1993, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[37]  P. Doherty,et al.  Partitioning of responder CD8+ T cells in lymph node and lung of mice with Sendai virus pneumonia by LECAM-1 and CD45RB phenotype. , 1993, Journal of immunology.

[38]  R. Ahmed,et al.  Immunological memory against viruses. , 1992, Seminars in immunology.

[39]  L. Bradley,et al.  Long-term CD4+ memory T cells from the spleen lack MEL-14, the lymph node homing receptor. , 1992, Journal of immunology.

[40]  M. Merkenschlager,et al.  Memory T cells , 1989, Nature.

[41]  T. Braciale,et al.  In vivo effector function of influenza virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte clones is highly specific , 1984, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[42]  A. McMichael,et al.  Cytotoxic T-cell immunity to influenza. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  M. Fellous,et al.  Interferon-dependent induction of mRNA for the major histocompatibility antigens in human fibroblasts and lymphoblastoid cells. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  Y. L. Lin,et al.  Biological properties of an influenza A virus-specific killer T cell clone. Inhibition of virus replication in vivo and induction of delayed- type hypersensitivity reactions , 1981, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[45]  G. Ada,et al.  Transfer of specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes protects mice inoculated with influenza virus , 1978, Nature.