Estimation of the Functional Failure Probability of a Thermal Hydraulic Passive System by Subset Simulation

Abstract In the light of epistemic uncertainties affecting the model of a thermal–hydraulic (T–H) passive system and the numerical values of its parameters, the system may find itself in working conditions which do not allow it to accomplish its function as required. The estimation of the probability of these functional failures can be done by Monte Carlo (MC) sampling of the uncertainties in the model followed by the computation of the system response by a mechanistic T–H code. The procedure requires considerable computational efforts for achieving accurate estimates. Efficient methods for sampling the uncertainties in the model are thus in order. In this paper, the recently developed Subset Simulation (SS) method is considered for improving the efficiency of the random sampling. The method, originally developed to solve structural reliability problems, is founded on the idea that a small failure probability can be expressed as a product of larger conditional probabilities of some intermediate events: with a proper choice of the conditional events, the conditional probabilities can be made sufficiently large to allow accurate estimation with a small number of samples. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation, based on the Metropolis algorithm, is used to efficiently generate the conditional samples, which is otherwise a non-trivial task. The method is here developed for efficiently estimating the probability of functional failure of an emergency passive decay heat removal system in a simple steady-state model of a Gas-cooled Fast Reactor (GFR). The efficiency of the method is demonstrated by comparison to the commonly adopted standard Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS).

[1]  N. M. Rao,et al.  Steady-state performance of a two-phase natural circulation loop , 2006 .

[2]  Francesco Saverio D'Auria,et al.  Reliability evaluation of a natural circulation system , 2003 .

[3]  George E. Apostolakis,et al.  The Impact of Uncertainties on the Performance of Passive Systems , 2005 .

[4]  Gopika Vinod,et al.  Passive system reliability analysis using the APSRA methodology , 2008 .

[5]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Compartment fire risk analysis by advanced Monte Carlo simulation , 2007 .

[6]  James L. Beck,et al.  Hybrid Subset Simulation method for reliability estimation of dynamical systems subject to stochastic excitation , 2005 .

[7]  G. Apostolakis The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems. , 1990, Science.

[8]  Luciano Burgazzi Addressing the uncertainties related to passive system reliability , 2007 .

[9]  Luciano Burgazzi Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Application for the Safety and Reliability Analysis of a Thermal-Hydraulic Passive System , 2006 .

[10]  G. I. Schuëller,et al.  On the treatment of uncertainties in structural mechanics and analysis , 2007 .

[11]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Two methods for the structured assessment of model uncertainty by experts in performance assessments of radioactive waste repositories , 1996 .

[12]  L. Burgazzi Reliability Evaluation of Passive Systems Through Functional Reliability Assessment , 2003 .

[13]  Lorenzo P Pagani,et al.  On the quantification of safety margins , 2004 .

[14]  George E. Apostolakis,et al.  Risk-Informed Design Changes in a Passive Decay Heat Removal System , 2008 .

[15]  Luciano Burgazzi,et al.  Thermal-hydraulic passive system reliability-based design approach , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  D. Cacuci,et al.  A Comparative Review of Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of Large-Scale Systems—II: Statistical Methods , 2004 .

[17]  P. Vijayan,et al.  Steady state and stability characteristics of single-phase natural circulation in a rectangular loop with different heater and cooler orientations , 2007 .

[18]  Graham B. Wallis,et al.  Evaluation of nuclear safety from the outputs of computer codes in the presence of uncertainties , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[19]  Young-Jong Chung,et al.  Passive cooldown performance of a 65 MW integral reactor , 2008 .

[20]  Luciano Burgazzi,et al.  Passive System Reliability Analysis: A Study on the Isolation Condenser , 2002 .

[21]  G. I. Schuëller,et al.  Benchmark Study on Reliability Estimation in Higher Dimensions of Structural Systems – An Overview , 2007 .

[22]  Lambros S. Katafygiotis,et al.  A two-stage Subset Simulation-based approach for calculating the reliability of inelastic structural systems subjected to Gaussian random excitations , 2005 .

[23]  Lambros S. Katafygiotis,et al.  Application of spherical subset simulation method and auxiliary domain method on a benchmark reliability study , 2007 .

[24]  L. Burgazzi,et al.  The REPAS Study: Reliability Evaluation of Passive Safety Systems , 2002 .

[25]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Augmenting approximate solutions for consistent reliability analysis , 2007 .

[26]  Dimos C. Charmpis,et al.  Application of line sampling simulation method to reliability benchmark problems , 2007 .

[27]  Luciano Burgazzi,et al.  EVALUATION OF UNCERTAINTIES RELATED TO PASSIVE SYSTEMS PERFORMANCE , 2004 .

[28]  John Cleveland,et al.  Natural Circulation in Nuclear Reactor Systems , 2008 .

[29]  A. Introduction,et al.  AN APPROACH FOR USING PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT IN RISK-INFORMED DECISIONS ON PLANT- SPECIFIC CHANGES TO THE LICENSING BASIS , 2009 .

[30]  Annalisa Manera,et al.  Investigating the ESBWR stability with experimental and numerical tools: A comparative study☆ , 2010 .

[31]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[32]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Reliability-based design sensitivity by efficient simulation , 2005 .

[33]  F. D'Auria,et al.  Methodology for the reliability evaluation of a passive system and its integration into a Probabilistic Safety Assessment , 2005 .

[34]  Keh-Han Wang,et al.  Flexible Porous Wave Barrier for Enhanced Wetlands Habitat Restoration , 2003 .

[35]  Elmer E Lewis,et al.  Introduction To Reliability Engineering , 1987 .

[36]  John Cleveland,et al.  IAEA activities on passive safety systems and overview of international development , 2000 .

[37]  Enrico Zio,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process as a systematic approach to the identification of important parameters for the reliability assessment of passive systems , 2003 .

[38]  James L. Beck,et al.  SUBSET SIMULATION AND ITS APPLICATION TO SEISMIC RISK BASED ON DYNAMIC ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[39]  George E. Apostolakis,et al.  Incorporating reliability analysis into the design of passive cooling systems with an application to a gas-cooled reactor , 2008 .

[40]  C. Bassi,et al.  Reliability Assessment of 2400 MWth Gas-Cooled Fast Reactor Natural Circulation Decay Heat Removal in Pressurized Situations , 2008 .

[41]  Attila Guba,et al.  Statistical aspects of best estimate method - I , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[42]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Building confidence in the reliability assessment of thermal-hydraulic passive systems , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[43]  P. Vijayan Experimental observations on the general trends of the steady state and stability behaviour of single-phase natural circulation loops , 2002 .

[44]  M. G. Marietta,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis results obtained in the 1992 performance assessment for the waste isolation pilot plant , 1996 .

[45]  J. Beck,et al.  Estimation of Small Failure Probabilities in High Dimensions by Subset Simulation , 2001 .

[46]  L. Burgazzi,et al.  RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF PASSIVE SAFETY SYSTEMS , 1998 .

[47]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[48]  A. John Arul,et al.  Functional reliability analysis of Safety Grade Decay Heat Removal System of Indian 500 MWe PFBR , 2008 .