Evaluation of image fusion methods using PALSAR, RADARSAT-1 and SPOT images for land use/ land cover classification

This research aimed to explore the fusion of multispectral optical SPOT data with microwave L-band ALOS PALSAR and C-band RADARSAT-1 data for a detailed land use/cover mapping to find out the individual contributions of different wavelengths. Many fusion approaches have been implemented and analyzed for various applications using different remote sensing images. However, the fusion methods have conflict in the context of land use/cover (LULC) mapping using optical and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images together. In this research two SAR images ALOS PALSAR and RADARSAT-1 were fused with SPOT data. Although, both SAR data were gathered in same polarization, and had same ground resolution, they differ in wavelengths. As different data fusion methods, intensity hue saturation (IHS), principal component analysis, discrete wavelet transformation, high pass frequency (HPF), and Ehlers, were performed and compared. For the quality analyses, visual interpretation was applied as a qualitative analysis, and spectral quality metrics of the fused images, such as correlation coefficient (CC) and universal image quality index (UIQI) were applied as a quantitative analysis. Furthermore, multispectral SPOT image and SAR fused images were classified with Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC) method for the evaluation of their efficiencies. Ehlers gave the best score in the quality analysis and for the accuracy of LULC on LULC mapping of PALSAR and RADARSAT images. The results showed that the HPF method is in the second place with an increased thematic mapping accuracy. IHS had the worse results in all analyses. Overall, it is indicated that Ehlers method is a powerful technique to improve the LULC classification.

[1]  Nebiye Musaoglu,et al.  Merging multiresolution SPOT P and Landsat TM data: the effects and advantages , 1998 .

[2]  Corina da Costa Freitas,et al.  Mapping impervious surfaces with the integrated use of Landsat Thematic Mapper and radar data: A case study in an urban–rural landscape in the Brazilian Amazon , 2011 .

[3]  FUSION OF SAR IMAGES ( PALSAR AND RADARSAT-1 ) WITH MULTISPECTRAL SPOT IMAGE : A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTING IMAGES , 2008 .

[4]  Christine Pohl,et al.  Multisensor image fusion in remote sensing: concepts, methods and applications , 1998 .

[5]  Luciano Vieira Dutra,et al.  A Comparison of Multisensor Integration Methods for Land Cover Classification in the Brazilian Amazon , 2011 .

[6]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[7]  D. Yıldırım,et al.  IKONOS uydu görüntüleri ile yeni bir görüntü kaynaştirma yöntemi , 2012 .

[8]  John van Genderen,et al.  Structuring contemporary remote sensing image fusion , 2015 .

[9]  J. Wesley Roberts,et al.  Assessment of image fusion procedures using entropy, image quality, and multispectral classification , 2008 .

[10]  T. H. Meyer,et al.  Evaluation of pansharpening algorithms in support of earth observation based rapid-mapping workflows , 2013 .

[11]  Saygin Abdikan,et al.  A comparative data-fusion analysis of multi-sensor satellite images , 2014, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[12]  Brian Wilson,et al.  Assessing ground cover at patch and hillslope scale in semi-arid woody vegetation and pasture using fused Quickbird data , 2012, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[13]  Manfred Ehlers,et al.  Multi-sensor image fusion for pansharpening in remote sensing , 2010 .

[14]  Nebiye Musaoglu,et al.  Merging hyperspectral and panchromatic image data: qualitative and quantitative analysis , 2009 .

[15]  Saygin Abdikan,et al.  Comparison of different fusion algorithms in urban and agricultural areas using sar (palsar and radarsat) and optical (spot) images , 2012 .

[16]  Oguz Gungor,et al.  A novel image fusion method using IKONOS satellite images , 2012 .

[17]  Seema Jalan,et al.  Comparison of different pan-sharpening methods for spectral characteristic preservation: multi-temporal CARTOSAT-1 and IRS-P6 LISS-IV imagery , 2012 .

[18]  D. Amarsaikhan,et al.  Comparison of multisource image fusion methods and land cover classification , 2012 .

[19]  Josaphat Tetuko Sri Sumantyo,et al.  Assessment of pan-sharpening methods applied to image fusion of remotely sensed multi-band data , 2012, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[20]  Yu Zeng,et al.  Image fusion for land cover change detection , 2010 .

[21]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Fusion of TerraSAR-x and Landsat ETM+ data for protected area mapping in Uganda , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[22]  Mario Chica-Olmo,et al.  A comparative assessment of different methods for Landsat 7/ETM+  pansharpening , 2012 .

[23]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[24]  K. Nikolakopoulos.  Comparison of Nine Fusion Techniques for Very High Resolution Data , 2008 .