Environmental impact analysis of chemicals and energy consumption in wastewater treatment plants: case study of Oslo, Norway.

Wastewater treatment plants, while performing the important function of treating wastewater to meet the prescribed discharge standards, consume energy and a variety of chemicals. This paper analyses the consumption of energy and chemicals by wastewater treatment plants in Oslo over eight years, and their potential environmental impacts. Global warming and acidification were the dominant impacts for chemicals and energy, respectively. Avoided impacts due to usable by-products - sludge, ammonium nitrate and biogas - play a key role in shrinking the environmental footprint of the wastewater plants. The scope for decreasing this footprint by streamlining energy and chemicals consumption is limited, however, considering that over 70% of the impact is accounted for by the eutrophication potential (thanks to the nitrogen and phosphorus which is discharged to the sink) of the treated effluent wastewater.

[1]  J. Keller,et al.  Greenhouse gas production in wastewater treatment: process selection is the major factor. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[2]  Albert Germain,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Water: From the pumping station to the wastewater treatment plant (9 pp) , 2007 .

[3]  R M Ashley,et al.  Life cycle analysis and sewer solids. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[4]  C. Kennedy,et al.  Water Use Model for Quantifying Environmental and Economic Sustainability Indicators , 2007 .

[5]  Poul Harremoës.  Upgrading our inherited urban water systems , 1998 .

[6]  Ronald L. Droste,et al.  Theory And Practice Of Water And Wastewater Treatment , 1996 .

[7]  Robert Eckard,et al.  Station Efficiency Reduces Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 2008 .

[8]  N Funamizu,et al.  Reuse of heat energy in wastewater: implementation examples in Japan. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[9]  S Soda,et al.  Model analysis of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of sewage sludge treatment systems with different processes and scales. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[10]  H Wenzel,et al.  Environmental accounting--a decision support tool in WWTP operation and management. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[11]  X C Wang,et al.  Application of life cycle assessment for an evaluation of wastewater treatment and reuse project--case study of Xi'an, China. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[12]  G Venkatesh,et al.  Changes in material flows, treatment efficiencies and shifting of environmental loads in the wastewater treatment sector. Part I: Case study of the Netherlands , 2009, Environmental technology.

[13]  G Venkatesh,et al.  Changes in material flows, treatment efficiencies and shifting of environmental loads in the wastewater treatment sector. Part II: Case study of Norway , 2009, Environmental technology.

[14]  Andrew Shaw,et al.  Assessing the carbon footprint of water production , 2008 .

[15]  O Nowak,et al.  Benchmarks for the energy demand of nutrient removal plants. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.