Between Scylla and Charybdis - and Enjoying it? Organisational Tensions and Research Work

Science Studies, Vol. 13(2000) No. 2, 52–76 In Greek mythology, Scylla and Charybdis were two immortal monsters that lived in the narrow waters traversed by the hero Odysseus. They are personifications of a whirlpool and a dangerous rock, but Scylla and Charybdis can also be seen as a poetic expression to the dangers that confronted Greek mariners when they ventured into uncharted waters. With increasing demands for external relevance, utility value or commercialisation of research results, as well as new forms of management, evaluation and accountability, many researchers probably feel they are venturing into uncharted waters too. For instance, in cross-sector research co-operation, careful manoeuvring may be necessary to avoid the projects from turning into traditional industrial R&D or private sponsorship of traditional academic research. Indeed, research work, with a fundamental demand for originality, is a constant venture into uncharted waters in itself. However, the balance of opposing forces, be it whirlpools or rocks, is not a new phenomenon in scientific work. Kuhn (1963) claimed that scientists face “creative tensions” that can be “almost unbearable”, and Pelz & Andrews (1976) found that research performance was highest under conditions that seemed antithetical, e.g. simultaneous high levels of autonomy and dependency upon others. In the general literature about organisations, issues like ambiguity, paradox and tension have become popular, not least following the emergence of themes such as learning and change management. A central claim in the literature is that tensions need to be balanced or maintained if the organisation is to change, be productive and/or to innovate (see Foss Hansen, 1995; Dougherty, 1996; Weick & Westley, 1996; Birkelund, 2000). In this paper, I will take a closer look at tensions in research work and research units. My starting point is that many scientists reportedly have produced higher quality work in some reBetween Scylla and Charybdis – and Enjoying it? Organisational Tensions and Research Work

[1]  Edward J. Hackett,et al.  Science as a Vocation in the 1990s: The Changing Organizational Culture of Academic Science. , 1990 .

[2]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Handbook of organization studies , 1997 .

[3]  Frank M. Andrews,et al.  Scientists in Organizations , 1968 .

[4]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations , 1988 .

[5]  Harriet Zuckerman,et al.  Research strategies in science: A preliminary inquiry , 1994 .

[6]  H. Montgomery,et al.  Scientists Conceptions of Scientific Quality: An Interview Study , 1990 .

[7]  S. Toulmin,et al.  Philosophy of Science , 1970, The British Journal for the History of Science.

[8]  Joseph P. Martino,et al.  The subjective side of science : Mitroff, Ian I., Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1974, 329 pp., $11.50 , 1976 .

[9]  John Ziman,et al.  "Post-Academic Science": Constructing Knowledge with Networks and Norms , 1996 .

[10]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[11]  Deborah Dougherty,et al.  Organizing for Innovation , 1999 .

[12]  Youngbae Kim,et al.  R&D project team climate and team performance in Korea: A multidimensional approach , 1995 .

[13]  Paul G. Hare,et al.  Modelling the determination of research output in British universities , 1988 .

[14]  Geoff Kaine,et al.  The determinants of research performance: A study of Australian university economists , 1994 .

[15]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Organizational Learning: Affirming an Oxymoron , 1999 .

[16]  Tove Thagaard Research Environment, Motivation and Publication Productivity , 1991 .

[17]  Li Bennich-Björkman,et al.  Organising Innovative Research: The Inner Life of University Departments , 1997 .

[18]  Lynn Dirk,et al.  A Measure of Originality , 1999 .

[19]  J. S. Long,et al.  Organizational Context and Scientific Productivity , 1981 .

[20]  F. Herzberg,et al.  The motivation to work , 1960 .

[21]  F. Nijhuis,et al.  Prediction of scientific performance in clinical medicine , 1990 .

[22]  Hanne Foss Hansen Organizing for Quality - A Discussion of Different Evaluation Methods as Means for Improving Quality in Research , 1995 .

[23]  D C Pelz,et al.  Creative Tensions in the Research and Development Climate , 1967, Science.

[24]  P. Blau The Organization of Academic Work , 2021 .

[25]  Calvin W. Taylor,et al.  Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development. , 1963 .

[26]  H. Etzkowitz The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages , 1998 .

[27]  W. Abernathy Innovation : Mapping the winds of creative destruction * , 2003 .

[28]  David A. Nadler,et al.  Organizing for Innovation , 1986 .

[29]  J. Ravetz Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems , 2020 .