An analysis of three types of partially-known formal concepts

Formal concept analysis with an incomplete context has received much attention recently, where an object is known to have one set of attributes and not have another set of attributes; for the rest of attributes, it is unknown if the object has or does not have them. This has led to a notion called partially-known formal concepts in a framework of three-way concept analysis with interval sets. The intent and/or extent of a partially-known concept may no longer be a set but an interval set. Depending on the set or interval set representation of the intent and extent, there are three different forms of partially-known formal concepts, namely SE-ISI (i.e., set extent and interval-set intent) formal concept, ISE-SI (i.e., interval-set extent and set intent) formal concept and ISE-ISI (i.e., interval-set extent and interval-set intent) formal concept. Although these three forms of partially-known formal concepts have been identified and proposed, their structures and relationships have not been fully investigated. The main objective of this paper is to provide such a study. We adopt a possible-world semantics of an incomplete formal context, i.e., an incomplete formal context is viewed as the family of all its possible completions. This enables us to systematically study the structures of the three different forms of partially-known formal concepts and their relationships. To be consistent with the possible-world semantics, we interpret a partially-known formal concept as the family of formal concepts in completions of an incomplete formal context. In addition to presenting theorems to summarize our results, we use an example to illustrate the main ideas.

[1]  Yao Li,et al.  TDUP: an approach to incremental mining of frequent itemsets with three-way-decision pattern updating , 2015, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

[2]  Richard Holzer Knowledge Acquisition under Incomplete Knowledge using Methods from Formal Concept Analysis: Part I , 2004, Fundam. Informaticae.

[3]  Yao Zhang,et al.  Three-way decisions model based on tolerance rough fuzzy set , 2017, Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern..

[4]  Jian-Min Ma,et al.  Concept acquisition approach of object-oriented concept lattices , 2017, Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern..

[5]  Ling Wei,et al.  The attribute reductions of three-way concept lattices , 2016, Knowledge-Based Systems.

[6]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Three-Way Formal Concept Analysis , 2014, RSKT.

[7]  Bernhard Ganter,et al.  Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations , 1998 .

[8]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Rough-set concept analysis: Interpreting RS-definable concepts based on ideas from formal concept analysis , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[9]  Wei-Zhi Wu,et al.  Three-way concept learning based on cognitive operators: An information fusion viewpoint , 2017, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[10]  Rudolf Wille,et al.  Restructuring Lattice Theory: An Approach Based on Hierarchies of Concepts , 2009, ICFCA.

[11]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  An Outline of a Theory of Three-Way Decisions , 2012, RSCTC.

[12]  Xizhao Wang,et al.  Granular reducts of formal fuzzy contexts , 2016, Knowl. Based Syst..

[13]  Yuhua Qian,et al.  Concept learning via granular computing: A cognitive viewpoint , 2014, Information Sciences.

[14]  Cherukuri Aswani Kumar,et al.  Three-way conceptual approach for cognitive memory functionalities , 2017, Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern..

[15]  Ramón Fuentes-González,et al.  The study of the L-fuzzy concept lattice , 1994 .

[16]  Ling Wei,et al.  The connections between three-way and classical concept lattices , 2016, Knowl. Based Syst..

[17]  Michal Krupka,et al.  Concept Lattices of Incomplete Data , 2012, ICFCA.

[18]  Lifeng Li,et al.  Multi-level interval-valued fuzzy concept lattices and their attribute reduction , 2017, Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern..

[19]  Didier Dubois,et al.  A Possibility-Theoretic View of Formal Concept Analysis , 2007, Fundam. Informaticae.

[20]  Yuhua Qian,et al.  Three-way cognitive concept learning via multi-granularity , 2017, Inf. Sci..

[21]  Jinhai Li,et al.  Incomplete decision contexts: Approximate concept construction, rule acquisition and knowledge reduction , 2013, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[22]  Weihua Xu,et al.  Cognitive concept learning from incomplete information , 2016, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

[23]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Interval-set algebra for qualitative knowledge representation , 1993, Proceedings of ICCI'93: 5th International Conference on Computing and Information.

[24]  Gerd Stumme,et al.  Formal Concept Analysis: foundations and applications , 2005 .

[25]  Prem Kumar Singh,et al.  Three-way fuzzy concept lattice representation using neutrosophic set , 2017, Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern..

[26]  Witold Lipski,et al.  On semantic issues connected with incomplete information databases , 1979, ACM Trans. Database Syst..

[27]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Graduality, Uncertainty and Typicality in Formal Concept Analysis , 2010, 35 Years of Fuzzy Set Theory.

[28]  Sergei A. Obiedkov,et al.  Modal Logic for Evaluating Formulas in Incomplete Contexts , 2002, ICCS.

[29]  Richard Holzer,et al.  On the Treatment of Incomplete Knowledge in Formal Concept Analysis , 2000, ICCS.

[30]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Interval sets and three-way concept analysis in incomplete contexts , 2016, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

[31]  Xizhao Wang,et al.  Comparison of reduction in formal decision contexts , 2017, Int. J. Approx. Reason..