MP Twitter Abuse in the Age of COVID-19: White Paper

As COVID-19 sweeps the globe, outcomes depend on effective relationships between the public and decision-makers. In the UK there were uncivil tweets to MPs about perceived UK tardiness to go into lockdown. The pandemic has led to increased attention on ministers with a role in the crisis. However, generally this surge has been civil. Prime minister Boris Johnson's severe illness with COVID-19 resulted in an unusual peak of supportive responses on Twitter. Those who receive more COVID-19 mentions in their replies tend to receive less abuse (significant negative correlation). Following Mr Johnson's recovery, with rising economic concerns and anger about lockdown violations by influential figures, abuse levels began to rise in May. 1,902 replies to MPs within the study period were found containing hashtags or terms that refute the existence of the virus (e.g. #coronahoax, #coronabollocks, 0.04% of a total 4.7 million replies, or 9% of the number of mentions of "stay home save lives" and variants). These have tended to be more abusive. Evidence of some members of the public believing in COVID-19 conspiracy theories was also found. Higher abuse levels were associated with hashtags blaming China for the pandemic.

[1]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Science vs Conspiracy: Collective Narratives in the Age of Misinformation , 2014, PloS one.

[2]  Kalina Bontcheva,et al.  Twits, Twats and Twaddle: Trends in Online Abuse towards UK Politicians , 2018, ICWSM.

[3]  Daniel Freeman,et al.  Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England , 2020, Psychological Medicine.

[4]  Kalina Bontcheva,et al.  Race and Religion in Online Abuse towards UK Politicians: Working Paper , 2019, ArXiv.

[5]  Kalina Bontcheva,et al.  Partisanship, Propaganda and Post-Truth Politics: Quantifying Impact in Online Debate , 2019, ArXiv.

[6]  Matthew Motta,et al.  How Right-Leaning Media Coverage of COVID-19 Facilitated the Spread of Misinformation in the Early Stages of the Pandemic in the U.S. , 2020, Canadian Journal of Political Science.

[7]  Kalina Bontcheva,et al.  Local Media and Geo-situated Responses to Brexit: A Quantitative Analysis of Twitter, News and Survey Data , 2019, ArXiv.

[8]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Emotional Dynamics in the Age of Misinformation , 2015, PloS one.

[9]  Jabra Zarka,et al.  Coronavirus Goes Viral: Quantifying the COVID-19 Misinformation Epidemic on Twitter , 2020, Cureus.

[10]  Amy Binns,et al.  And they thought Papers were Rude , 2018, British Journalism Review.

[11]  Julien Cornebise,et al.  A large-scale crowdsourced analysis of abuse against women journalists and politicians on Twitter , 2019, ArXiv.

[12]  Jose Yunam Cuan-Baltazar,et al.  Misinformation of COVID-19 on the Internet: Infodemiology Study , 2020, JMIR Public Health and Surveillance.

[13]  Shaghayegh Haghjooy Javanmard,et al.  Infodemic and Risk Communication in the Era of CoV-19 , 2020, Advanced biomedical research.

[14]  J. Berry,et al.  From Incivility to Outrage: Political Discourse in Blogs, Talk Radio, and Cable News , 2011 .

[15]  Harith Alani,et al.  Exploring Misogyny across the Manosphere in Reddit , 2019, WebSci.

[16]  T. Scheff,et al.  Blind Trust : Large Groups and Their Leaders in Times of Crisis and Terror , 2004 .

[17]  Liam McLoughlin,et al.  Turds, traitors and tossers: the abuse of UK MPs via Twitter , 2020, The Journal of Legislative Studies.