Contrarian deterministic effects on opinion dynamics: “the hung elections scenario”

[1]  S. Redner,et al.  Dynamics of majority rule in two-state interacting spin systems. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[2]  Serge Galam,et al.  Modelling rumors: the no plane Pentagon French hoax case , 2002, cond-mat/0211571.

[3]  S. Galam.  Minority opinion spreading in random geometry , 2002, cond-mat/0203553.

[4]  Yannick Malevergne,et al.  Imitation and contrarian behaviour: hyperbolic bubbles, crashes and chaos , 2001, cond-mat/0109410.

[5]  Heinz Mühlenbein,et al.  Coordination of Decisions in a Spatial Agent Model , 2001, ArXiv.

[6]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Simulating dynamical features of escape panic , 2000, Nature.

[7]  Serge Galam,et al.  Real space renormalization group and totalitarian paradox of majority rule voting , 2000 .

[8]  Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron,et al.  Opinion evolution in closed community , 2000, cond-mat/0101130.

[9]  S. Solomon,et al.  Social percolation models , 1999, adap-org/9909001.

[10]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Mixing beliefs among interacting agents , 2000, Adv. Complex Syst..

[11]  Bastien Chopard,et al.  Competing species dynamics: Qualitative advantage versus geography , 1998, cond-mat/9812361.

[12]  S. Galam.  Social paradoxes of majority rule voting and renormalization group , 1990 .

[13]  Serge Gallam.  Majority rule, hierarchical structures, and democratic totalitarianism: a statistical approach , 1986 .

[14]  S. Galam,et al.  Sociophysics: A new approach of sociological collective behaviour. I. mean‐behaviour description of a strike , 1982, 2211.07041.