Naive, effector, and memory CD8 T cells in protection against pulmonary influenza virus infection: homing properties rather than initial frequencies are crucial.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Zinkernagel,et al. Immunological Memory , 2006 .
[2] A. Cerwenka,et al. Migration Kinetics and Final Destination of Type 1 and Type 2 CD8 Effector Cells Predict Protection against Pulmonary Virus Infection , 1999, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[3] D. Kioussis,et al. Contribution of Virus-specific CD8+ Cytotoxic T Cells to Virus Clearance or Pathologic Manifestations of Influenza Virus Infection in a T Cell Receptor Transgenic Mouse Model , 1998, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[4] R. Ahmed,et al. Alterations in Cell Surface Carbohydrates on T Cells from Virally Infected Mice Can Distinguish Effector/Memory CD8+ T Cells from Naive Cells , 1998 .
[5] R. Kedl,et al. Qualitative differences between naive and memory T cells make a major contribution to the more rapid and efficient memory CD8+ T cell response. , 1998, Journal of immunology.
[6] A. Cerwenka,et al. In vivo persistence of CD8 polarized T cell subsets producing type 1 or type 2 cytokines. , 1998, Journal of immunology.
[7] J. Altman,et al. Virus-specific CD8+ T cells in primary and secondary influenza pneumonia. , 1998, Immunity.
[8] C. Mackay,et al. Flexible Programs of Chemokine Receptor Expression on Human Polarized T Helper 1 and 2 Lymphocytes , 1998, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[9] J. Altman,et al. Counting antigen-specific CD8 T cells: a reevaluation of bystander activation during viral infection. , 1998, Immunity.
[10] P. Allavena,et al. Differential Expression of Chemokine Receptors and Chemotactic Responsiveness of Type 1 T Helper Cells (Th1s) and Th2s , 1998, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[11] L. Bradley,et al. T cell memory. , 1998, Annual review of immunology.
[12] P. Doherty,et al. CD8+ T cells clear influenza virus by perforin or Fas-dependent processes. , 1997, Journal of immunology.
[13] H. Degrendele,et al. Requirement for CD44 in activated T cell extravasation into an inflammatory site. , 1997, Science.
[14] K. Mozdzanowska,et al. Role of the B‐cell response in recovery of mice from primary influenza virus infection , 1997, Immunological reviews.
[15] P. Doherty,et al. Effector CD4+ and CD8+ T‐cell mechanisms in the control of respiratory virus infections , 1997, Immunological reviews.
[16] A. McMichael,et al. Rapid Effector Function in CD8+ Memory T Cells , 1997, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[17] R. Welsh,et al. Cytolytically active memory CTL present in lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus-immune mice after clearance of virus infection. , 1997, Journal of immunology.
[18] D. Green,et al. Unequal Death in T Helper Cell (Th)1 and Th2 Effectors: Th1, but not Th2, Effectors Undergo Rapid Fas/FasL-mediated Apoptosis , 1997, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[19] P. Doherty,et al. Bone marrow can function as a lymphoid organ during a primary immune response under conditions of disrupted lymphocyte trafficking. , 1997, Journal of immunology.
[20] R. Zinkernagel,et al. Protection against immunopathological consequences of a viral infection by activated but not resting cytotoxic T cells: T cell memory without "memory T cells"? , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[21] Martine Tomkowiak,et al. Resting Memory CD8+ T Cells are Hyperreactive to Antigenic Challenge In Vitro , 1996, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[22] K. Rosenthal,et al. Long-lived cytotoxic T lymphocyte memory in mucosal tissues after mucosal but not systemic immunization , 1996, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[23] M. Croft,et al. Naive and effector CD4 T cells differ in their requirements for T cell receptor versus costimulatory signals. , 1996, Journal of immunology.
[24] H. Pircher,et al. On the role of antigen in maintaining cytotoxic T-cell memory. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[25] H. Mcdevitt,et al. CD8(+) T cell-mediated spontaneous diabetes in neonatal mice. , 1996, Journal of immunology.
[26] H. Pircher,et al. Visualization, characterization, and turnover of CD8+ memory T cells in virus-infected hosts , 1996, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[27] V. Maino,et al. Heterogeneity of intracellular cytokine synthesis at the single-cell level in polarized T helper 1 and T helper 2 populations , 1995, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[28] M. Croft,et al. Costimulatory requirements of naive CD4+ T cells. ICAM-1 or B7-1 can costimulate naive CD4 T cell activation but both are required for optimum response. , 1995, Journal of immunology.
[29] R. Welsh,et al. In vivo state of antiviral CTL precursors. Characterization of a cycling cell population containing CTL precursors in immune mice. , 1995, Journal of immunology.
[30] S. Riddell,et al. Principles for adoptive T cell therapy of human viral diseases. , 1995, Annual review of immunology.
[31] S. Watson,et al. Entry of naive CD4 T cells into peripheral lymph nodes requires L- selectin , 1994, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[32] N. Baumgarth,et al. Novel features of the respiratory tract T-cell response to influenza virus infection: lung T cells increase expression of gamma interferon mRNA in vivo and maintain high levels of mRNA expression for interleukin-5 (IL-5) and IL-10 , 1994, Journal of virology.
[33] S. Swain. Generation and in vivo persistence of polarized Th1 and Th2 memory cells. , 1994, Immunity.
[34] P. Doherty,et al. Concurrent production of interleukin-2, interleukin-10, and gamma interferon in the regional lymph nodes of mice with influenza pneumonia , 1994, Journal of virology.
[35] M. Croft,et al. Naive versus memory CD4 T cell response to antigen. Memory cells are less dependent on accessory cell costimulation and can respond to many antigen-presenting cell types including resting B cells. , 1994, Journal of immunology.
[36] M. Graham,et al. Response to influenza infection in mice with a targeted disruption in the interferon gamma gene , 1993, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[37] P. Doherty,et al. Partitioning of responder CD8+ T cells in lymph node and lung of mice with Sendai virus pneumonia by LECAM-1 and CD45RB phenotype. , 1993, Journal of immunology.
[38] R. Ahmed,et al. Immunological memory against viruses. , 1992, Seminars in immunology.
[39] L. Bradley,et al. Long-term CD4+ memory T cells from the spleen lack MEL-14, the lymph node homing receptor. , 1992, Journal of immunology.
[40] M. Merkenschlager,et al. Memory T cells , 1989, Nature.
[41] T. Braciale,et al. In vivo effector function of influenza virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte clones is highly specific , 1984, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[42] A. McMichael,et al. Cytotoxic T-cell immunity to influenza. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.
[43] M. Fellous,et al. Interferon-dependent induction of mRNA for the major histocompatibility antigens in human fibroblasts and lymphoblastoid cells. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[44] Y. L. Lin,et al. Biological properties of an influenza A virus-specific killer T cell clone. Inhibition of virus replication in vivo and induction of delayed- type hypersensitivity reactions , 1981, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[45] G. Ada,et al. Transfer of specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes protects mice inoculated with influenza virus , 1978, Nature.