Infusion of sex education curricula into transition planning: obstacles and solutions

Although best practice literature centering on the transition of students with disabilities has highlighted the need for holistic planning, few educators have addressed the socio-sexual concerns of students with disabilities in transition plans. Given that appropriate sex education may increase the probability of successful adult adjustment of students with disabilities, efforts must be made to address socio-sexual issues. A particularly appropriate time to address such concerns is during transition planning when educators are preparing students with disabilities to undertake adult roles. The purpose of the current study was to examine educators' perceptions of sex education curricula for students with moderate to severe disabilities and apply these findings to create a strategy for infusing socio-sexual issues into existing curricula and individualized transition plans. The inclusion of socio-sexual concerns in transition encompassed strategies for assuring success of a sex education program, identification of curricular components, methods of modifying the curriculum, and team members involved in programming. © 1997 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.

[1]  D. May,et al.  ARE SPECIAL EDUCATORS PREPARED TO MEET THE SEX EDUCATION NEEDS OF THEIR STUDENTS? A PROGRESS REPORT , 1996 .

[2]  Marleen C. Pugach,et al.  Collaborative Practitioners, Collaborative Schools , 1994 .

[3]  M. McCabe.  Sex education programs for people with mental retardation. , 1993, Mental retardation.

[4]  Paula D. Kohler.  Best Practices in Transition: Substantiated or Implied? , 1993 .

[5]  S. Salend,et al.  Working with Families , 1993 .

[6]  P. Schloss,et al.  Families of Students With Disabilities: Consultation and Advocacy , 1993 .

[7]  J. Martin,et al.  Transition Policy: Infusing Self-Determination and Self-Advocacy into Transition Programs , 1993 .

[8]  E. Brantlinger.  Sexuality Education in the Secondary Special Education Curriculum: Teachers' Perceptions and Concerns , 1992 .

[9]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1993 .

[10]  W. Kempton,et al.  Sex Education for Persons Who are Mentally Handicapped , 1989 .

[11]  Sandra McClennen.  Sexuality and Students with Mental Retardation , 1988 .

[12]  E. Brantlinger.  Teachers' Perceptions of the Sexuality of Their Secondary Students with Mild Mental Retardation. , 1988 .

[13]  D. Carnine,et al.  Effects of instructional Design Variables on Vocabulary Acquisition of LD Students , 1987, Journal of learning disabilities.

[14]  A. Halpern.  Transition: A Look at the Foundations , 1985, Exceptional children.

[15]  E. Brantlinger.  Mildly Mentally Retarded Secondary Students' Information about and Attitudes toward Sexuality and Sexuality Education. , 1985 .

[16]  D. Graff.  Teacher preparation: the key to effective sex education for the mentally retarded. , 1983, Health education.

[17]  M. Will.  OSERS Programming for the Transition of Youth with Disabilities: Bridges from School to Working Life. , 1983 .

[18]  A. Ivey,et al.  Intentional interviewing and counseling , 1983 .

[19]  William Strong,et al.  Facing Value Decisions: Rationale-Building for Teachers , 1982 .

[20]  G. Frith,et al.  Sex Education: The Neglected Dimension on the Secondary Level Individualized Education Plans , 1981 .